Landmark trials Flashcards
(35 cards)
GALA (Lancet 2008)
” GA vs LA for carotid endarterectomy”
Parallel, multicentre, randomised controlled trial
P - Sx and aSx carotid artery stenosis
I - LA
I - GA
O - CVA, MI, death within 30days
Results:
- No difference between GA/LA in 30 day CVA, AMI or death rates
- Other trials found LA cheaper and lead to better early post-op neurocognitive function
- Choice should be determined by surgeon, anaesthetist and patient
ARISE (NEJM, 2014)
Early-goal directed therapy vs usual care in early sepsis
Multicentre, RCT
P - ED patients with early sepsis
I - Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT)
- – Rx provided by study team trained in EGDT for 6hr period
- **- Arterial line and CVL for Scvo2 monitoring
- **– Rx as per EGDT algorithm*
- *C -** usual therapy
- Rx, care location, monitoring, Ix determined by clinical treating team. Nil Scvo2 measurements allowed during trial period (6hrs)*
O -
- 1o - all cause mortality at 90days
- 2o & 3o - mortality in ICU/mortality at 28days/hospital mortality at 60days, specific cause mortality at 90days, length of stay in ED/ICU/hospital, need/duration mechanical ventilation, vasopressor support, renal-replacement therapy, destination at time of discharge
Results:
- No significant difference in all-cause mortality at 90days
- No significant difference in 28-day or in-hospital mortality, during of support or length of hospital stay
B-Aware (Lancet, 2004)
Risk of awareness - 0.1 - 0.2% general surgical population; increased during cardiac surgery, LSCS, trauma surgery
Multicentre, prospective, double-blind RCT
- *P** - high risk of awareness (n = 2503)
- (Emergency LSCS, high-rish cardiac surgery [LVEF >30%, CI <2.1L/min/m2, severe AS, pulm HTN, pn/off pump CABG), acute trauma with hypovolvaemia, rigid bronchoscopy, significant impairment of CV status and expected intraoperative hypotension requiring Rx, severe end-stage lung disease, PHx awareness, anticipated difficult intubation when awake intubation not planned, known/suspected heavy EtOH intake, chronic benzo or opioid use, current protease inhibitor therapy*
I - BIS-guided anaesthesia (BIS 40 - 60)
C - routine care (whatever anaesthetist chose to do)
O -
–1o - incidence of confirmed awareness
– 2o - possible awareness, recovery times, hypnotic drug administration, incidence of marked hypotension, anxiety/depression, 30day mortlity
(pt recollection of intraoperative events, by use of structured questionnaire - at 2-6hrs, 24 - 36hrs, 30days post-op)
- *Results:**
- 2 awareness cases BIS, 11 usual care
- 43% pt received TIVA
- BIS significantly reduced incidence of awarness cf routine care (82% risk reduction with relaxant GA)
- Reduction in awareness - BIS 0.91% vs usual 0.17%, ARR 0.74% in BIS gp
- However, NNT is 138, with cost of $2200 to reduce 1 case of Awareness
B-UNAWARE (Lancet, 2008)
Single centre RCT, prospective, blinded
P - high risk of awareness, to hhave GA with sevo/des/iso/N2O
(n = 2000)
(Major criteria: long-term anticonvulsant/benzo/opiate/cocaine use, EF >40%, h/o awareness, h/o difficult intubation or anticipated difficult intubation, ASA 4 or 5, AS, end-stage lung-disease, marginal ex tolerance not resulting from MSK dysfunction, pulm HTN, planned oper-heart surgery, daily etoh)
I - BIS-guided anaesthesia (target range 40 - 60)
C - ETAG-guide anaesthesia (end-tidal anaesthetic gas, range 0.7 - 1.3 MAC)
** Alarms for target range used in study to highlight if outside of range**
O - Awareness at 24hrs, 24 - 74hrs, 30days
- *Results:**
- 2 cases of definite awareness in each group
- No difference between groups
- ETAG 0.7 - 1.3 MAC as good as BIS 40 - 60
- Anaesethesia awareness occurred even when BIS and ETAG values were within target ranges
- Findings do not support routine use of BIS as part of standard practice
- May be useful in TIVA cases
- Overall incidence of anaesthesia awareness = 0.2% (95% CI 0.08 - 0.53)
