Kew Internship Flashcards

(215 cards)

1
Q

RBG Kew Study Limitations

A

Our study does have certain limitations that need to be acknowledged. Firstly, the utilisation of herbarium specimens, which consist of dried material, poses some challenges. It is important to note that these specimens vary in quality, and that some are damaged or degraded, potentially impacting the accuracy and reliability of our observations.

Another limitation is related to georeferencing, which relies on the accuracy of the data recording. The precision of our georeferencing is contingent upon the quality and completeness of the available data. Therefore, any inaccuracies or limitations in the georeferencing data may influence the reliability of our findings.

Additionally, our study is constrained by a relatively small sample size. As a result, it becomes challenging to generate statistically significant p-values. However, it is crucial to emphasize that our approach is exploratory in nature, aiming to uncover initial trends and patterns that can guide further research in this area.

Furthermore, it is important to understand that the relationship between stomatal size and drought tolerance is not universally linear. Different plant species and genotypes may exhibit distinct responses to variations in stomatal size under drought stress. Moreover, a plant’s overall drought tolerance is influenced by various traits, including stomatal density, leaf anatomy, and root characteristics. Therefore, it is essential to consider these additional factors alongside the four chosen leaf traits when evaluating a plant’s response to drought conditions.

Additionally, there is an ongoing debate in the field of functional ecology regarding the predictability of traits from environmental factors and the possibility of isolating single climatic variables and traits amid the complexity of drought conditions. This discussion highlights the challenges and complexities associated with understanding and predicting plant responses to drought, underscoring the need for comprehensive research and analysis in this field.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Fourth Corner Analysis

A

Fourth corner analysis allows the researcher to explore the relationship between species traits, environmental variables, and community composition. It can help identify the environmental variables that are most strongly associated with the distribution of species traits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Phylogenetic Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

A

PPCA is an extension of the traditional PCA method that incorporates information about the phylogenetic relationships among species.
- It considers the evolutionary relatedness of species when analysing and interpreting patterns of variation in multivariate data.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

NMDS

A

Non-metric Multi-Dimensional Scaling is a technique used for visualizing and analysing dissimilarity or distance matrices.
- multiple variables and want to explore the similarity or dissimilarity patterns among your samples.

  • If samples with similar trait values tend to cluster together or show a gradient in the reduced-dimensional space, the pattern would suggest a potential association between the leaf traits and climatic variables.

NMDS is a nonlinear ordination method that can handle complex relationships between variables.

Unlike PCA, NMDS does not assume linear relationships or normality. This flexibility makes NMDS suitable for capturing non-linear patterns and exploring complex ecological data.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is an ANOVA?

A

ANOVA tells you if there are any statistical differences between the means of three or more independent groups.

If there is a lot of variance (spread of data away from the mean) within the data groups, then there is more chance that the mean of a sample selected from the data will be different due to chance

All these elements are combined into a F value, which can then be analysed to give a probability (p-value) of whether or not differences between your groups are statistically significant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is an eigenvalue?

A

PCA
- variation in distance along each principal component

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is continuous variable?

A

A continuous variable is a variable that can take on any value within a range (infinite values)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a discrete variable?

A

A discrete variable is a variable that takes on distinct, countable values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Summarise your palm findings

A

Data is still being analysed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why did you pick yams?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a correlation?

A

any statistical relationship, whether causal or not, between two random variables or bivariate data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why does this study matter?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the implications for yam conservation?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What’s next for the research?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

If you had £1m what would you do to continue the research?

A

repeat in the field
consider tuber yield
growth habit
transplant experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why did you sample like that?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How many known species?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Explain yam diversification onto Madagascar

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Define climatic niche?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What factors did you not include in your niche?

A

Soil type
Humidity
Altitude - directly
Natural Disturbances: Consider other natural disturbances, such as floods or storms
Groundwater Level
pH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

How does Stomatal size directly affects the rate of gas exchange in plants?

A

Larger stomata enhance the efficiency of gas diffusion, supporting processes like photosynthesis, but they also influence water loss through transpiration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

How does genome size determine stomatal size?

A

Sets the minimum nucleus - cell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Dioscorea is polyploid, how could that affect stomatal size?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is a eudicot?

