Later years Flashcards
(165 cards)
Describe Elizabeth I’s approach to defining her royal prerogative after 1588.
Elizabeth I aimed to clearly define her prerogative to prevent attempts to undermine it, despite facing discontent from a new generation of parliamentarians regarding her privileges.
What was the significance of the case of Dr. Roderigo Lopez?
The case of Dr. Lopez, who was executed for allegedly plotting to poison Elizabeth I, illustrates the ease with which hostility towards foreigners could arise during wartime.
Define the social and economic problems faced in England during the 1590s.
The 1590s were marked by poor harvests, rising grain prices, plague outbreaks, and increased vagrancy, leading to significant social and economic distress.
What accusations did Essex face after meeting Tyrone?
Essex met Tyrone alone, leading to accusations of treachery following his actions.
What was the consequence of Essex returning home against orders?
Essex returned home against his orders, rushing into the royal presence when Elizabeth was only just out of bed and without wig and make-up.
What role did apprentices play in the riots in London?
Apprentices rioted regularly in London, with notable riots by felt makers in Southwark in 1592, in Bow in 1593, in Southwark again in 1595, and on Tower Hill.
What issues arose regarding the raising of troops during Elizabeth’s reign?
The raising of troops was disliked, leading to frequent desertions, minor mutinies, such as at Gloucester in 1602 when officers attacked, and reluctance to pay for uniforms/weapons; the quality of troops enlisted was poor, as fitter men had already been taken off to fight.
What food riots occurred during Elizabeth’s reign?
Food riots took place in Kent in 1595 and in Sussex, Somerset, and Norfolk over the next three years; similar disorders occurred in Ipswich in 1586.
Explain the response of the House of Commons to Elizabeth I’s use of purveyance in 1593.
In 1593, the House of Commons requested remedies for grievances over purveyance as a response over purveyance, which Burghley, claimed infringed on royal prerogative, but Elizabeth acknowledged the issue and agreed to investigate.
How did Peter Wentworth’s actions challenge Elizabeth I’s prerogative regarding succession?
Peter Wentworth wrote a pamphlet urging Elizabeth to instruct parliament to examine succession rights, leading to his imprisonment for discussing parliamentary business outside the Palace of Westminster.
What was the outcome of Wentworth’s attempts to address succession rights in parliament?
Wentworth was imprisoned for his actions and ultimately died in the Tower in 1597, with Elizabeth’s prerogative remaining intact as she feared naming a successor could lead to conspiracies.
How did the economic situation influence the debate on monopolies in parliament?
The weak economy and ongoing taxes exacerbated public discontent, leading to increased pressure on Elizabeth regarding the monopolies that were seen as detrimental to the populace; agitators even pressed petitions into her hand as she went to her chapel.
What was the reaction of royal councillors to the parliamentary debate on monopolies?
Royal councillors were alarmed by the intensity of the debate over monopolies, indicating concern over the potential challenge to Elizabeth’s authority; monopolies lived on to be an issue under James I.
Define the term ‘purveyance’ in the context of Elizabeth I’s reign.
Purveyance refers to the royal prerogative allowing the monarch to requisition goods and services, which became a point of contention in Elizabeth I’s later years.
Describe the relationship between Queen Elizabeth I and Parliament after 1588.
Relations with Parliament declined after 1588, despite Elizabeth summoning four parliaments during this period, which was more than for any other similar period of her reign.
Explain the financial challenges faced by Elizabeth I after the Spanish Armada.
The war with Spain required revenue far beyond Elizabeth’s ordinary income; initially, in the flush of victory over Spanish Armada in 1588, parliament voted generously, but heavy taxes needed became more onerous and later parliaments less ready with their consent.
How did the House of Commons respond to the need for war funding in 1589?
In 1589, the House of Commons set up a committee and agreed to levy an unprecedented two subsidies and four tenths and fifteenths, which was twice the usual grant.
What was the outcome of the 1593 Parliament regarding military funding?
In 1593, with ongoing danger and despite worries about creating a precedent, the House of Commons agreed to a double subsidy and four tenths and fifteenths. Although the Lord Treasurer (Burghley) believed it was insufficient, it was convention that HoL could only agree to amount proposed by HoC or reduce it.
Define the role of Lord Burghley in the funding discussions of the 1590s.
Lord Burghley suggested a conference between the Houses to address funding needs, explaining a grant of 1589 had brought in €480,000, whereas E had spent over a million pounds.
How did Sir Francis Bacon’s views on taxation differ from those of other council members?
Sir Francis Bacon argued for spreading the tax burden over six years, while Privy Councillors and Sir Walter Raleigh opposed this view; Bacon out of favour/forbidden to come to court.
What was the significance of the 1597 Parliament in terms of financial grants?
In 1597, despite threat of famine, HoC responded to the urgent pleas for funding, as Elizabeth needed taxes to maintain her armies and navy; had sold crown lands, raised loans from the wealthy and levied ship money but still needed funds.
Describe the financial situation at the final Parliament of Elizabeth I in 1601.
The final Parliament in 1601 was cooperative over money, agreeing to four subsidies to address a deficit of £140,000, although Bacon and Raleigh sought to reduce the tax burden on the poorest.
What criticisms did the government face regarding its treatment of Puritans?
There were criticisms of the harsh treatment of Puritans in 1589, as Whitgift continued his campaign against radicals, labeling them as ‘false prophets’.
Explain the measures taken against Roman Catholics and Puritan dissenters in 1593.
In 1593, the government implemented measures requiring Roman Catholics to remain within five miles of their homes to prevent them from joining forces of Catholicism.