BART (NEJM, 2008)
“Blood conservation using antifibrinolytics in a randomised trial”
(Comparison of aprotinin and lysine analogues in high-risk cardiac surgery)
Multicentre, blinded RCT
P - high-risk surgical pts (n = 2331) (i.e. not just CABG pts
(Surgery requiring CPB - rpt cardiac surgery, isolated MV replacement, combined valve/CABG surgery, multiple valve replacement or repair, ascending aortic/arch surgery)
- *I -** Aprotinin vs TXA vs ACA (aminocaproic acid)
- (Aprotinin - protease inhibitor, TXA and ACA - lysine analogues)*
C - nil
- *O -**
- 1o - massive postoperative bleeding
- –* *Massive post-op bleeding (composite bleeding >1.5L during any 8-hr period or MTP [>10units PRBC within 24hrs])
- Rpt surgery due to haemorrhage
- Cardiac tamponade wihthin 24hrs of protamine administration
- Death from haemorrhage within 30days*
– 2o - all-cause mortality at 30days
Results:
- Early termination of trial due to higher rate of death in aprotinin group (55% increased relative risk of death w/in 30days with aprotinin cf other groups)
- Trend towards increased renal impairment, AMI with aprotinin
- ↑ 30 day death in aprotinin 6% vs. TXA 4% vs. ACA 3.9%. ↑ RR death 1.53
- ↓ massive bleeding in aprotinin 9.5% vs. TXA 12.1%vs. ACA 12.1%
- Despite modest reduction in massive bleeding, aprotinin associated with higher mortality
- Observational studies showa protinin associated ↑ renal failure, CVS and cerebrovascular complications
TRICC (NEJM, 1999)
“Transfusion requirements in critical care”
Multicentre RCT
To determine whether restrictive PRBC trasnfsion vs liberal PRBC transfusion produced equivalent results in critically ill patients
P - ICU patients
I - Transfusion threshold 70g/L (aiming for Hb 70 - 90g/L)
C - Transfusion threshold 100g/L (aiming for Hb 100 - 120g/L)
O - All-cause mortality at 30days
Results:
- Similar 30-day mortality between groups
- However, ↓ mortality in restrictive group with pts:
- Less acutely ill (APACHE score _<_20)
- <55yo
- Significant ↓hospital mortality, cardiac complications, organ failure rates in restrictive group
Recommendations:
- Restrictive transfusion to maintain Hb 70-90g/L in critically ill, except possibly in patients with severe ischaemic syndromes/ACS
SAFE (NEJM, 2004)
“Saline vs albumin fluid evaluation”
Multicentre, double-blind RCT
P - ICU patients (n = 6997)
I - 4% albumin
C - NaCl 0.9%
- *O -** All-cause mortality 28days
- Sub-group analysis = RR death in patients with trauma, RR death in severe sepsis
Results:
- No significant difference in all-cause mortality (P = 0.87)
- No significant different in length of ICU stay, hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, days of renal-replacement therapy
- Sub-group analysis:
- Death in trauma pt = RR 1.36 of death in albumin vs NaCl
- Significance attributed to presence of head injury (mo difference in mortality b/w groups in trauma patients without brain injury)
- Sepsis = RR 0.87 death in albumin vs NaCl
- Death in trauma pt = RR 1.36 of death in albumin vs NaCl
Outcomes:
- Albumin group received less fluids
- Sub-group analysis - possible worse outcomes with albumin in trauma with brain injuy; better outcomes in severe sepsis
NABISH (NEJM 2001)
“National Acute Brain Injury Study Hypothermia”
Multicentre RCT
P - closed head injury
I - Hypothermia (33o) for 48hrs
C - Normothermia
O - Functional status at 6months
Results:
- No difference in functional status - 57% poor outcome, 28% mortality
- Hypothermia group had ↑hospital stay but ↓ ICP
IHAST (NEJM, 2005)
“Mild intraoperative hypothermia duinr surgery for intracranial surgery” or “Intraoperative hypothermia for aneurysm surgery”
Multicentre, RCT
P - WFNS score 1 - 3 with SAH no more than 14days before planned surgical clipping (n = 1001)
I - Intraoperative hypothermia (33C, surface cooling techniques)
C - Intraoperative normothermia (36.5C)
O - Outcome at 90days, GCS assessed at 90days
