Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

Law paper 1 Section A > Jury > Flashcards

Jury Flashcards

(61 cards)

Start Studying
1
Q

What act was amended by the Criminal Justice Act 2003

A

S1 Juries Act 1974

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does the S1 Juries Act 1974 outline?

A

Who is eligible for jury service

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what does s1 juries act 1974 say about who is elgible?

A

-Between 18-75 years old
-UK resident for at least 5 years since 13th birthday
-Be on the electoral register

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

give two examples of mental disorders that would make a person unfit for jury service

A

psychopathic disorder
resident of an institution or hospital

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what two sentences disqualifies someone for jury service

A

life sentences
custodial sentence over 5 yrs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what two sentences would temporarily disqualify someone from jury service

A

any sentence under 5 yrs
those on bail are banned for the duration of their bail

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

state 2 factors of a physical disability meaning people are incapable of jury service

A

blind
cant understand english

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what does S9 Juries Act 1974 say

A

allows for an excusal or deferral which means that a person may be able to have jury service cancelled or deferred until a more convienient time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are the 5 reasons someone can cancel their jury service

A

weddings
exams
work committments
childcare commitments
pre booked holiday

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

for jury selection, where are names selected from

A

the electoral register

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what responsiblity does the central jury summoning bureau have

A

they sent sumomons to those whose names have been selected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

for jury selection, if you have been summoned and cannot attend what must they do

A

notify the court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

if someone cannot attend jury service and do not notify the court what happens

A

they get fined 1000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

if your summoned for jury service how many days are you expetced to attend for

A

10 working days

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what doe vetting mean

A

checking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what are two types of checks (vetting)

A

police checks
wider background checks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

whats the purpose of police checks (vetting)

A

ensures no juror is disqualified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

when should wider background checks take place (vetting)

A

only allowed in exceptional circumstances
the attorney general has to give express permission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

the court clerk selects how many jurors

A

12 from 15 at random

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

prosecution and defence have the right to challenge the jury, what are the two challenges

A

challenge the whole jury
challenge an indiviudual juror

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what is challenging the whole jury known as

A

challenege to array

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what is challenging an indivudual juror known as

A

challenge for cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

why would challenge to the whole jury be done

A

if the jury is unrepresentative or selected in a biased way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

