Kelly Flashcards
(40 cards)
● it is a “___________”, or a theory about theories
metatheory
● all people anticipate events by the meanings or interpretations they place on those events
➔ these meanings or interpretations are called_________
constructs
the view that people are not victims of circumstances because alternative constructions are always available
constructive alternativism
believed that human behavior is based both on reality and on people’s perception of reality
● he holds that the universe is real, but different people construe it in different ways
George Kelly
➔ people’s __________ __________hold the key
to predicting their behavior
personal constructs
ways of interpreting and explaining events
●___________ theory does not try to explain nature, but rather is a theory of people’s construction of events: their
personal constructs
acting in the same manner as a scientist
➔ asking questions, formulating
hypotheses, testing them, drawing conclusions, and trying to predict future events
Person as scientist
● if people can be seen as scientists, then scientists can also be seen as people
•the pronouncement of scientists should be regarded with the same skepticism with which we view any behavior
➔ every scientific observation can be looked at from a different perspective
➔ every theory can be slightly tilted and viewed from a new angle
Scientist as person
different people construe reality in different ways, and the same person is capable of changing his view of the world
➔ people always have alternative ways of looking at things
Constructive alternativism
• assumes that the piece-by-piece accumulation of facts does not add up to truth; rather, it assumes that facts can be looked at from different perspectives •agreed with Adler that a person’s interpretation of events is more important than the events themselves
➔ interpretations have meaning in the dimension of time
➔ what is valid at one time becomes false when construed differently at a later time
Constructive alternativism
________ & __________ do not dictate conclusions; rather, they carry meanings for us to discover
facts and events
● one’s way of seeing how things (or people) are alike yet different from other things
● the ways in which people make sense of the world
● personal constructs shape human behavior, whether they are clearly perceived or dimly felt
Personal Constructs
●assumes that “a person’s processes are psychologically channelized by the ways in which that person anticipates events”
Basic postulate
refers to a living, changing, moving human being; he did not recognize motives, drives, needs, or instincts as forces underlying motivation
person’s processes
the term____________ suggests that people move with a direction through a network of pathways or channels
channelized
this suggests that people guide their actions according to their predictions of the future; our present view of the future shapes our actions
ways of anticipating events
people’s behaviors (thoughts and actions) are directed by the way they see the future
this postulate is not intended as an absolute statement of truth but is a tentative assumption open to question and scientific testing
Basic postulate
11 supporting corollaries that can be inferred from the basic postulate
1) Similarities among events
2) Differences among people
3) Relationships among constructs
4)Dichotomy of constructs
5) Choice between dichotomies
6) Range of convenience
7) Experience and Learning
8) Adaptation to experience
9) Incompatible constructs
10) Similarities among people
11) Social processes
~ construction corollary
~ states that “a person anticipates events by
construing their replications”
• no two events are exactly alike, yet we construe similar events so that they are perceived as being the same
• emphasizes the notion that people interpret future events according to recurrent themes or replications
Similarities among events
● individuality corollary
● “persons differ from each other in their
construction of events”
● because people have different collections of
experiences, they construe the same event
in different ways
➔ no two people put an experience together
in exactly the same way
● although individual differences was
emphasized, Kelly pointed out that experiences can be shared and that people can find a common ground for construing experiences
Differences among people
~ organization corollary
~ states that people “characteristically evolve–for their convenience in anticipating events–a construction system embracing ordinal relationships between constructs” emphasizes that different people organize similar events in a manner that minimizes incompatibilities and inconsistencies
➔ we arrange our constructs so we may move from one to another in an orderly fashion
➔ this allows a person to anticipate events in ways that avoid contradictions and conflicts
assumes an ordinal relationship of constructs so that one construct may be subsumed under another
Relationships among constructs
● dichotomy corollary
● “a person’s construction system is
composed of a finite number of
dichotomous constructs”
● a construct is an either-or proposition; black
or white, with no shades of gray
● to form a construct, people must be able to
see similarities between events, but they must also contrast those events with their opposite pole
Dichotomy of constructs
● choice corollary
● people have some choice in following
alternative courses of action
● “people choose for themselves that
alternative in a dichotomized construct through which they anticipate the greater possibility for extension and definition of future constructs”
● people make choices on the basis of how they anticipate events, and those choices are between dichotomous alternatives
● assumes that people choose those actions that are most likely to extend their future range of choices
Choice between dichotomies
range corollary
assumes that personal constructs are finite and not relevant to everything
“a construct is convenient for the anticipation of a finite range of events only”
➔ a construct is limited to a particular range of convenience
allowed Kelly to distinguish between a
concept and a construct
Range of convenience