Results:
- No significant difference between groups for pt undergoing craniotomy for aneurysmal SAH
(no difference stay in ICU/hospital, death rates at followup = 6% in both groups, discharge destination) - Increased post-op bacteraemia in hypothermic group (P=0.05)
Limitations:
- “Good patients” with WFNS Grade 1 - 3
WFNS Score:
- 1 = GCS 15, no motor deficit
- 2 = GCS 13 - 14, no motor deficit
- 3 = GCS 13 - 14, motor deficit
- 4 = GCS 7 - 12, + motor deficit
- 5 = GCS 3 - 6, + motor deficit
HACA (NEJM, 2002)
“Hypothermia after cardiac arrest”
Multicentre, RCT, partially blinded
P - Out of hospital VF cardiac arrest
I - Hypothermia (32 - 34C) for 24hrs
C - Normothermia for 24hrs
O - Neurological function at 6mths, complication rates at 7days
Results:
- Hypothermia group:
- Improved neurological outcomes (55% vs 39%, NNT = 6)
- Reduced mortality (41% vs 55%, NNT = 7)
- No difference in complications between groups
- Trend towards ↑ infection rates in hypothermia (non-significant)
CRASH (Lancet, 2004)
“Corticosteroid randomisation after significant head injury”
Multilcentre, international placebo RCT
P - Head injury pt with GCS _<_14 within 8hours of injury (n = 10,008)
I - IV corticosteroids (48hr methylprednisolone infusion)
C - Placebo
- *O -
- **Death within 2 weeks of injury
- Death or disability at 6 months
Results:
- Trial ceased prematurely due to results
- Higher all-cause mortality at 2-weeks in corticosteroid group [21.1% vs 17.9%, 95% CI 1.09 - 1.27, P = 0.0001]
- Cause of increased risk of death unclear
- *Background**:
- Corticosteroids used for ~30yrs in Rx head injury
- Systemic r/v 1997 - suggested 1 - 2% reduced risk of death with corticosteroids
CRASH-2 (2010)
“Clinical randomisation of an antifibrinolytic in severe haemorrhage”
B/G:
Ax of early administration of short course of TXA on death, vascular occlusive dz and need for PRBC in trauma pt
International, multicentre RCT, placebo
P - trauma pts with or without significant risk of bleeding within 8hrs of injury (n = 20,211)
I - TXA (LD 1g over 10mins then infusion 1g over 8hrs)
C - Placebo
- *O -** All-cause mortality within 4 weeks of injury
- Sub-group analysis (ITT)
- Bleeding
- Vascular occlusion (MI, CVA, PE)
- Multi-organ failure
- Head injury
- Other
Results:
- Significantly reduced all-cause mortality in TXA [14.5% vs 16%, RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 - 0.97, p = 0.035]
- Risk of death due to bleeding significantly reduced [4.9% vs 5.7%, p = 0.0077]
- Same risk VTE with TXA
- Lower risk AMI with TXA
Other:
- Better quality study than MATTERS
- Pt with or at significant risk of bleeding - only 50% received PRBC
- Strong evidence TXA reduces bleeding in multiple different forms of surgery, but some uncertainty remains re: overall mortality + VTE, esp post aprotinin
*
POISE (Lancet, 2008)
“Perioperative ischaemic evaluation trial”
International, multicentre, RCT, placebo, ITT
P - Pt at with or at risk of atherosclerotic disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery (n = 8351)
- *I -** Metoprolol XR
- (Drug started 2-4hrs pre-op, continued for 30days)*
C - Placebo
O - Composite of cardiac death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal cardiac arrest
Results:
- Metoprolol group:
- Significant reduction in MI (4.2% vs 57%, p = 0.0017)
- Significant increase in deaths (3.1% vs 2.3%, p = 0.0317)
- Significant increase in CVA (1% vs0.5%, p = 0.0053)
- Significantly more bradycardia, hypoTN, sepsis
POISE-2 (Lancet, 2013)
“Perioperative ischaemic evaulation”
Blinded, randomised 2x2 factorial design
Allowed separate evaluation of clonidine vs placebo, aspirin vs placebo
P - Pts with or at risk of atherosclerotic disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery (n = 10,010)
- *I -** Drugs given just before surgery and cotninued until 72hrs post-op
- Clonidine
- Aspirin
C - Placebo
O - Composite of death or non-fatal MI at 30days