A

The eudicots, Eudicotidae, or eudicotyledons are a clade of flowering plants mainly characterized by having two seed leaves upon germination.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Explain: (Sandel et al., 2015) detected trait value biases in frequently measured against rarely measured species
26
Why is still some way to go before image processing technology can be used reliably, especially for less well studied crops (Li et al., 2023).
27
Heberling Protocols for SLA "Specific Leaf Area data can also be gathered, provided that adjusted protocols are used (Heberling, 2022)."
28
What were your hypotheses?
"The first hypothesis questions whether a correlation exists between these traits and climatic conditions at the genus, bioregion and species level.
29
How did you supervisors make the SDMs? The supervisors of the project provided Species Distribution Maps of EMYs and a dated Phylogenetic Tree of the Malagasy Clade
30
How did you supervisors make the dated Phylogenetic Tree of the Malagasy Clade
This tree was built using 260 targeted **low-copy nuclear genes **following Soto Gomez et al. (2019). HybPiper (Johnson et al. 2016) was used to assemble and extract the targeted genes, alignments were built and edited with MAFFT (Katoh & Standley 2013) and TRIMAL (Capella-Gutiérrez et al. 2009), respectively. Phylogenetic trees were built using a supermatrix approach in RAxML-NG (Kozlov et al. 2019) using the GTR+G molecular evolution model and 1000 bootstrap replicates. **Divergence times were estimated using treePL** (Smith & O’Meara 2012) by calibrating the stem node of D. sansibarensis at 22.5548 Ma (HPD: 15.5797-29.1444 Ma) following Viruel et al. (2016). Overall, the phylogenetic relationships are very well supported by the bootstrap values. The earliest diverged species appears to be D. sansibarensis. Then the MEYs clade can be divided in four main subclades: the subclade I including 4 species, the subclade II including 9 species, the subclade III including 16 species and the subclade IV including 4 species. D. arcuatinervis occupies a very distinct position in the phylogeny and cannot be attributed to any of those subclades. Finally, an accumulation curve of the number of lineages through time was produced
31
How did you clean? What did you remove? The EMY-GBIF dataset was cleaned using CoordinateCleaner package (Zizka et al., 2019) to remove absent or inaccurate coordinates.
32
Why WorldClim, why 30 arc seconds? Bioclimatic variables from the WorldClim 2.1 Dataset with a spatial resolution of 30 arc seconds.
33
What does a PCA do and why can we use it to identify climate niches?
34
What are the caveats of using a PCA to estimate species niche?
35
Why did you pick 0.8 to 0.8 collinearity?
36
Explain how you selected herbarium material?
K-means clustering algorithm was used in conjunction with a dendrogram
37
Leaf samples were mounted on Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) stubs and sputter-coated with platinum (21.45g/m3) for 120s at 30mA using the Quorum Q150T ES. Why Platinum? Why that time and speed?
A suitable platinum coating needs to be only half the thickness required for gold, resulting in less specimen distortion and giving superior peak-to-background ratio in X-ray analysis.
38
Why do you test for normal distribution using the Shapiro-Wilk test (shapiro.test() function? How does it work?
The Shapiro–Wilk test is essentially a goodness-of-fit test. That is, it examines how close the sample data fit to a normal distribution. It does this by ordering and standardizing the sample (standardizing refers to converting the data to a distribution with mean μ = 0 and standard deviation σ = 1 ).
39
Explain why you: Using the fitContinuous() function from the ‘geiger’ package (Pennell, 2014), five evolutionary models were applied to the trait data: Brownian Motion, Trend, Lambda, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck and Early Burst. Models were ranked according to minimum Akaike Information Criterion corrected (AICc) value and the maximum log-likelihood value (lnL) with the Lambda value reflecting the strength of the phylogenetic signal for each trait.
40
Explain PGLS
The trait-specific lambda values were then used in a Phylogenetic Generalised Least Squares (PGLS) analysis to examine the relationships between the traits and climate variables while controlling for phylogenetic signal. PGLS models were fitted using the 'gls' function from the 'nlme' package (Pinheiro, Bates and R Core Team, 2023), with correlation structure specified as Pagel's lambda.
41
What are the pros and cons?
42
Why did you average the models? The models were averaged using the model.avg() function from MuMIN
- acknowledge that there might be multiple models that could be used to describe our data - by weighting the average we can communicate how confident we are in each individual model’s view of the world. - model averaging usually reducing prediction errors beyond even above even the best individual component model
43
Caveats of small sample size
The sample size for each species was too small to build complex predictive models at the species level.
44
Why did you use different packages in the second pca? To conduct a PCA to identify patterns in the trait data and visualize the trait space, we used factoextra (Kassambara and Mundt, 2020) and factoMineR (Le, Josse and Husson, 2008). SLA, PL and SD were used in the analysis, and the resulting PCA plot displayed individuals as points in the trait space.
45
Why was the size of the trait space, representing the variation in trait values for a species, hypothesized to be associated with climatic resilience?
46
Explain your trait PCA
47
Why did you log10 some of the values sometimes?
48
Trait x Bioregion Table Why were there no significant differences detected for SD and invPLSD in Bioregion
