L8: Instrumental Ax Flashcards

(62 cards)

1
Q

purpose of instrumental assessment

A

to inc objectivity of ax w enhanced documentation and ability to review results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

use of instrumentation to provide…

A

more detail regarding swallow anatomy and physiology

ex. videofluroscopy, endoscopy, manometry, ultrasound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

instrumental ax provides capacity for…

A

fine grained analysis of rapid seq of swallowing events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

choice of instrumentation dependent on the

A

type of info desired/needed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are the goals of instrumental ax? (6)

A

to assess movements patterns of swallow-related structures in UADT (form inferences re: physiologic integrity)

to assess swallowing-related movement patterns of structures in UADT

to identify airway compromise and inefficient swallowing

to identify and describe pooled secretions

to conduct cursory eval of eso anatomy and physiology

to gather info to inform clinical recos (route of nutrition, safest oral dietary level, need for mods/interventions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

when is an instrumental study indicated? (4 reasons)

A

clinical exam fails to fully address clinical qs (HLE is only item predictive of swallowing physiology from clinical exam)

direction for swallowing rehab is needed

nutritional or resp issues raise suspicion of dysphagia

to identify other factors contributing to dysphagia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

when is an instrumental study not indicated (3 reasons)

A

no longer has dysphagia complaints

pts condition too medically compromised, or unable to participate in eval

examination would not alter clinical course or management

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) =

objective?

preparedness?

A

also known as modified barium swallow (MBS)

objective = to obtain visualization of UADT during swallowing

must known radiographic anatomy, able to identify imp swallowing physiology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what does VFSS examine?

A

study of safety and efficiency of swallow

assesses bolus flow thru oral cavity, pharynx, and cervical eso

antomic and/or physiologic abnoramlities can be identified

effects of modifications in bolus size/texture, pt positioning, compensatory strats, and sensory enhancements are evaluated to determine optimal swallow safety and efficiency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

VFSS should not be

A

performed independently

best if radiologist is present, if not may need to request input - re: if suspected anatomical or eso abnormalities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

4 major aims of VFSS

A

assess valves (lips, VP, laryngeal x2, pharyngoesophageal)

assess bolus flow thru chambers (oral, pharynx, eso)

identify asp and the cause of asp

identify strats to optimize safety and efficiency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what equipment is needed for VFSS?

A

x ray= fluroscopy tube, table, monitor, PPE for xray

monitor, digital acq device, microphone

contrast medium, water, thickener, foods

disposable cups/utensils

PPE for infection control

equipment for positioning pt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

5 technical considerations for VFSS

A

contrast/brightness of image

imaging modes (cont vs pulsed, we want 30 pulses per sec)

spatial and temporal resolution (30 frames per sec)

contrast agent (barium conc = 20-40%)

safety and radiation exposure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

safety and radiation exposure is dependent on

A

equipment, set up, maintenance

proper utilization

radiology statff’s knowledge/training

proximity to radiation source

PPE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

PPE for radiation includes

A

lead apron, thyroid guard, eye protection, +/- gloves, dosimeters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

4 steps of protocol for VFSS

A

lateral view: standing or seated

anterior view in upright or habitual position

comm VFSS findings to pts, family, team members

write report

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

describe the lateral view of VFSS “standing or seated”

A

rest position = check for structural abnormality, abnormal movements

speech production = look for movement of articulators

dry swallow

food presentation

compensatory maneuvers (ex. postural changes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

describe the anterior view of VFSS in upright/habitual position

A

observe structural symmetry, vallecular and pyriform residue, lateral pouches, sym of bolus flow

elevate mandible and check VF position and adduction

repeat most diff consistencies

may repeat cup swallow if suspect lateral pouch

may repeat most effective compensatory maneuvers to confirm efficacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what are the 4 food consistencies for VFSS?

A

thin liquid = IDDSI 0

thickened liquid = mildly thick - IDDSI 2, mod thick IDDSI 3

puree = extremely thick, IDDSI 4

solid (cookie) = reg IDDSI 7

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

volumes used during VFSS

A

1/2 tsp
1 tsp
10 ml
sip
seq swallows
1/2 cookie

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

presentation of consitencies/vols during VFSS depends on

regardless…

A

which protocol you adhere to

regardless of protocol it should be standardized (consistent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

MBSImp Lateral view 10 steps

A

5 ml thin via tsp (dont rate)
5 ml thin via tsp
sip thin cup
seq sips thin from cup
5ml nectar thick via tsp
sip nectar from cup
seq sips nectar from cup
5ml honey thick via tsp
5ml pudding via tsp
1/2 cookie w 3ml pudding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

