Law Flashcards
(35 cards)
Duration - Berne Convention minimum
Life + 50 years
Duration - foreign works
Same as country of origin
Principle of “comparison of terms” rather than “national treatment”
e.g. CA work has Life + 50 years even in UK
Duration - LDMA general
Life + 70 years from end of calendar year in which author dies (s.12(2))
Duration - LDMA joint
Life + 70 years from last author to die (s.12(4))
Duration - co-authored songs
As joint LDMA, Life + 70 years from last author to die (s.12(8))
Duration - computer-generated LDMA
50 years from end of year in which the work was made (s.12(7))
Duration - industrially produced works of artistic craftsmanship
Life + 70 years
Used to be 25 years, but s.52 CDPA repealed
Duration - perpetual copyright
Peter Pan Schedule 1, para 1, 3 CDPA
Royalties to GOSH, even though author died in 1937
Duration - unknown authorship
70 years from date of creation, or date on which made available to public (s.12(3))
Duration - Films
Life + 70 years, from last to die of:
principal director
author of screenplay
author of dialogue
composer of music (specially created for and used in the film)
OR 70 years from end of year in which the film was made available to the public (s.13B(4)(b), (10))
Rememeber Norowzian v Arks - protected as dramatic work
Duration - sound recordings
50 years from end of year in which recording was made
OR
70 years from year of publication, C2P, played in public
Duration - broadcasts
50 years from when the broadcast was first made
Duration - typographical arrangements
25 years from year of first pubilcation
Duration - Database rights
15 years from completion, or making available (sui generis DB right)
Infringement - Primary
Exclusive/restricted action w/o consent
Strict liability - knowledge and intention irrelevant, innocence defence only in relation to remedies (BUT: GS Media - presumed knowledge in linking cases)
Two requirements:
1. DERIVATION (causal connection) - independent creation allowed, proof by D if inferred from similarity
2. OBJECTIVE SIMILARITY
(c) work, or substantial part thereof
Infringement - (Substantial) Part
UK: substantial part (s.16(3) CDPA)
EU: part (Art. 2(a) InfoSoc)
Infopaq - part amounts to infringement if it contains expression of AOIC
Pelham - recognisable to the ear (2s), no de minimis requirement
Need to balance interests of (c) holder and user
Infringement - Secondary
Those that deal in or facilitate the production of infringing copies (i.e. not directly involved in infringing acts) Import, possess, sell/let, exhibit, distribute, supply article designed/adapted for making copies, permitting a place to be used for infringing performance, supplies/gives permission for apparatus Knowledge requirement (or reason to believe) - put on notice to satisfy, "should know" arguments not sufficient (Superdry)
Infringement - Fair Dealing Defence
Research/private study s.29(1) and (1C)
Criticism/review s. 30(1) - published works only, w/acknowledgement
Quotation s. 30(1ZA) - published works only, acknowledgement, no more than necessary, intention to enter dialogue
Reporting current events s. 30(2) - national/political/sport, contemporary issue
Parody, caricature or pastiche s. 30A(1) - no ack/originality, must 1) evoke while noticeably different, 2) expression of humour/mockery
Illustration for instruction s.32
Merely that D has made use of work, no need for transaction Purposive list (except re. quotation) - specified purposes assessed objectively Driven by pubic interest
Infringement - Defences (EU)
Transient acts (mandatory) Closed list of optional exceptions Art. 5(5) - 1. special cases only 2. must not interfere with normal exploitation 3. must not unreasonably prejudice legitimate interests of right holder Purposive approach - fair balance New mandatory exceptions in (c) Dir: Text/data mining, online teaching/distance education, digital preservation (lib, heritage archives)
Infringement - Temporary acts of reproduction
Art. 5(1) InfoSoc, also s.28A CDPA, enablement of browsing/caching
Transient/incidental, and an integral and essential part of a technological process, and whose sole purpose is to enable:
a) transmission between third parties by intermediary
b) lawful use
.. of a work, which has no independent economic significance
Fairness - Factors
Quantity and quality of what is taken (defence usually only if part taken)
Addition/transformation (esp. for criticism, quotation, parody) likely to be fair
Commercial benefit weighs against fairness
Impact on market for the work, competition
Unpublished work? Criticism, review, quotation does not apply
How the work was obtained (legitimately? Yeland)
Motives, dishonest?
Could the purpose have been achieved by different means?
Infringement - Defences, General Terms
Non-commercial/NFP users
Lawful user or acquirer (Oracle)
Sufficient acknowledgement
Contract cannot override, certain contractual provisions will be void/unenforceable
No private copying defence in UK
Infringement - Defences (UK)
Public Interest
Incidental Use
By/for people with disabilities (Marrakech directive)
Infringement - Remedies
Damages - lost sales, comparable licence fees/”willing licensor/ee”, not for innocent infringement (s.97(1))
Flagrancy damages, moral prejudice (mental distress, humiliation)
Injunctions, accounts
Delivery up
Seize infringing copies/other articles
Criminal offences - fine/up to 10y prison