49
Phylogenetic Model Define: log likelihood score
50
Phylogenetic Model Define: AICc.
51
Phylogenetic Model Define: Lambda
indicates the strength of the phylogenetic signal, with 0 signalling no phylogenetic signal and 1 indicating a Brownian Motion model.
52
What is Brownian Motion
53
In the dry season Why does pore length increase as precipitation in the driest month increase if there are no leaves?
54
Why was SA_02 collected from continental Africa?
55
Why only 3 namorokensis?
56
What are the implications of different no. individuals on statistical tests?
57
Explain the following: Therefore, present-day geographic distribution of the clades is thought to reflect dispersal ability and the formation of key geographic regions, such as the Central Highlands, but this affected different clades homogenously. Thus, any similarities observed for traits and species occurring in the same bioregions of Madagascar would probably be explained by a similar response to climatic conditions achieved independently in different clades, rather than following a biogeographic pattern linked to the phylogenetic topology.
58
Tell me about D. pteropoda
59
Tell me about D. sansibarensis
Found across Africa and Madagascar atypical. It is often associated with watercourses and is likely to have green shoots and leaves year round in riverine forest (Wilkin, 2023). This may explain why D. sansibarensis shows a different InvPLSD trend to the other species in this region. D. sansibarensis individuals in areas with higher precipitation were found to increase pore length and decrease stomatal density.
60
Tell me about D. proteiformis
Humid species, found exclusively in coastal regions in sub-clade I. Varies all 3 traits in response to climatic variables. Precipitation: Increase SLA and SD, PL decreased. Temp seasonality: increase PL, decrease SLA Temperature: reduce PL, increase SLA
61
Tell me about D. bako
Dry and Subclade III.
62
Tell me about D. bemarivensis
Dry and Sub-arid
63
Tell me about D. seriflora
Humid Region X Datapoints Trends
64
Tell me about D. heteropoda
65
Which species were in the dry region?
D. bemarivensis D. namorokensis D. bako D. maciba D. pteropoda D. sansibarensis
66
Which species were in the humid region?
Proteiformis Madecassa Seriflora
67
Which species were in the sub-humid region?
Heteropoda Hexagona Seriflora
68
Which species were in the sub-arid region?
D. bemarivensis D. nako D. hombuka D. maciba D. sansibarensis
69
Which species were found in multiple regions?
Seriflora - sub humid and humid Maciba, bemarivensis and sansibarensis - dry and subarid
70
Tell me about D. madecassa
71
Tell me about D. hexagona
72
Tell me about D. namorokensis
73
Tell me about D. nako?
74
Tell me about D. namorokensis
75
Tell me about D. maciba
76
Are bioregions are good scale to investigate?
Yes and No. Yes No - E.g. dry region. Habitat variety and sub climates
77
Tell me about D. hombuka
Dioscorea hombuka is unique because it is found in both the Sub-Arid and Sub-Humid regions, suggesting D. hombuka may change its growth rate and habit in response to varying temperature seasonality in different local climatic contexts
78
Why would stomatal density only correlate in the sub-humid region?
The creation of the highlands established empty ecological niches in a milder and more stable climate compared to the other regions which may explain why stomatal density, a more complex developmental trait, is only significantly correlated with climate in this region.
79
How does dredge work?
Models are fitted through repeated evaluation of the modified call extracted from the global.model. “Let the computer find out” is a poor strategy and usually reflects the fact that the researcher did not bother to think clearly about the problem of interest and its scientific setting (Burnham and Anderson,2002).
80
Can you explain what this line means? Here, the model evaluation found that additive effects of annual precipitation + isothermality + precipitation in the driest month + annual temperature range best predicted stomatal density values.
81
Why is this important? D. hexagona, the only selected species found exclusively in the sub-humid region only had one significant trait-climate relationship. It was found to increase pore length and decrease stomatal density in response to higher maximum temperatures. Unlike other EMYs, which are vines, D. hexagona is a unique in that it can show a strictly upright dwarf habit when growing in the savannahs of the Central highlands
Similar observations in dwarf barley and wheat. Brassinosteroids affecting physiological reactions to drought e.g. antioxidant enzymes ascorbate peroxidase (HvAPX) and superoxide dismutase (HvSOD) was BR-dependent.
82
Why is distance from centre of PCA used as a proxy for distinctiveness?
83
D. proteiformis found to vary all three traits in response to different climatic variables which may reflect its adaptation to its distinct coastal distribution. D. proteiformis was found to occupy one of most distinct climate niches (using distance from PCA centroid as a proxy).
84
Why? With a near constant abundance of water, D. proteiformis increases stomatal density and reduced pore length in areas with higher levels of precipitation, which may be an adaptation to prevent overhydration in the Humid region
85
What other adaptations exist to prevent overhydration?
86
How do you measure phenotypic plasticity?
87
What is phenotypic plasticity?
the ability of one genotype to adapt to different conditions
88
Who else has calculated the size of the ellipse?
89
Explain (Blonder, 2018)'s complex mathematical models to estimate the niche hypervolume space