MBSImp anterior/posterior view 2 steps

A

5ml nectar via tsp
5ml pudding via tsp

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

DIGEST lateral view 5 steps

A

2x 5ml thin (IDDSI 0)
2x 10 ml thin (IDDSI 0)
2x cup sips thin (IDDSI 0)
2x tsp pudding (IDDSI 4)
2x 1/4 cracker/cookie (IDDSI 7)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
VFSS procedure 3 important considerations
optimal sit is to view entire aerodigestive tract from lips to C7 view prior to, during, and after each swallow to check for residue and potential for asp note spontaneous cough, throat clearing, or dry swallow after each swallow (if no spon behaviours observed, instruct pt to cough as you observe)
26
what should we know about thin liquid on VFSS?
1/2 tsp, 1 tsp, 10 ml, sips from cup (in ped cases use bottle) self feeding if appropriate vol inc until/unless asp occurs (implement strategies to eliminate asp, if successful move to next vol) changing vols allows evaluation of the mechanism's ability to modulate based on vol (want allow pt to take thing liquids orally as many vols as possible)
27
thin liquid is ...
the best consistency to define the reason for asp and amount of asp in first few swallows most easily asp but least likely to block airway - should reduce pts fear of swallow pneumonia may be less likely to occur from asp of liquids vs thicker foods less likely to have residue that would impeded visualization of further swallows
28
for thin liquids we want to start with...
small amounts initially pts can be v ill, have poorer resp status, be aspirators >1tsp of barium in lungs can result in complications including resp arrest
29
what should we know about thick consistencies on VFSS?
1/2 tsp, 1 tsp, sips from cup mildy thick, mod thick, extremely thick self feed if appropriate if asp occurs intro treatment strategies may need to place material further back on tongue surface if cant manage transport thru oral cavity or cant' take from spoon (eliminate challenge of ingestion and then assess swallowing safety and efficiency)
30
what should we know about solids on VFSS?
1/4 cookie, 1/2 cookie, bread (tsp) brittle material (shatters), material requiring mastication if can manage these solids, intro mixed consistencies (ex. fruit cocktail) any materials the pt reports as being diff to manage (w/i reason)
31
compensations... goals?
treatment efficiacy trial - specific to indv options that fit his/her particular swallow profile goals: to establish safe, efficient oral feeding immediately to identify therapeutic targets
32
how do we analyze and interpret VFSS?
offline analysis slow speed, frame by frame many ways to organize observations
33
radiation from xrays considerations:
ionizing radiation = considered hazardous bc it interacts w matter, can alter or break molecular bonds manners of exposure: medical, enviro, occupational
34
medical radiation exposure can
contribute sig to one's lifetime accumulated dose needs to be prescribed by a physician (balance risks/benefits)
35
enviro radiation exposure includes
materials in water, soil, and air are naturally radioactive; radioactive emissions from the sun and stars
36
occupational exposure includes
radiation of humans (diagnostic, therapeutic, research)
37
VFSS radiation exposure = ALARA =
0.04-1.0 ALARA = as low as reasonably achievable
38
what are the limitations of VFSS?
invasive (radiation exposure) lack of correspondence to real-life eating context poor visibility of secretions can't assess sensation or pressure dep upon image quality must be mindful of freq
39
FEES =
fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing historically viewed as an effective adjunct to VFSS; many now view FEES as the procedure of choice particularly for some pts can be used both in assessment and treatment
40
how can FEES be used as an additional approach to asses the pharyngeal phase of swallowing?
to detect asp and determine safety of oral feeding in pts for whom VFSS was diff or impossible ex. portability, positioning, behavioural cooperation, extremely ill (w inc risk of asp), timing of examination
41
what is the protocol for FEES?
w pt in upright or habitual position intro scope, physical exam of structural movements food/liquid presentation (senstivity testing by ENT) intervention
42
describe what is done during the physical examination during FEES?
scope passed thru inferior meatus first view VPP closure (speech tasks, dry swallow) scope is passed into oropharynx
43
what is being looked for during oropharynx exam on FEES?
saliva in hypopharynx, appearance of pharynx/larynx, postion of epi dry swallow, breath hold, cough, phonation (vocal fold adduction, symmetry of VFs)
44
what is done during sensitivity testing for FEES?
w tip of endoscope touch pharyngeal walls, laryngeal surface of epi, aryepiglottic folds, arytenoids this stimulus is much stronger than what is associated w swallow = could set off laryngo spasms which could interupt airway