Results:
-
Clonidine:
- Nil significant reduction in composite outcome of CV death or non-fatal MI
- Non-significant reduction in MI
- Significantly more clinically important hypoTN [47.6% vs 37.1%, P <0.001)
-
Aspirin
- No significant effect on death/non-fatal bleeding
- Increased risk of major bleeding (4.6% vs 3.8%, p = 0.04)
ENIGMA (Anaesthesiology, 2007)
“Evaluation of nitrous oxide in gas mixture for anaesthesia”
Multicentre RCT, partially blinded
P - Pts having non-cardiac surgery for >2hrs (n=2050)
I - N2O (70:30 air)
C - N2O free (80% O2:20% N2)
- *O** -
- 1o - duration hospital stay
- 2o - time in ICU, complications, death at 30days
Results:
- Increased long-term risk of myocardial infarction with N2O, but not increase in death or CVA
- N2O - increased wound infection, PONV, atelectasis, fever, pneumonia
- FiO2 different between groups (30% vs 80%)
Issues:
_QUESTION:_ are the results due to N2O or reduced O2? To be answered in ENIGMA-II
Recruitment of relatively unselected pts with low 30-day and long-term event rates –> may have been underpowered to confirm a “true” increased risk of MI in pts receiving N2O
ENIGMA-II (Anaesthesiology 2015)
“Evaluation of N2O in gas mixture in anaesthesia”
International, multicentre, parallel-group, patient and observer-blinded, randomised trial
P - Non-cardiac patients (>45yo) at risk of perioperative CV events
(n= 7112)
I - N2O 70% (30% O2)
C - N2 70% (30% O2)
- O -** Composite outcome of death and major CV events at 1yr after surgery (non-fatal MI, cardiac arrest, PE, CVA)*
- 2o - disability or death, fatal or non-fatal MI, non-fatal CVA
Results:
- N2O does not increase the risk of composite outcome of death and major CV events (disability or death, MI, CVA)
- Supports long-term safety of N2O administration in non-cardiac sugical patients with known or suspected CV disease
MASTER (Lancet, 2002)
“Multicentre Australian Trial of Epidural Anaesthesia”
Comparison of adverse outcomes in high-risk patients managed for major surgery with epidural block or alternative analgesic regimens with GA
Multicentre RCT, ITT
P - High risk pts undergoing abdominal surgery (n = 915)
(Morbid obesity, DM, CRF, respiratory insufficiency, major hepatocellular dz, AMI, myocardial ischaemia, >75yo + 2 other criteria [see study])
I - Intraoperative epidural + post-operative epidural analgesia for 72hrs
C - Control
O - Death at 30days, major post-surgical morbidity
Results:
- No significant difference in mortality at 30 days (epidural 5.1% vs control 4.3%, p = 0.67)
- ↓ risk of post-op resp failure (23% vs 30%, p = 0.02)
- Improved post-op analgesia with EDB
- No major adverse events related to insertion
“Most adverse morbid outcomes in high risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery are not reduced by use of combined epidural and GA and post-op epidural analgesia. However, the improvement in analgesia, reduction in respiratory failure, and the low risk of srious adverse consequences suggest that many high-risk patienst underoing major intra-abdominal surgery and epidural anaesthesia intraoperatively with continuing post-operative epidural analgesia”
IMPACT (NEJM, 2004)
“International multicentre protocol to assess single and combined benefits of anti-emetic interventions in clinical control trial”
Multicentre RCT, double-blinded
Factorial design
P - high baseline risk of PONV (>40% risk) (n = 5199)
- *I -** randomised to 1 of 64 possible combinations of 6 prophylactic interventions:
- Ondansetron 4mg or no ondansetron
- Dexamethasone 4mg or no dexamethasone
- Droperidol 1.25mg or no droperidol
- Propofol or volatile anaesthetic
- Nitrogen or N2O
- Fentanyl or remifentanil
O - PONV at 24hrs
Results:
- Ondansetron, dexamethasone and droperidol ↓ PONV 26%
- Propofol ↓ 19%
- Nitrogen ↓12%
- Remifentanil vs. fentanyl no difference
- Best risk reduction = TIVA propofol + triple anti-emetic = 70% risk reduction
