knowlege of god Flashcards
(36 cards)
natural theology
knowledge of God based on observed facts and experience apart from divine revelation
biblical reference that suggests natural theology
the heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands- psalms
Bonaventura
- eye of the flesh = sense perception, empiricism, gain knowledge about the physical world
- eye of reason = work out mathematical and philosophical truths using logic
- eye of contemplation = come to knowledge of God through faith
Aquinas
reason and observation of nature are important signposts to God
Cicero
sees the world, stars, planets and come to the conclusion of God
two arguments for observation of the world
teleological argument (design in the world) cosmological argument (causation) -however, these two don't necessarily come to a conclusion of a God of classical theism
explain what Calvin meant by god’s mirror
the creation of the world is a reflection of God. e.g. something beautiful reflects that God is beautiful. However, natural disasters could reflect that God is bad
Calvin of natural theology.
define principle of accommodation
God adopts himself to human needs in order to allow humans to understand something about God. Calvin calls these “sparks of glory”
Calvin on natural theology
sens us divinitatis
humans have an innate sense of God
why does Clavin believe God is universal
even those least likely to believe in God (tribes that are separate from normal society) have religious beliefs.
Calvin in natural theology
seeds of religion
everyone has the potential to become religious and the seeds of religion are everywhere.
Calvin’s quote
‘it is only through scripture that the believer has access to knowledge of the re- deeming actions of God ‘
3 strengths of natural theology
- long tradition in Christianity of humans using reason to work out knowledge of God.
- it is reasonable to believe that a God who lovingly created humans would have made some way for those humans to have contact with him
- the large numbers of people who have faith in God may suggest that there is some point of contact between humans and God
4 weaknesses of natural theology
- Christian knowledge of God is that we learn about God through the person of Jesus
- how can an infinite being be understood by finite humans
- flawed because it uses normal reason to justify God’s existence. Normal reason to justify something that isn’t normal.
- type of knowledge gained is “knowing about” God rather than a personal relationship of faith, ‘knowing of’ God the believers talk about.
for Augustine and Calvin why does natural theology not work
humans are innately sinful and since human nature is corrupt, any revelation would also be tainted by human sinful nature. This means our reason is corrupt to
what does acts 17 suggest
that natural theology can take us so far about knowledge of God but we can’t know him personally
summaries what Bruner says in the Barth-Brunner debate
- know God through nature (conscience and sensus divinitatis)- natural theology works
- Imagio dei spiritual level is unaffected by the Fall so there is still communication between God and humans.
- Natural theology is possible but limited- humans need God to reveal himself.
- True knowledge of God can only come by God’s revelation of Christ, through grave and faith.
summarise what Barth says in the Barth-Brunner debate
- can’t understand God as he is infinite, humans are finite.
- No longer made in the image of God due to the fall. can’t communicate with God
- no point of contact as reason can’t be trusted
- only know anything of God if he chooses to reveal it to us
- true knowledge of God is found in the bible
explain why Barth was too influenced by his times
- Nazi’s had appealed to the natural order in society to justify mass exterminations - explain why he was so suspicious of reason
- counter argument that his experiences of mass killing is why he doesn’t trust reason
- his view of faith over reason could lead to fideism
define fideism
knowledge depends on faith
problem of fideism
- you can use it to justify any action. E.g. terrorism
- 2 opposing views. Which one is true if both people say their action was out of faith.
- fideism is self defeating. If it claims to be true, it must have a truth test. Yet if offering justification for a belief, he/she is no longer a fideist.
- link to Bonhoeffer civil disobedience. You only know God’s will in the moment of action
revealed theology
theology that has been given directly by a supernatural deity or messenger
Calvin on revealed theology
revealed theology is needed as human nature is tainted so we need God to reveal himself to us
Catholicism view on revealed theology
- the fall confused and distracted the desire for God
- natural theology is useful but we also need divine revelation or revealed theology