language, thought, and communication Flashcards
communication
passing information from one person (or animal) to another
language
a system of communication used by a specific group of people
thought
the mental activity of thinking, which involves reasoning and considering, and that produces ideas and opinions
piaget’s theory: language depends on thought
- believed that cognitive development leads to the growth of language
this means that we can only use language at a level that matches our cognitive development
- sensorimotor stage: babies learn to copy sounds
- preoperational stage: voice their internal thoughts
- concrete operational stage: ability to use language has developed a lot but only used to talk about concrete things
- formal operational stage: language can be used to talk about abstract theoretical ideas
piaget’s theory evaluation
+ the sample was his children so they didn’t realize they were being observed and therefore their behaviour was natural
- the sample was mainly his children so it cannot be generalised to all children
- no interobserver reliability
- sapir-whorf hypothesis had more evidence to support it
sapir-whorf hypothesis
language affects our thoughts and behaviour
the language that we speak:
- impacts the way we understanding certain things
- makes some ways of thinking easier
- makes it easier to recall certain things
evidenced by their research through the Hopi tribe (who had different types of words for time) and the eskimos who had a large number of words for snow.
sapir-whorf evaluation
- unreliable as eskimos have the same number of words for snow as English speakers + Whorf never met anyone from the Hopi tribe
- People who grow up without a language, or who lose the ability to speak are still able to think
variation in recognition of colours
sapir-whorf hypothesis suggests that the language we speak leads us to focusing on certain ways of seeing things
- the tarahumara have one word for blue and green, researchers found that english speakers perceive bigger differences between shades of blues and greens than them
- russian has different words for lighter and darker blues, researchers found that they were quicker to recognise the difference between two shades of blue than english speakers
variation in recall of events
the sapir-whorf hypothesis suggests that our ability to recall certain info is affected by the language that we speak.
researchers studied how english and spanish speakers described intended + accidental actions.
vase being knocked over.
- intended: both groups identified the person doing it
- accidental: both groups recalled the people involved, but english speakers had a much better memory of who was involved in the accident.
4 main reasons animals communication
- survival: use alarm calls to warn others of the presence of predators
- reproduction: displays involving colour to attract a mate
- territory: monkeys use eye contact to show dominance
- food: bees use dance-like movements to tell each other where to find food
territory
an area defended by an animal or group of animals against others
posture
the positioning of the body, often regarded as a non-verbal communication signal
touch
a form of non-verbal communication in which info is conveyed by physical contact between people
von frisch’s bee study aim
to investigate how bees communicate the location of a food source to each other
von frisch’s bee study design
field experiment carried out in real-life environment of the bees, researcher still manipulates the IV, but there is limited control of EV
Von frisch’s bee study method
food sources (container of sugar-water) for a hive of bees was placed at different locations
a hive with glass sides was used to observe the bees behaviour.
when the bees visited the food sources they were marked with different colours of paints.
the researcher recorded the movements of the bees when they returned to the hive
von frisch’s bee study results
bees were observed to make different movements depending on how far away the food source was
- if it was less than 100m they did a round dance to the right and left
- if it was more than 100m they did a waggle dance: the number of turns correlates to the distance, the straight part of the dance is the position of the food in relation to the current position of the sun
von frisch’s bee study conclusion
concluded that bees use a variety of different movements to communicate to each other the distance and direction of food sources
von frisch’s bee study evaluation
+ other researchers have repeated the study they found the same results, consistency + reliability
+ some of the earliest research into animal communication, encouraged other to carry out research
- gathering sugar-water out of containers is not natural behaviour for bees, therefore low ecological validity. + however, when places on flowers instead of containers the bees acted in the same way
properties that are only part of human communication
- productivity: the ability to communicate an unlimited number of different messages
- displacement: the ability to communicate about events that will happen in the future
evaluation of properties of communication
- difficult to know which properties of language are exclusively used by humans
- research (koko the gorilla) suggests that animals can use properties that are ‘only’ used by humans, this is not a natural behaviour. they may be simply imitating humans
- ethical issues with holding animals in captivity and training them
verbal communication
conveying messages using words e.g talking to someone
non-verbal communication
conveying messages without the use of words: including aspects if speech e.g tone, pitch, volume and visual cues such as eye contact and body language
functions of eye contact
- regulating the smooth flow of conversation: research with pairs of participants conversating, some were wearing dark glasses, more pauses and interruptions
- pupil dilation expresses emotion: young men shown almost identical pictures of the same girl, they picked the one where her pupils were more dilated, their pupils dilated as well
- signal of attraction: people prefer those who look at them more frequently