L13 - Drug Discovery and Development Flashcards

(51 cards)

1
Q

4 stages of new drug development

A
Basic research and target selection (3 years)
Preclinical research (3 years)
Clinical development phase 1-3 (6-7 years)
Regulatory review (1-2 years)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

New drug development research is carried out by

A

Large pharmaceutical companies

Contract research organisations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Drug discovery - target selection

A

Receptors
Enzymes
Transport proteins

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Drug discovery - lead finding

A

Invitro assay performed on an expressed human gene that generates the target
Amenable to high throughput screening practices - fast, reliable and reproducible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Drug discovery - lead finding techniques

A

Read out of receptor activity using light absorption techniques
Monitor enzyme activity
Automated screens against chemical libraries
Specific interaction between drug and identified protein target

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Drug discovery - lead molecule optimisation

A

Improve target specificity
Improve potency and affinity to drug target
Pharmaceutical and pharmacokinetic properties
Reduced safety liabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Toxicology and safety of the molecule - lead selection - exploratory toxicology

A

General toxicity in silico and in vitro – how drug interacts with different proteins
Preliminary genotoxicity – will drug cause mutations
Preliminary toxicity in vivo – animal experiments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Toxicology and safety of the molecule - lead selection - exploratory safety

A

Off target binding profile – unexpected effects
Preliminary CV safety
Preliminary CNS safety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Toxicology and safety of the molecule - preclinical development - regulatory toxicology

A

50% of drugs fail
Genotoxicity – how drug interacts within mammals
Toxico/pharmacokinetics
General toxicity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Toxicology and safety of the molecule - preclinical development - regulatory safety

A

Respiratory
CV safety
CNS safety
Must maintain GLP – good laboratory practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Toxicology and safety of the molecule - clinical development - regulatory toxicology

A

Carcinogenicity
Reproductive/juvenile toxicology
Immune-phototoxicity abuse studies
Repeat dose toxicity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Drug discovery - exploratory studies - in vitro - mutagenicity

A

Ames test
Various strains of salmonella cannot grow on a media that is missing histamine
If bacteria grow, drug may have caused mutations that reverse this effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Drug discovery - exploratory studies - in vitro - arrhythmia biomarker

A

Look to see if the drug can interfere with hERG potassium ion channel
Drugs that bind to this channel give rise to Long QT syndrome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Drug discovery - exploratory studies - in vivo

A

Repeat administration for 14 days in animal model

Every tissue in animal model will be compared to an untreated animal under microscopy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Preclinical - biomolecule vs small molecule

A

Both undergo 1-3 and 6 month studies

Range finding and developmental toxicity studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Small molecule – 70%

A

1 year non-rodent
Genotoxicity studies – how the host immune system reacts to the drug
Carcinogenicity and route specific studies
o

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Biomolecule – 30%

A

Immunogenicity – how the protein will be accepted by the host
Action dependent
Post translation modifications occur – cant use predication as you can with small molecules
Don’t expect toxic metabolites so safety precautions easier
Don’t enters cells so can’t cause mutations
Need to check its binding in every single tissue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Small molecule time scale

A

Time 4.5–5 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Biomolecule time scale

A

Time 2-2.5 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Preclinical - goals of non-clinical safety evaluations

A

Toxicity
Toxicokinetics
Maximum non-toxic dose and minimum affective dose
Dose selection for first use in humans
Identification of specific monitoring requirements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Preclinical - general toxicology - clinical pathology

A

Changes in haematology/clinical chemistry
Changes in kidney and liver function
Changes in blood coagulation

22
Q

Preclinical - general toxicology - pathology

A

Large organ toxicity

23
Q

Preclinical - animal toxicology - small molecules

A

Must adhere to the 3R’s – reduce, refine, replace
Rodent – rat
Non rodent – beagle