We use a simple elipse but not points are distributed equally in the space. Blonder produces smooth boundaries that can fit data either more loosely (Gaussian kernel density estimation) or more tightly (one-classification via support vector machine). Further, the algorithms can accept abundance-weighted data, and the resulting hypervolumes can be given a probabilistic interpretation and projected into geographic space. These new algorithms provide: (i) a more robust approach for delineating the shape and density of n-dimensional hypervolumes; (ii) more efficient performance on large and high-dimensional datasets; (iii) improved measures of functional diversity and environmental niche breadth
90
Explain 30 arc seconds
30 arc seconds (approximately 1 kilometer) ....
91
What is the relevance of Satellite data, while comprehensive, may not capture fine-grained microclimatic variations, which could be significant for certain species
Microclimate - e.g. precipitation and temperature in that sq m in that year
92
How will soil nutrient levels affect leaf traits?
Soil nutrient levels, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus, play a significant role in shaping these traits by enhancing photosynthetic capacity
93
How will light availability affect leaf traits?
Light availability introduces complexities associated with trade-offs between light interception and water-use efficiency
94
How will canopy position affect leaf traits?
impacts microclimates, affecting trait variation
95
How will biotic interactions affect leaf traits?
herbivory and interspecies competition, may influence resource allocation and trait plasticity (Gorne and Diaz, 2022)
96
How will altitudinal gradients affect leaf traits?
CO2 variations around year.
97
What animals eat yams?
98
How do plants adjust the thickness of their leaves?
99
Is this true? Root traits, such as depth and branching patterns, impact water and nutrient uptake, with drought-adapted species often having extensive root systems
100
Summarise the importance of herbaria?
101
We know the temperature will increase most in the southern parts of the island. How will this affect yams?
102
Why do (Schatz, Cameron and Raminosoa, 2008) estimated that climate change will affect endemic Malagasy species (not yams) in different bioregions differently? Endemic species in the sub-arid region may expand their niche size, whereas species in the dry, the Sub-Humid and the humid regions are predicted range contractions.
103
What is the most important finding of your research?
Proof of Concept, small sample size - herbarium - traits vary within species, between species and bioregion - species level is most insightful - environment impacts these traits more than phylogeny
104
Define type 1 and type 2 for post-hoc error risk
Type 1 Risk = low risk Type 2 Risk = high risk reasonability conservative
105
Cohen's D
106
Stats: Anova
Independent Variable
107
Fundamental niche is the entire set of conditions under which an animal (population, species) can survive and reproduce itself. Realized niche is the set of conditions actually used by given animal (pop, species), after interactions with other species (predation and especially competition) have been taken into account.
conditions, resources, and interactions it needs
108
What is the definition of "climate-induced" famine? Why was Madagascar the first?
109
What is the criterion to be classified as threatened? And Near threatened?
110
Definition of climatic niche? Theoretical vs realised?
111
Difference monocot and dicot? What is a monocot?
112
Fig 2: why is water and O2 going out of closed stomata?
113
What is the formula of photosynthesis?
114
What is a "analogously oriented epidermal cell files of stomata"?
115
In one sentence for each, what are the expectations for SD, SS, and SLA?
116
Explain why the predictions change dep on bioregion, why is this not explained in the report? (SD and prec, PL with prec)
117
What bias may you expect when using herbarium samples to get leaf traits?
Physical Degradation: Loss of Water Content: - This dehydration may influence traits such as specific leaf area (SLA) leading to underestimations Limited Ecological Information: Herbarium specimens often lack detailed ecological information, such as precise location, soil type, and local environmental conditions. Without this information, it may be challenging to contextualize the observed leaf traits in relation to the ecological context. Sampling Bias: Herbarium collections may have been historically biased towards certain regions, habitats, or taxonomic groups. This bias can affect the representativeness of the sampled species and influence the generalizability of the findings. Inconsistencies in Data Recording: Variability in the methods used to collect and preserve herbarium specimens may introduce inconsistencies in the recorded data. These inconsistencies can impact the reliability and comparability of trait measurements across specimens.
118
What is the difference between a hypothesis and a question?
Open-ended inquiry or interrogative statement prompting investigation. While not always directly testable, questions guide research and can lead to the formulation of hypotheses. Hypotheses. Specific, testable statement predicting the outcome of an experiment Designed to be tested through experimentation or data collection.
119
How is including trait data across the phylogeny opening the possibility to detect adaptive speciation?
120
Why is this study important? What if drought resilience had not much to do with leaf traits? What other traits could be interesting?
121
Why did you spend time on palms and you do not mention them in your report?
122
What is a clade?
A clade (also known as a monophyletic group) is a group of organisms that includes a single ancestor and all of its descendents. Clades represent unbroken lines of evolutionary descent.
123
Did you use human observations records from GBIF?
No
124
Why do you remove correlated variables before doing a PCA?