45
FEESST =
fiberoptic endoscopic eval of swallowing w sensory testing
46
what are we looking for during FEES of the velopharyngeal valve? how is it assessed?
20 mm^2 for oral sounds, 100mm^2 in hypernasal speech, 0mm^2 during swallow assess using: sustained vowel, sustained /s/, sentence w/o nasal sounds, dry swallow, thin liquid to identify leaks look for symmetry and contributions of various structures
47
what are we looking for during FEES of the pharyngeal chamber? how is it assessed?
BOT retraction w a pharyngeal fricative (cant assess during swallow) check pyriform sinuses, pharyngeal walls, BOT and postcricoid region for pooled sections (poor sensation and/or poor ability to clear) pharyngeal constriction w pitch elevation head rotation to evaluate closure of unilateral hypopharynx
48
what are we looking for during FEES of the laryngeal valves (w lower scope position)? how is it assessed?
VF adduction and voice quality w sustained vowel change in VFs, laryngeal elevation and pharyngeal constriction w pitch glide tight VF adduction w breath hold - also medialization of FVFs, approx of arytenoids to epi throat clear/cough
49
describe food presentation for FEES
measure amounts of food/liquid given to pt administer ice chips, then 5ml and 10 ml volumes of liquids and purees, and solids (might administer smaller amount of water if pt at great asp risk) all dyed w green/blue food colouring for contrast
50
what are we observing during FEES?
bolus hold to assess premature spill (location of bolus at onset of pharyngeal swallow) penetration/asp bf swallow onset of laryngeal elevation and closure after swallow = residue (if residue look for 2nd swallow then cue, if residue on VFs watch for cough/throat clear, then cue and second swallow) penetration/asp after swallow ability to manage secretions determine efficacy of compensatory maneuvers
51
analyze and interpret FEES with...
off-line analysis slow speed, frame by frame many ways to organize observations
52
limitations for FEES
risks: vasovagal response, epistaxis (nosebleed), allergic rxn to anesthetic can't asses oral chamber or eso white out at height of swallow can't judge degree of BOT retraction, pharyngeal constriction, UES opening, HLE penetration/asp during swallow is inferred
53
final thoughts about FEES...
detailed info of the anatomy/phys of the pharyngeal stage food presentation not necessary can proceed even when challenges present - re: mental status, ability to hold posture, ability to swallow on cue, accessing radiology can answer the q: can this pt swallow safely?
54
6 indications for VFSS
unknown medical etiology; vague symps (need comprehensive view) visualize submucosal anatomy (ex. cervical osteophytes) assess oral stage/BOT movement UES stricture/hypertonicity examine movement of multiple structures at height of swallow laryngectomy w complaints
55
9 clinical indications for FEES
visualize surface anatomy, mucosal abnormalities VP incompetence visualize laryngeal movement/VF motility severe dysphagia; need conservative exam (ex. compromised pulmonary clearance) clinical q of secretion management sensitivity pharyngeal symmetry extended therapeutic exam needed/desired biofeedback desired
56
6 logistical indications for FEES
fluroscopy not available, wait time transportation to fluroscopy too risk (medically fragile) transportion to hospital is problematic family input during exam is desired positioning is problematic concern about radiation
57
what are 4 other instrumental techniques?
pharyngeal manometry (pressure) electromyography (muscle activation) (surface EMG = sEMG) Cervical auscultation (sounds) pulse oximetry (O2 conc)
58
pharyngeal manometry =
solid state pressure sensors - react to pressure changes during pharyngeal swallow catheter placed transnasally (tongue bases, UES, cervical eso) requires simultaneous VFSS to determine etiology of pressure changes
59
electromyography (EMG)=
timing and relative amp of muscle contractions during swallow surface EMG most common app - electrodes placed on surface of skin under dhin or above thyroid cart - gaining popularity as biofeedback
60
cervical auscultation =
use of listening device to assess sounds related to swallowing swallow sounds = laryngeal ascent/descent, bolus thru UES - not consistent! can include sounds of resp can be used as an adjunct w other techniques
61
pulse oximetry =
eval of arterial o2 saturation during swallowing hyp = asp of food into airway causes reflex broncospasm leading to ventilation=perfusion mismatch and O2 desaturation accuracy questionable = how much aspirate needed to dec o2? could be other reasons for dec o2
62
manometry and sEMG can...
contribute valuable data on specific aspects of the swallow include other instrumentation w caution