Language and culture final Flashcards
(119 cards)
Theoretical principles:
Looks for universal principles, it focuses on form and structure, and it works to develop universal, generalizable rules and are not concerned with the effects of social cultural and linguistic behavior
Comparative linguistic perspective:
we can trace how a language was developed based on how people lived
*Ferdinande de Saussure:
ather of linguistics, argument was that if you want to study a language, you need to bring the language in a separate setting, and a separate language from other languages - study the language isolated, by itself
Language:
the language system in the abstract
Parole
everyday speech
Noam Chomsky
- Competence: The abstract and usually unconscious knowledge that one has about the rules of language
- Performance: the putting into practice of the rules
- However - for the purpose of this class the above section is wrong
- We like these two:
(Katherina Clark and Michael Holquist) Words are socially charged lives… (Alessandro Duranti) language is …not only a mode of thinking….but a form of social action (Language always takes place in a social action - anthropological view, must consider the context in which language takes place)
Anthropology is:
1) field based, 2) holistic (the four concentrations, bio, ling, arch, and culture, and 3) comparative
*Comparing:
the diversity of what it is to be human and the potential underlying patterns that link us as a species
-Cultural relativity
words and language are culturally bound, we cannot generalize
(Boas idea) Field-Work:
spending time in another cultural system is the best (and possibly the only) way of gaining an insider’s understanding of that system
Article: Color, do you see what I see?
- Universalists: people see and name color in a similar way
- Relativists: who believe in a spectrum of experience and who are often offended by the very notion that Westerner’s sense of color might be imposed on the interpretation of other cultures and languages
- Article: the sound of language:
*Metaphor:
s understanding and experiencing one kind of thing in terms of another and the concepts that govern our though are not just matters of the intellect. They are govern our everyday functioning, down to the most mundane details
- We don’t just talk using metaphors, but also at by them
- Human language, thought, and activity are large metaphorical
Perception
response and ignores different types of stimuli
Categorise
filter out the unimportant
Relativism
understanding each culture for their own definition of color (concept from the article about colour
Language use with Guugu Yimithirr & Kuuk Thaayorree,
that it does not matter where in the world you are because you look for north, south, east, and west, geographical language, not egocentric
Environmental determinism
*Steven Pinker: argues that geographical features shapes ones language, and the language is merely a reflection of geography
*Linguistic reality, 3 ideas
- 1) Languages are different
- There is no underlying commonality
- 2) They are arbitrary systems
- There are no reasons behind how things were created, no relationship with the material things
*3) Knowing one language does not allow you to predict how another language will categorize and name the world
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
never published, but it is commonly known in combination between
*Strong Sapir
his is not testable, but argues that Language is a prison, fundamentally different, it is impossible to understand
*Weaker Whorf:
language is a room, open the door and you can understand the person with another language
-As such, language is more predispositional rather than determinative since you can understand a situation without word-by-word explanation. Therefore, language does not completely determine but it does affect the predispositional understanding of our previous cognition
Language Thought Cognition
are multidirectional, they all influence each other
Hypocognition
lack of ideas that you need for talking or thinking about something