Kant - Complete Flashcards

1
Q

What is Kant’s critique of Hume?

A

Our minds are not blank receptors, but an active processor of sensory inputs. We process these inputs in terms of the mind’s own inherent structure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does the Copernican Revolution in philosophy say?

A

Knowledge is partly created by prior knowledge (or by transcendental/supernatural factors), which the mind imposes upon the data of experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who introduced the Copernican Revolution in Philosophty?

A

Kant introduced the Copernican Revolution in Philosophy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does Kant mean by “knowledge must conform to objects”?

A

The mind shapes sensory things into things it can identify and this is then called knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does Kant mean by “a priori”?

A

Something that you can know about an object without having to experience the object first (before you first see it).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does Kant think is the ‘failure’, in of the empiricists?

A

If you’re an empiricist and have a blank slate mind (just a ‘mirror’) then you can’t form the objects because there is no structure there for it to work with.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does Kant say about knowledge with regard to experience and its beginning?

A

Knowledge may BEGIN with experience, but it does not follow that it all ARISES out of experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What two things does Kant think our empirical knowledge is composed of?

A
  1. What we receive through impressions, and

2. What the mind contributes to our knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does Kant believe to be the ‘Pure Concept of Understanding’? Provide ONE example.

A

The understanding of the unity of the various representations in a judgement

EXAMPLE:
A chair is green (ab)
Value (a) is the chair.
Value (b) is the colour green.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Does Kant believe Metaphysical knowledge to be possible?

A

Kant believes Metaphysical knowledge to be IMPOSSIBLE.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Regarding tastes, odours, and colours, Galileo states: “Hence if the living creature were removed, all these qualities would be wiped away and annihilated.” With respect to Kant, Galileo’s
remark relates directly to…:

A

Kant’s claim that space and time are a priori forms of sensibility.

He says that tastes, odors, and colours are not mind-independent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does Kant perceive the mind?

A

It is not a blank slate - instead ‘mind-as-active-processor’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is causality according to Kant?

A

The expression of the “if A, then B” logical format.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

According to Kant what is human experience composed of?

A

THE COMBINATION OF:

  1. The mind with a given original structure.

AND

  1. Given sensory inputs.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How do we know that ‘all events are caused’ A PRIORI?

A

Since we are logical beings we must think in terms of the logical format of causality that “if A, then B”.

Thus we know a priori that given our rational constitution, our experience will always appear to us deterministically and mechanically (i.e. as being thoroughly scientifically understandable).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why is the format of causality (“If A, then B”) important to Kant’s philosophy?

A

Since people are logical beings they can only see the world in terms of “if A, then B”.

17
Q

How does Kant reply to Hume’s conclusion that “all events are entirely loose and separate”?

A

By showing that the concept of causality is a necessary connection that does not derive from experience.
- Through “If A, then B”

18
Q

What is Kant’s argument for Space?

A

“A depends upon B, but B does not depend upon A”

  • Space is an a priori representation
  • It necessarily underlies outer appearances.
  • Cannot think of an object without thinking about space as well.
  • If you remove space you remove the object, but not vice versa.
  • Therefore space is presupposed/a priori.
19
Q

What are Kant’s conclusions about Space, Time and Logical Thinking?

A

Space, time and logical thinking are only human ways to grasp what is ultimately real.

  • Features of the human mind’s innate structure.
  • ‘Subjective’ (derived from the subject of experience) insofar as they derive from the essence of the human subject.
  • Not features of absolute reality/’things-in-themselves’. (i.e. not ascribable to the mind-independent world).
20
Q

What are Kant’s THREE main conclusions?

A
  1. NEVER KNOW how THINGS are IN THEMSELVES.
  2. EXPERIENCE always IN SPACE and TIME and of things CAUSAL connection.
  3. Space, time and logical thinking are ONLY AN APPEARANCE of how things are in themselves.
21
Q

What is Hegel’s critique of Kant? THREE parts.

A
  1. Kant assumes that there is a difference between ourselves and this cognition (i.e. reason/logic).
  2. Cognition/reason is part of the ultimate reality, not independent of it.
  3. We try to understand ultimate reality/the absolute and do that by trying to understand the nature of our capacities. However, Hegel says this is wrong - use our own rational capacities to examine our own rational capacities.
22
Q

What is Hegel’s critique of Kant: ‘We try to understand ultimate reality by trying to understand the nature of our capacities.’

A

Hegel says this is wrong

- Use our own rational capacities to examine our own rational capacities.

23
Q

What is Hegel’s critique of Kant’s use of reason/cognition?

A

Kant assumes that there is a difference between ourselves and this cognition (i.e. reason/logic).

24
Q

What is Hegel’s critique of Kant: ‘cognition is independent and separated from the Absolute. I.E. If reason wasn’t there, then the ultimate reality would still be there.’

A

COGNITION/REASON IS PART OF THE ULTIMATE REALITY, not independent of it.

  • We are already ‘in’ the truth.