24
Q

Three dose groups

A

Low – no toxicology
Intermediate
High – toxicology expected in target organ

25
Preclinical - animal toxicology - biopharmaceuticals
Off target toxicology uncommon Adverse reactions - Exaggerated pharmacology – due to high specificity of the molecules - Anti-drug antibody response - Accelerated clearance - Prolongation of exposure - Neutralise the pharmacological activity
26
Preclinical - immunotoxicology - small molecule
``` Unexpected and due to off target effect Indicators in standard toxicology Haematological change Weight change Histophathology – spleen, lymph node, infections ```
27
Preclinical - immunotoxicology - biopharmaceutical
Thorough understanding required to anticipate risk Infusion reaction Cytokine storm – when drug injected for the first time Immunosuppression Autoimmunity
28
Immunotoxicology example
Monoclonal antibody developed by TeGenero Designed against receptor on T cells aim to switch the receptor on to treat Leukaemia Dose – 500 times lower than minimum dose tested in animal models Within 1 hour the patients collapsed – cytokine storm (full blood transfusions as treatment) 1 amino acid change which was not identified in the animal model caused this effect
29
Preclinical - safety pharmacology
Any undesirable effects on physiological functions Cardiovascular system – in vitro and in vivo Central nervous system – rat Respiratory system – rat
30
Preclinical – CNS pharmacology – Irwin activity screen
3 dose levels + control group – observe for 4-6 hours Physical factors and gross appearance Observation of behaviour o In novel environment o In response to stimuli Measures recorded during supine restraint Grip strength, motor coordination and locomotor activity Bizarre behaviour Seizures
31
Preclinical - cardiovascular pharmacology
In vitro electrophysiology to screen for QT prolongation – hERG assay In vivo assessment of QT – non rodent CV telemetry
32
Preclinical - genetic toxicology
In vitro and in vivo tests designed to detect compounds that induce genetic damage Damage to DNA - E.g. gene mutation, chromosomal damage, recombination - Predicts potential for malignancy or genetic effects Ames test sufficient for first administration in human (single dose)
33
Preclinical - pharmacokinetics
AMDE – elimination studies not necessary before FIK Drug metabolism - In vitro and In vivo - Looking for species specific metabolites
34
Conclusions before human trials
Evidence of pharmacological activity Maximum non-toxic dose Adverse effects on target organs Relationship of effects to dose and exposure Differences observed in different species Evaluation of risk in humans
35
Why is regulation needed - Elixir sulfanilamide – 1937
Contained Diethylene Glycol, killing 107
36
Why is regulation needed - Sulfathiazole tablets – 1941
Contained the sedative Phenobarbital, killing 300 | Control deficiencies in the plant and irregularities in the firms attempt to recall the drug
37
Why is regulation needed - Thalidomide – 1962
Sleeping pill caused severe birth defect of arms and legs 1954 - first synthesized 1957 - launched sleeping tablet Contergan 1961 - withdrawn from markets
38
Clinical trials phase 1
Is it safe How well is it tolerated What are the pharmacokinetic properties How well is the drug is reaching its intended target
39
Clinical trials phase 2
Few hundred patients How much should be given to be effective How well does the treatment work in people with the condition
40
Clinical trials phase 3
1000+ patients Definitive results Multi-centre and multi-national trials Patients continually monitored for toxic side effects – individual variability seen Patients also given placebos and other previously used drugs Application for approval and marketing
41
Phase 4
Post marketing surveillance – helps direct the labelling of the product Detect rare or long term adverse effects
42
5 withdrawn drugs
``` Sibutramine Propoxyphene Drotrecogin alfa Rimonabant Hydromorphone ```
43
Sibutramine
Appetite suppressant | Heart attack and stroke
44
Propoxyphene
Opioid painkiller | Heart attack and stroke
45
Drotrecogin alfa
Sepsis | No benefit
46
Rimonabant
Anti-obesity drug | Severe depression and suicide
47
Hydromorphone
Narcotic painkiller | High risk of accidental overdose with alcohol
48
% success rate of new drugs
11% of all drugs that go through this process succeed Cardiovascular drugs have the highest % success rate CNS drugs have a lower % success rate
49
Commercial problems
20% of new drugs are failing on a commercial basis - not economically viable Should now be improving as companies better align functions
50
Clinical efficacy problems
30% of new drugs do not help the problem | Target identification and validation wrong
51
DMPK problems
10% of new drugs do not have the pharmacokinetic properties we need