L1 - Conserving dwindling biodiversity Flashcards
(9 cards)
What has become a dominant argument for the conservation of biodiversity, especially in politics?
Describe an important review of this
What task must therefore be taken to protect biodiversity?
- The converted economic value of biodiversity
The Dasgupta Review:
- economy depends on nature, rather than being separated
- Need to map biodiversity and track it’s change
Describe the two most basic approaches to species range mapping
Describe the downsides to each one
Evaluate when and why they are useful
Extent of Occurrence (EOO):
- Draw the minimum convex hull around data of known locations
- Can vary significantly with outliers (see diagram in notes)
Area of Occupancy (AOO):
- Create grid + count no. of pixels containing points
- Depends heavily on pixel size
- Both crude but straightforward + easily replicable, don’t require large data needed for statistical models
How are EOO and AOO models used by international conservation organisations?
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) use these
- Loss of species range size calculated by superimposing land-use change maps onto range maps
- Species then classed into threat status
- “Red lists” used by governments for decisions e.g. protection of Cod in 90s
- Regions with high frequency of endangered organisms identified
What is the alternative, often more sophisticated, way to map species range? Describe how these are made
What limits the widespread use of this?
Statistical model distributions
- Presence and absence species data paired w/ environmental data to produce predicted probability of occurrence via logistic regression
- Makes better range maps than EOO + AOO of >15 records available (environmental records?)
- Not widely used by IUCN as often < 15 data records
What impact are humans having on species extinction rates?
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment showed increased rate of extinction set to accelerate
- Current rate surprisingly low at 0.01% species per year but still 1000 times higher than in fossil record
- Far higher no. with threatened extinction
What explains the trend of very increased no. of threatened species but relatively lower extinction rate?
Sketch a graph of area sampled against species sampled
Give evidence for this relationship
Species-Area Relationship (SARs) crucial:
No. species = b (Area Sampled)^z
(z<1, typically 0.25)
So percentage extinction rates = 1/4 (percentage habitat loss)
E.g. Simberloff’s Experiments of reducing mangroves with chainsaw + monitoring invertebrate diversity
Sketch a graph of persistence probability vs percent habitat remaining for multiple rarities of plant + describe
- Widespread plants have high persistence probability until very little habitat remaining
- Rarer plants decrease much more rapidly
Give a reason why even SAR models often over-estimate extinction rates in the short term?
What’s the implication of this all?
Population may be destined for extinction but slowly dwindles
Nature is resilient but potential extinction crisis looming as land use hits critically low values
Give 4 main points to outline how human impact can be reduced
1) Identify priority areas
- Biodiversity hotspots identified
- Different criteria possible e.g. high endemicity + high habitat loss
2) Government commitments to biodiversity conservation
- E.g. COP15 established 30% of land and oceans protected by 2030
3) Developing networks of protected areas
- E.g. create corridors
4) Ensure organisms are properly protected in these areas