Address issues associated with collinearity, Dominance of a Few Variables: In the presence of highly correlated variables, the PCA may give more weight to those variables and emphasize their contributions disproportionately. This can lead to a situation where a few variables dominate the principal components, potentially obscuring the overall structure of the data. Unstable Component Loadings: Multicollinearity can result in unstable estimates of the component loadings. The loadings indicate the contribution of each variable to each principal component. When variables are highly correlated, small changes in the data can lead to large changes in the loadings, making them less reliable for interpretation. Reduced Interpretability: High multicollinearity can make it challenging to interpret the principal components accurately. Instead of representing distinct patterns in the data, the components may reflect the redundancy of information shared among correlated variables. Inflated Standard Errors: Multicollinearity inflates the standard errors of the estimated coefficients, making it difficult to assess the statistical significance of individual variables or components. This can lead to unreliable hypothesis testing and confidence interval estimates.
125
Is it ok to take only one leaf sample per individual?
Intraindividual in 12
126
How does an SEM work?
127
Why is normality important for your tests?
128
You mention sometimes only 3 samples per species, in this case, is ANOVA really ok? What should be the minimum number of samples per category?
129
Fig 3 (tree) what is the scale?
Scale bar refers to a phylogenetic distance of 0.05 nucleotide substitutions per site. Numbers on the branches indicate bootstrap percentage after 1000 replications in constructing the tree.
130
How did you select the best model? What is Lambda? A model or a value in each model?
131
DREDGE: was it always one trait ~ one predictor? If yes why? If not, where can we see the different models tested?
132
What is delta AIC, and where does the "equivalently the best" quote come from?
133
Species tests: why pearson and not for instance Spearman?
134
ANOVA: significant or no significant difference between clades? (The text is contradictory)
135
Trait and Clim PC correlation: how significant? Give coeff and p-value!! Is this accounting for phylogenetic signal? Would results change if it was? (no since no phylo signal)
136
Do you understand why it is in fact useless to provide the lnL and AIC in Table 5?
137
Why do you use pgls if the phylogenetic signal is so low?
138
Fig 8: what is a "Sig correlation"?
139
What is InvPLSD and why does it suddenly appear ? (Species correlations Table 6)
Variation in size and density of stomata may arise due to genetic factors and/or growth under different environmental conditions. A negative correlation has frequently been suggested between these two stomatal traits. This inverse relationship has been observed in plastic developmental responses to changes in environment and also during long-term evolutionary adaptation
140
What is the use of Fig 9 vs Table 6? Where is its legend?
141
Please explain the SLA results
142
Niche section. It is good to lay out caveats but they were not sufficiently related to your study and your results.
143
What is the difference between causation and correlation?
144
With so many other traits and environmental variables that could be confounding factors, how can you trust your results, how can you go from description to interpretation? What can we say, what can we not say?
145
What can help you compensate for lack of information about leaf microsite in herbarium specimens?
146
You mention how D. proteiformis and madecassa may be affected by climate change - what about the other species?
147
Is your original hypothesis/question answered?
148
How do you conduct statistical power analysis?
Statistical Power (Power): The probability that a statistical test will correctly reject a false null hypothesis. It is the complement of Type II error (false negative rate) and is often denoted as 1−β, where β is the probability of a Type II error. - Type I Error (False Positive): Incorrectly rejecting a true null hypothesis. The probability of Type I error is denoted as α. - Type II Error (False Negative): Failing to reject a false null hypothesis
149
What is a statistical power analysis?
150
Did you find more variation within species or between species?
151
How do you mitigate different herbarium conditions? E.g. time taken to dry
152
Why didn't you do living specimens?
Long generation time. 1 year = 1 cotyledon Years till full individual
153
Different ways of estimating centre of climate niche
Lynn - mean estimate of values
154
PCA
155
How do you generate SDMs?
156
Dredge
A high risk of Type I error means rejecting the null hypothesis when it's actually true. It means concluding that results are statistically significant when, in reality, they came about purely by chance or because of unrelated factors. The risk of committing this error is the significance level (alpha or α) you choose.
157
Type II Error
A type II error is a statistical term used within the context of hypothesis testing that describes the error that occurs when one fails to reject a null hypothesis that is actually false. A type II error produces a false negative, also known as an error of omission.
158
What is a p-value?
probability value. strength of evidence against the null hypothesis, the smaller the p-value the stronger the evidence. The percentage accounts for random noise
159
What are the conditions to use an ANOVA?
Data is normally distributed Distributions have the same variance. Data are independent.
160
What are the caveats of using a PCA?
161
Leaf shrinkage and SLA
162
Why would longer living leaves have a lower SLA
If strategy is to have longer living leaves, we want them to last as long as possible. We want thick tough leaves to protect from damage
163
What is the most significant traits for a vine?
Stem traits e.g. Xylem conductance
164
Explain the mechanisms for stomatal conductance?
165
Difference between drought deciduous and evergreen?
166
Why smaller pore length in humid areas?
Few hypothesis: - increasing conductance = better temp regulation (cooling) - reduce nutritional demand (N+P) - reduced evaporative demand. Smaller stomata = more manipulative ability, ability to react to air points.
167
What is the independent and dependent variables in your anova?
The independent variable is the cause. Its value is independent of other variables in your study. The dependent variable is the effect. Its value depends on changes in the independent variable. Independent - climate variable Effect - traits
168
Herbarium Traits
Leaf stomata are well preserved on herbarium specimens and are especially poised for measurement. Standard specimen preparation protocol includes mounting specimens to sheets such that the adaxial side of some leaves and the abaxial side of other leaves are exposed for measurement. Parkhurst (1978) used specimens to assess which species have stomata on one or both sides of leaves, exploring the adaptive significance of this trait across phylogenies and environmental contexts. Similarly, a classic study by Woodward (1987) measured the stomatal density of seven woody species in Europe, reporting strong declines in stomatal numbers as a result of atmospheric CO2 increases, a phenomenon that has since been repeated across many studies. Of special interest are the historical specimens measured for stomatal traits, with findings of inverse correlations with CO2 levels similar to those found by Woodward (1987). These include specimens collected by Lewis and Clark in North America in the early 1800s (described above with leaf chemistry traits; Teece et al. 2002) and by Joseph Banks and David Solander during James Cook’s voyage to the South Pacific in 1769 (Large et al. 2017). The trait has even been used to reconstruct several millennia of CO2 levels from ancient Egypt to today using preserved olive leaves dating to 1327 BCE from King Tutankhamun’s tomb alongside a chronosequence of traditional herbarium specimens (Beerling and Chaloner 1993). More commonly, paleobotanists now routinely rely on both fossils and herbarium specimens, alongside living material, to assess the functional significance of stomatal density and index in reconstructions of paleoenvironments (Hu et al. 2019).
169
Collector Bias
Potential collection biases and inherent data use limitations have long been recognized (Merrill 1916; Anderson and Turrill 1935; Fogg 1940; Fernald 1950), and recent analyses with digitized collections have shown that herbaria are indeed not random samples (Daru et al. 2018). These “biases” are often intentional, with field botanists and ecologists often interested in different types of questions and using different methods of surveying or collecting (Alba et al. 2021). While it is not possible to definitively know the motivation or sampling strategy of each collector, there are well-established approaches to addressing these potential biases (table 2). Many uses of specimens that are now mainstream (e.g., phenology) were undoubtedly met with skepticism that hindered the progress of methodological development before they became an accepted specimen use. Newly realized herbarium specimen uses push these limits, enabling new insight into old specimens.
170
Herbarium - microsite
Unknown microsite conditions of whole plant or plant parts (e.g., unclear whether sun or shade leaves collected):   Ensure large sample size Woodson 1947   Use habitat information on labels Hanan-A. et al. 2016   Deliberate species selection (e.g., only open shaded habitat species; include species-level habitat affinities in analysis) Koski et al. 2020
171
Trait shifts over time may arise from acclimation (phenotypic plasticity) and/or evolution (adaptation):
Compare focal species with null control congenerics or ecological analogues Case et al. 2007; Flores-Moreno et al. 2015   Include ancillary data (e.g., historical climate records) in analysis Buswell et al. 2011   Compare responses in home and away ranges (in case of invasion studies) Buswell et al. 2011   Use specimens collected repeatedly from the same individual in botanical gardens Miller-Rushing et al. 2009   Conduct common-garden work with known germplasm accessions to link genotype to phenotype Exposito-Alonso et al. 2018   Extract genetic data from specimens to corroborate evolutionary shift Lamar and Partridge 2020
172
Specimen drying, pressing, age, and storage conditions may affect trait measurement values:
Limit analysis to only herbarium-derived traits or compare herbarium-derived and non-herbarium-derived trait measurements on proportional change (i.e., measurement precision robust, accuracy may differ) Many studies   Experimentally simulate storage or preparation conditions to quantify potential effects Miller et al. 2020   Compare herbarium-derived traits with standard protocols and apply necessary correction factors Onstein et al. 2016; Perez et al. 2020
173
Robustness of PCA
Robustness of the PC's increases with increasing sample size but not with the number of traits. Borkland 2019
174
Seasonal Variation Traits
C. Römermann et al. 2016 Looked at same leaf traits in summer green woody species. The results showed that all traits varied significantly throughout the year in a species-specific manner. We concluded that the seasonal timing of trait measurements is crucial. Most notably SLA and stomatal size were the most robust traits in terms of small intraspecific and large interspecific variation and showed largely consistent species rankings across seasons.
175
Why pore size not stomatal size?
