Language Flashcards
(52 cards)
What are the 3 key hypotheses presented in lectures regarding the emergence of language?
Give a brief description of each
Why Only Us hypothesis (Berwick & Chomsky, 2016): language restricted to Homo sapiens and emerged in the last 300 000 years.
- Gradual hypothesis: language emerged within Homo with Mode 2 technology around 1.75 Ma.
- ‘The Much Older hypothesis’: before 1.75 Ma?
What are the 3 key areas that can be explored in the fossil record which can be used to examine the emergence of language in detail
auditory capacity
cognition
vocal tract
What do you call brain mapping
Brain parcellation
What are cortical areas
Cortical areas: regions defined by their microstructural architecture, functional specialization, connectivity or topographic organization (Brodmann’s areas, BA).
What are the key parts of the brain associated with language?
Where are they located ?
Broca’s cap: located in the inferior frontal gyrus and formed by BA 44 (pars opercularis) and BA 45 (pars triangularis).
- Wernicke’s area: located in the posterior part of the superior temporal gyrus, and part of BA 22.
- Both located in the dominant cerebral hemisphere for language (right/left, left in 95% of living humans).
What are the structural and shape characteristics of the Broca’s cap and the Wernicke’s area?
Broca’s cap: ascending and horizontal branches of the lateral fissure delineate BA 44 and 45.
Wernicke’s area: proximity of the lateral end of the lateral fissure.
Asymmetries: the Broca’s cap and the Wernicke’s area (represented by the planum temporale) are larger in the dominant hemisphere for language.
Can we see symmetries in Broca’s areas in non-human animals?
Asymmetries of the Broca’s cap and planum temporale in other great apes.
BUT a different organization of the Broca’s cap in other great apes (fronto-orbital sulcus).
What is the organization of Broca’s cap in sediba
Australopithecus sediba (2.0 Ma) - chimpanzee-like pattern (fronto-orbital sulcus (Carlson et al., 2011))
Do early Homo show human-like pattern
Homo rudolfensis (2.1-1.8 Ma) - two branches (Falk, 1983)
Homo habilis - (2.6-1.7 Ma) - fronto-orbital sulcus (Falk, 1983)
What are the language centres like in later Homo brains
Neandertals
(0.197-0.039 Ma)
two branches
(Bruner et al., 2008)
Homo naledi
(0.3-0.2 Ma)
two branches
(Holloway et al., 2018)
Describe the pattern of asymmetries in hominin evolution
Gradual increase in the degree of expression of asymmetries of the Broca’s cap:
same pattern as in extant humans and great apes but different magnitude!
Why is Wernicke’s area hard to track in human evolution?
What can we tell?
Temporo-parietal region poorly represented in the fossil record.
• Strong development of the inferior parietal lobule (including Wernicke’s area)
in Homo habilis? (Tobias, 1987)
Summarise the evidence for language from the endocast in australopithecines, early Homo, and later Homo
Australopithecus:
primitive Broca’s cap
some asymmetry of Broca’s cap
N/A regarding Wernicke’s area
early Homo: Broca’s cap organisation is a mix of primitive and derived
increased asymmetry of Broca’s cap
Wernicke’s area appears to be more derived (as seen in habilis skull)
later Homo:
derived Broca’s cap
pronounced asymmetry
little information on Wernicke’s area
What is an audiogram
What does a modern human audiogram look like
Why is this important
Audible thresholds for specific frequencies.
• Modern human audiogram: lowered high-frequency cutoff and high sensitivity
in the low to mid-frequencies as compared to other primates
Hearing variability partly related to forms of vocalization
What is interesting about earlier hominin ossicles
Why is this important
Australopithecus africanus and Paranthropus robustus ossicles: a derived malleus with primitive incus and stapes.
Primitive incus: decrease in auditory sensitivity shared with the other primates
except humans.
Describe Neanderthal ossicles
What does this suggest
same functional parameters of the ossicles than in anatomically modern humans but different morphology.
• Similar auditory sensitivity, same hearing capacities, same vocal communication?
What was the bandwidth like in later Homo
Broad bandwith in Homo heidelbergensis and modern humans with similar means
What is interesting about Paranthropus’ inner ear
increase in the oval window area and specific cochlear shape.
• Functional adaptations for hearing sensitivity?
Very different to Homo - May need to distinguish between Paranthropines and humans
Describe the Oval window and cochlea in Homo erectus and modern Homo
What does this suggest
large cochlea and oval window,
increased low frequency sensitivity emerged less than 2 Ma
Longer-range communication?
What can cochlear length be used to estimate
a good estimate of low-frequency sensitivity
How do Premodern (Homo erectus) and modern human cochleae differ from australopiths and catarrhines
why is this special
cochlear relative lengths and oval window areas
larger than expected for their body mass, two features corresponding to increased low-frequency sensitivity
uniqueness of the “hypertrophied” cochlea in the genus Homo (quotation from
How does the Cochlea in Homo heidelbergensis compare to modern humans
What does this suggest functionally
small cochlear volume.
• Higher upper limit of hearing compared to modern humans (lower high frequency cutoff)?
Martinez et al., 2019
What did Conde-Valverde et al., 2021 find in relation to the Neanderthal inner ear? What is the functional significance of this?
results show that the occupied bandwidth of Neanderthals was greater than the Sima de los Huesos hominins and similar to extant humans, implying that Neanderthals evolved the auditory capacities to support a vocal communication system as efficient as modern human speech
Give a review of the auditory capacities of fossil hominins
Address middle and inner ear and how this will impact auditory capacity
early hominins:
primitive middle ear
specific inner ear to different species
capacity is primitive with some specificities
early Homo:
middle ear generally unclear
inner ear: derived
capacity: emergence of the lowered high-frequency cutoff
later Homo:
middle ear - derived
inner ear - derived
capacity - same vocal communication?