PACMAN (Lancet, 2005)
“PAC in the management of intensive care patients”
Multicentre RCT
P - ICU patients (n = 1040)
I - PAC
C - No PAC (option to use other CO monitoring device)
O - Mortality, complications
Results:
- No difference in hospital mortality between groups
- 46/486 complication rate with PACs, none fatal
- No clear evidence of benefit or harm in using PAC
- Require further efficacy studies
MAGPIE (Lancet, 2002)
“Magnesium for prevention of eclampsia”
International, multicentre RCT, semi-blinded, ITT
P - Parturients with BP >140/90 + proteinuria >+1 (_>_30ml/dL), not yet delivered ot <24hrs post-partum
(n = 10,414)
I - Magnesium
C - Placebo
O - Eclampsia, fetal death (in women randomised before delivery)
Results:
- 58% reduced risk of eclampsia in MgSO4 group (0.8% vs 1.9%, 95% CI 40 - 70)
- Non-significant reductionin maternal mortality in MgSO4 (RR 0.55)
- No clear difference in risk of fetal death pre-partum
- 24% side effects MgSO4 cf placebo (5%)
- 5% increase risk of LSCS
- “MgSO4 halves the risk of eclampsia, probably reduces the risk of maternal death. There do not appear to be substantive harmful effects to mother or baby in short term”
- No tocolytic or hypotensive effect
COMET (Lancet, 2001)
“Comparative obstetric mobile epidural trial”
Double centre RCT
P - Women requesting labour analgesia (n = 1050, primips)
I - Epidural bolus
I - low dose CSE
I - Low dose infusion epidural
O -
1o - Mode of delivery
2o - Labour progress, efficacy of procedure, neonatal complications
Results:
- NVD rates higher in low-dose infusion group
(42. 9% vs 42.7% CSE vs 35.1% traditional bolus; p = 0.04)- Differences due to reduced intrumental vaginal delivery
- APGARS _<_7 and neonatal resuscitation higher in infusion epidurals
** Low-dose epidural infusions benefits delivery outcome
NICE-SUGAR (NEJM, 2009)
“Normoglycaemia in intensive care evaluation survival using glucose algorithm regulation”
Multicentre RCT
P - Pt expected to require Rx in ICU for _>_3 days (n = 6104)
I - Intensive glucose control (target 4.5 - 6mmol/L)
C - Conventional glucose control (_<_10mmol/l)
O - All-cause mortlity within 90days
Results:
- ↑ death in tight control (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02 - 1.28; p = 0.02)
Similar for operative and non-operative pts - ↑hypoglycaemia in tight control (6.8% vs 0.5%, p < 0.001)
- No significant difference in length of ICU/hospital stay, length of mechanical ventilation, renal-replacement therapy
TTM (NEJM, 2016)
“Targeted temperature management at 33oC vs 36oC after cardiac arrest”
International, multicentre RCT
P - Unconscious, OOHCA (n = 950)
I - TTM 33oC
C - TTM 36oC
O -
1o - all-cause mortality to end of trial
2o - composite poor neurological function or death at 180days
(Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] Scale and modified Rankin Scale)
Results:
- No significant difference in all cause mortality (50% 33C vs 48% 36C, hazard ratio 33oC 1.06, 95% CI 0.89 - 1.28, p = 0.51)
- No significant different in neurological outcome/death at 180days (54% 33C vs 52% 36C, risk ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.88 - 1.16, p = 0.78)
ARDSNet (NEJM, 2000)
“Ventilation with lower tidal volume as comparted with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome”
Traditional tidal volume 10 - 15ml/kg
Multicentre, RCT
P - Pt with acute lung injury and ARDS (n = 861)
I - VT 6ml/kg predicted body weight, airway pressure <30cmH2O measured after 0.5sec end-expiratory pause
C - VT 12ml/kg predicted body weight, airway pressure <50cmH2O measured after 0.5sec end-expiratory pause
O -
1o - death prior d/c home and death prior to breating without assistance
2o - No. days without ventilator use from days 1 - 28
Results:
- Trial prematurely ceased due to significant reductionin mortality in low VT group (31% vs 39.8%, p = 0.007)
- Reduced no. of ventilator days in low VT group (p = 0.007)