Stomatal size (S), as defined by guard cell length (L) and width (W).
176
SLA Evergreen v Deciduous
Evergreen species may show less variation in SLA throughout the seasons compared to deciduous species. Evergreens can maintain leaves year-round, whereas deciduous species undergo seasonal leaf shedding.
177
Bako and Bemarivensis both have similar distributions. Why do we see correlations in some bako but not bemarivensis?
178
Pearson Correlation Test
Measures strength and direction of a linear correlation - R = 1: line passes through centre of all points perfectly - R2 = amount of variance shared by two variables - e.g. 93% variable of X is explained by Y, 7% explained by other factors - 2-tailed hypothesis Doesn't matter which variable on which axis
179
Pearson Assumptions
Random-samples Variables are continuous Data contains paired samples Independence of observations Variables are approximately normally distributed A linear associations exists Absence of outliers
180
Spearman Correlation Test
Measures strength and direction of monotonic association between two ranked variables - rank variables than perform pearson correlation test - outputs coefficient value (Rs) and p value - null hypothesis = no correlation - p value smaller than 0.05 so reject null hypothesis
181
Monotonic Relationship
1) As one variable increases, the other variable never decreases 2) As one variable increases, the other variable never increases Can be linear
182
Spearman Assumptions
1) Random sample 2) Monotonic Association 3) Both variables are at least ordinal (not nominal) 4) Data contains paired samples 5) Independence of observations Don't need normal data e.g non-parametric
183
Were there specific aspects of the SEM images that provided insights not achievable through other methods?
184
Can you describe the sample preparation process for SEM imaging?
185
Did SEM allow for three-dimensional visualization of leaf structures, and if so, how did this enhance your analysis?
186
Were there specific features or structures that were particularly well-characterized with SEM?
187
How did the detailed surface information from SEM contribute to the interpretation of associations between leaf traits and climatic variables?
188
How did you ensure the reproducibility and validation of your microscopy-based measurements?
189
How did scanning electron microscopy contribute to the understanding of the surface morphology of yam leaves?
190
Were there any steps taken to account for potential biases or variability in the microscopy data?
191
Can you elaborate on the fixation techniques used for SEM sample preparation, and how did these techniques impact the preservation of fine structures on the leaf surface?
192
It is a herbaceous, climbing, tropical monocot that looks rather like a dicot, and is part of a lineage that is relatively closely related to the phylogenetically derived group containing the grasses. Therefore, it represents an important biological link between the eudicots and grasses--groups that contain all the model flowering plant species--and has the potential to fill gaps in our knowledge of plant biology and evolution. Yams also offer us the possibility to gain new insights into processes such as tuberization and sex determination, which cannot be studied in current model organisms.
193
What makes Dioscorea a monocot
Despite reticulate leaves - embryonic structure - vascular bundles - leaf venation - floral parts Embryonic Structure: - Yams, like other monocots, develop from seeds with a single cotyledon. Vascular Bundle Arrangement: - scattered vascular bundle pattern characteristic of monocots. Floral Parts: Yams conform to the monocot pattern with floral parts in threes. Dicots usually have floral parts in multiples of four or five. Root Development: Yams typically have fibrous root systems, consistent with monocot characteristics. In contrast to dicots often develop a taproot Secondary Growth: Yams, being monocots, generally do not exhibit secondary growth.
194
How did you validate your microscopic observations with other independent methods or datasets?
195
Were there instances where beam damage influenced the interpretation of surface features?
196
Were there alternative fixation methods considered, and what influenced your final choice?
197
Were there specific regions of the leaf where stomatal density was notably higher or lower?
198
Leaf selection
Large leaves from herbarium specimens Mature where possible
199
Can you discuss the distribution of stomata on the leaf surface and its relevance to water conservation or efficient gas exchange?
200
Describe the types of trichomes present on the leaves of Malagasy yams and their potential functions.
201
How might these patterns influence nutrient and water transport?
202
Discuss the role of leaf anatomy, particularly vascular bundle characteristics, in facilitating or restricting water transport within the plant.
203
How did the cuticle contribute to water retention and protection against desiccation?
204
Describe the structure of a Dioscorea stomata
Dioscorea are randomly orientated and not distributed in cell lines
205
How does intraspecific variability contribute to the ecological success of these plants in different environments?
206
Can you describe the differentiation of tissues within the leaf, including the epidermis, mesophyll, and vascular bundles?
207
How do leaf cells respond at the cellular level to changes in water availability?
208
Were there observable changes in cell size, shape, or arrangement in response to varying water conditions?
209
Cartereau 2019
The Dioscorea genus of yams is a diverse and important group of plants, with many species found in Madagascar. In this study, we investigate the rapid radiation of Malagasy endemic yams and the role of biogeographic history and dispersal evolution in this process. We collected and analyzed molecular data from multiple species of yams, and used phylogenetic and biogeographic methods to reconstruct their evolutionary history. Our results suggest that the rapid radiation of Malagasy yams was driven by a combination of factors, including geological events, climate change, and the evolution of dispersal mechanisms. We also discuss the implications of our findings for the conservation of biodiversity in Madagascar.
210
What is a species distribution model?
identification of areas of likely species occurrence by learning a relationship between knownoccurrences and environmental variables (covariates). The ‘learning’ component of species-environmentrelationships can be accomplished by common machine learning algorithms, such as random forest or MaximumEntropy (MaxEnt). The output of our model is a % estimate of the likelihood of each pixel in ourcalibration area being a presence. This percentage is calculated by counting the number of different decision trees that decided a pixel was either a presence or an absence.
211
Why coat
Non-conductive ones like biological samples, insulating polymers, or certain minerals, can build up a charge when exposed to the electron beam in the SEM. This charge can lead to distorted images and affect the quality of the data. Coating the specimen with a thin layer of conductive material, such as gold or platinum, helps dissipate the charge, enabling better imaging. Conductive coatings provide a uniform surface that reflects electrons back into the detector, enhancing the signal and providing sharper images with better contrast. We can achieve this by applying a thin metal coating, localizing the response from the sample, and improving the contrast and the yield of secondary electrons. Coating a sample will also reduce localized heating, reducing beam damage. Charging-induced damage can occur in non-conductive samples due to the accumulation of electrons on the sample surface. Coating helps to prevent this damage by providing a conductive path for charge dissipation. Coatings reduce the charge of the sample, making it easier to analyze. When the sample is coated, the electrons are removed from the top of the sample, and the sample is grounded, meaning that charge accumulates, forming a potential on top of the sample. If the sample is not coated, that charge accumulates, potentially resulting in negative charging, positive charging or even traveling charge. The accumulation of charge is related to microscope operating conditions, and charge effects may vary between microscope models, including edge charging, line by line charging, area charging or residual charging
212
bootstrap percentage
Bootstrapping statistics is a form of hypothesis testing that involves resampling a single data set to create a multitude of simulated samples. Those samples are used to calculate standard errors, confidence intervals and for hypothesis testing. This approach allows you to generate a more accurate sample from a smaller data set than the traditional method. the proportion of bootstrap replicates (resampled trees) in which a particular branch is supported.
213
leaf economic spectrum (LES)
concept in plant ecology that describes a set of correlated leaf traits observed across various plant species. These traits are thought to be indicative of fundamental trade-offs in resource allocation and physiological strategies employed by plants to adapt to their environments. The leaf economic spectrum provides insights into the functional and ecological strategies that plants employ to optimize their growth and survival in different ecological niches. H
214
LES - Components
- Leaf Longevity: The duration a leaf remains attached to a plant. - Leaf Mass per Area (LMA): The mass of a leaf per unit leaf area, providing information about leaf thickness and structural density. - Photosynthetic Rate (Amax): The maximum rate of photosynthesis, indicating the leaf's capacity for carbon assimilation. - Leaf Nitrogen Content (N): The concentration of nitrogen in the leaf, reflecting the plant's nutrient status and photosynthetic capacity. - Leaf Phosphorus Content (P): The concentration of phosphorus in the leaf, influencing nutrient utilization and growth.
215
Evolution Models
Brownian Motion: - stochastic model where trait evolution is described as a random walk with no specific direction. It assumes that changes in traits accumulate over time due to random processes. - implies continuous and random fluctuations in trait values across the branches of a phylogenetic tree. (null model against which other models are compared) Trend: - introduces a directional component to evolution. It suggests that there is a consistent trend in trait evolution, indicating a gradual shift in trait values over time. Lambda (λ): - Pagel's λ model, is a scaling model that assumes a constant rate of trait evolution across the phylogeny. It introduces a scaling parameter (λ) that represents the degree of phylogenetic signal in the trait. - λ value of 0 indicates no phylogenetic signal (similar to a Brownian Motion model), while a λ value of 1 indicates strong phylogenetic signal, with closely related species having more similar trait values. Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU): - stochastic and deterministic components. It assumes that trait evolution is influenced by both random processes and an attraction toward an optimal or equilibrium trait value. - introduces an optimum trait value and a parameter (α) that measures the strength of attraction toward this optimum. Used to model traits that are subject to stabilising selection. Early Burst: - suggests the rate of trait evolution is not constant across the entire phylogeny. Instead, it proposes an early period of rapid evolution, followed by a slowdown in the rate of change.