why is challenging an individual juror done

A

juror may disqualified or may know someone in the case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
an example of challenging the whole jury?
R v Fraser
26
what happened in R v Fraser
D was from an ethnic minority, jurors chosen bc they were white. judge agreed to empanel another jury
27
example of challenging an individual juror
R v wilson and sprason
28
what happened in wilson v sprason
Convictions quashed for bias where a jury member was the wife of a prison officer who was in contact with the defendant while he was a remand prisoner
29
name the 4 advantages of juries
jury equity public confidence secrecy no personal bias
30
name the 4 disadvantages of juries
modern tech preverse decisions secrecy risk of bias
31
the jury hears what type of offences?
indictable and triable either way
32
how many cases are heard each year
30,000
33
is the jury the sole decider of the verdict?
yes, they base their decision on the evidence they hear in court
34
what do jurors have to take before entering court
an oath/affirmation
35
is the judge allowed to influence the juries decision
no even if the judge doesnt agree they must not influence the jury
36
what is bushells case
says the judge cant interfer with the juries decision
37
do the jury have to give reasons for the verdict they reach
no
38
the jury must listen to evidence from who
prosecution and defence they must listen to the judges summing up at the end too
39
at the end of a prosecution case what can the judge direct the jury to
acquit D if there is insufficient evidence against D
40
whats a direct acquital
when a judge instructs the jury to find the defendant not guilty, typically due to insufficient evidence or a legal flaw in the prosecution's case.
41
what percentage of cases does a direct acquital happen
10%
42
case example of a direct acquital?
R v Counsell
43
What is the contempt of court act 1981
makes it a offence to disclose the content of any discussions in the jury room with anyone outside
44
what is the role of a foreman/woman
control discussions in the jury room publicly announce the verdict
45
what does the foreman do if the majority is a split decision
must announce the number of jurors agreeing and disagreeing with the verdict
46
the judge will direct the jury to reach a ...... verdict
unamimous
47
the CJA 1967 says that after 2 hours if the jury hasnt agreed on a verdict what happens
the judge can accept a majority verdict from the jury (10-2 or 11-1)
48
if less than 9 jurors agree what is this called
a hung jury
49
what happens if its a hung jury
the judge discharges them and D faces a re trial in front of a new jur
50
what case did a hung jury happen
r v jenkins
51
name the two concerns of roles of a jury before the CJCA 2015
1. easy for jurors to research defendants or other relevent details 2. easy for internet research to be shared as jurors discuss in privacy
52
# 4 things what does the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 say
-jurors hand in electronic devices before trial -jury officer can search the jurors for devices -criminal offence to research a case -criminal offence for jurors to share researched info
53
explain the disadvnatage of preverse decisions
This could be because they are ignoring the law and basing their decision on their conscience (jury equity), or could be due to lack of understanding of the case because they are lay people with no legal training. In R v Owen, D was almost definitely guilty (of a very serious crime) but was allowed to go free because the jury felt bad for him. This defeats the point of the law if the jury can just ignore it whenever they want. It also denies D the right to a fair trial (which is a human right)
54
explain the disadvantage of secrecy
he Contempt of Court Act makes it an offence to share discussions which take place in the jury room. They also do not need to reveal any reasons for their decision (Bushel’s case). In R v Young, the jury used a Ouija board to ask V who the killer was. They then found D guilty based on this rather than any evidence in court (D’s conviction was quashed when this was discovered). The secrecy is then bad because we can’t tell if the jury are actually using the evidence to make a decision or random information/prejudice.
55
explain the disadvantage of modern tech
Information about cases and Ds is widely available on the internet and may even be discussed on social networking sites, but juries are only meant to o use the evidence in court under their oath/affirmation. In 2010, 12% of jurors in high profile cases admit using the internet. This was the problem in AG v Dallas and has led to the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015. It is hard to stop the jury using the internet at home (even with the new Act) and not all info online is reliable, meaning such details may prejudice the jury.
56
explain the disadvnatage of bias
This may be because some people find certain jobs more or less honest (ie a priest compared to a salesman), or have prejudice against other races. In Sander v UK, it was shown that members of a jury were making openly racist remarks and jokes about the defendant in their trial, and it was held this went against D’s right to a fair trial. This is a problem because it means justice is not being achieved and it is hard to know if people hold these biases.
57
explain the advantage of jury equity
Jurors can decide verdict according to what they think is morally right and wrong, they do not have to follow the law if they think it is unfair. For example, in R v Owen, D was almost certainly guilty. However the jury sympathised with D’s situation and felt he had been punished enough already, so found him not guilty despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. This is good because juries can make fair/just decisions based on their conscience, whereas a judge would have to apply the law even if it lead to a bad decision.
58
explain the advantage of secrecy
The Contempt of Court Act 1981 makes it an offence to share discussions which take place in the jury room. They also do not need to reveal any reasons for their decision (Bushel’s case). Research shows that jurors do appear to discuss the evidence in detail and take the standard of proof very seriously (shown by higher acquittal rates in Crown Courts (about 60%) than Magistrates’ Courts). If discussions were to be made public, jurors may not want to be as open and honest with their thoughts and may feel pressured into a decision. Also, less people may want to serve as jurors in the first place if they will be judged for their verdict.
59
explain the advnatage of public confidence
This is probably because it is a ‘trial by peers’ - D is judged by ordinary members of the public rather than just one legal expert (a judge). This means the jury are representative of society making the system more democratic. A survey by the Law Society showed 80% of people would trust a jury more than a judge or magistrates. This shows support and agreement with the justice system, suggesting it actually works.
60
explain the advnatage of impartial
Jury members cannot know anyone involved in the case and will therefore not have any personal bias against those involved. For example, in R v Wilson and Sprason, the wife of the prison officer overseeing D was not allowed to sit on the jury for fear this may create bias. This should ensure that the decision is based purely on the evidence in court, and that justice is actually achieved in the way we want
61
if the jury dont understand the law or evidence what can they do
pass a note to an usher who then gives it to the judge

Law paper 1 Section A (8 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions