key concepts Flashcards
(116 cards)
essential urban characteristics
dense heterogenous population
infrastructure
spatial organisation
socio spatial inequality
public space
political and economic structures of control
louis worth definition of a city
a large dense permanent settlement of socially heterogenous individuals
dimensions of urbanism
social, political, cultural, spatial
specialisation, segmentation and anonymity in urban life (wirth on urbanism)
highly specific roles and high division of labour
social interactions are compartmentalised to many contexts
surrounded by strangers and don’t personally know most people they encounter
different to traditional/rural communities
substitution of secondary ties for primary ties
primary ties eg family, close friends, neighbourhoods (deep intimate personal relations)
vs coworkers, service workers, teachers etc (formal, goal oriented connections) often transactional and temporary
contemporary urban condition
concentration of power, economy and culture
intensified urban processes
three interacted perspectives of urbanism
- physical or built environments, the tangible measurable elements
- social organisations ie institutions and social roles
- cultural attitude ie beliefs, values, mass culture
how physical, social and cultural aspects of urbanism intertwine
physical density affects the type of social organisation that exists,and the social roles and institutions influence dominant cultural attitudes. cultural attitudes also shape urban planning in turn
conceptual dimensions of community
ontological, epistemological and empirical
what is it, how do we study it, what are its impacts and expressions in urban life
mosaic of small worlds
robert park ie chicago school view of cities: a natural social laboratory. a complex patchwork of neighbourhoods, ethnic enclaves, class based groups etc.
contested views of community
is community a practice? a natural inherent quality of places or socially constructed? based on geographic locality or shared/homogeneous identity? can it exist in difference
community emerging in response to threats
demolition or displacement strengthens community
community as a practice
it is not inherent but something we actively do and create. requires intention
community as a rhetorical tool
different parties will evoke community depending on their aims eg a it visits or urban developers
used in struggles over space identity and belonging
localism
devolving power to neighbourhood forums
viewing communities as formal political actors and agents
aims to decentralise power and give local residents a say in development and planning
raises concerns about representation, power asymmetry and inclusivity
public space
areas accessible to all people regardless of ownership eg streets plazas parks sidewalks etc
expanding view of public space
not just physical property, but socially produced, contested and symbolic
three key features of public space
- multiplex, there are multiple forms, functions, meanings and locations
- essentially contested
- tied to visibility and collectivity, they are open, seen and involve collective interests
political dimensions of public space
public space is deeply political, a site of speech protest assembly and opposition
the public is where we enact the public sphere: a place for collective reason and public will
mitchell, arendt and young on public space
- where dissent becomes visible
- crucial for political life, deliberation and political agency
- politics depends on public space, democratic action needs public space
iris marion young key public space idea
public spaces should not be designed to overprioritise neatness and order. this can unintentionally exclude difference and suppress real democratic engagement. diverse perspectives and conflicting views are essential
pluralism
the coexistence of different identities, ideas and experiences which are essential for democracy in urban settings. allows for authentic participation
contested functions of public space
leisure vs protest
commerce
politics
identity expression
three main concerns of end of public space debate
- repression through surveillance, over policing and restrictions
- commodification as places become about profit not people
- exclusion as places are being redefined for elite groups