L9 - Children's Early Conceptions of the Physical World Flashcards

1
Q

What is Piaget’s Constructivist theory?

A

1954
Chaotic perceptual input in infancy
Action is necessary for the child’s construction of knowledge
Late development of conceptual understanding about the world of objects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is nativism - Spelke, Baillargeon

A

Core knowledge hypothesis
Infants possess innate knowledge of object concepts
Core principles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the core principles of nativism?

A

Solidity - No two objects can occupy the same space at one time
Cohesion - Objects are connected masses of stuff that move as a whole
Contact - Objects move through contact
Continuity - Objects move in continuous paths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does developmental change involve?

A

Refinement of core concepts (rather than their radical change) and further changes in additional abilities
E.g. experience fine-tunes knowledge about support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is Karmiloff-Smith’s theory of physical knowledge?

A

Genes specify initial constraints / predispositions that channel attention to relevant environmental inputs
Provide the infant with a non-chaotic system from the outset
Lead to implicit understanding
Developmental change is necessary - change from implicit to explicit knowledge within the domain of physical understanding (representational redescription)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Piaget’s account of object permanence?

A

Object permanence happens late 8-9 months old
Infants have to learn through interaction with the world
When a toy was hidden under the cloth they didn’t know where it was or show interest with the cloth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the A not B error ?

A

Infant searches for a hidden object where they last found it rather than its current location
Occurs 8-12 months
They believe the action of them removing the cloth makes the object appear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does new research tell us about object permanence?

A

Studies that don’t require manual reaching suggest much earlier competencies
Manual search vs looking time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was Baillargeon 1985 drawbridge study?

A

6 months
a) habituation event
b) possible event
c) impossible event
Infants looked longer at the impossible event
Event though the impossible event was more similar to habituation - less novel as they look more at novel things
According to Baillargeon, findings show infants understand abject continues to exist when hidden
Data challenges Piaget

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the alternative interpretations for permanence and solidity?

A

Perceptual persistence (Haith, 1998) - still had the perception of the block being there
Preference for events that display more motion (Rivera, 1999) - longer looking time at the one that’s moving the most because it is interesting
Even without hidden object they still looked longer at the 180 degree rotation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are search errors?

A

Discrepancy between early looking data and later search errors
Infants 2 and older have knowledge but unable to use it to guide their actions
Suggests early cognitive development involves constructing knowledge-action links rather than constructing knowledge itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the possible reasons for search errors?

A

Limited problem solving abilities
Frontal cortex immaturity
Weaker representations that are sufficient to perform in looking tasks, but not in manual retrieval
Early representations are implicit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is representational re-description?

A

Model of cognitive development by Karmiloff-Smith 1992
Implicit, procedural knowledge
Representational re-description - can’t manipulate it
Explicit, declarative knowledge - available to the mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does support develop?

A

Gradual mastery over firs year
Increased sophistication
Role of experience of playing with and placing objects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the children’s naive theory?

A

Conceptual frameworks children spontaneously generate to make explanations and predictions about the world
- Simplifications e.g. adding ED to the end of a word to make it past tense
- Misunderstandings
Resistant to counter-evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the gravity error?

A

Children infer that trajectory of invisibly falling object will be straight down
- tubes task (Hood 1995, 1998)
- persistent error at 2-3 yrs
So much experience with gravity going straight down

17
Q

What is the naive theory that all things must balance in the centre?

A

Children learning about support relations in the balance scale problem
U shaped behavioural performance in balancing asymmetrical blocks
4-5 year olds perform well by trail and error
6-7 year olds stick to naive centre theory of balance and fail (implicit)
8-9 year olds are flexible and switch strategy (explicit)

18
Q

When do children begin to know about object properties like the functional use of things?

A

1 year - exhibiting object function through action
e.g. bring spoon to mouth, cup to mouth
Hunnius and Bekkering 2010 used anticipatory looking - found looked more at correct object use at 6 months
Learning arises through observation