Law in Action Flashcards

(61 cards)

1
Q

doli incapax

A

child who isn’t capable of understanding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

6 punishments

A

rehabilitation
incapacitation
retribution
deterrence
general
specific

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

rehabilitation

A

trying to fix cause rather than end result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

incapacitation

A

letting person not do things, similar to jail

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

retribution

A

punishment should hurt and be bad enough to reflect what society believes has been done wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

deterrence

A

making punishment harsh enough that they won’t do it again

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

general

A

trying to ensure that other people in community won’t do it, general law/punishment
e.g. death sentence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

specific

A

they won’t do it again
specific to person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

warning

A

given by police when alleged offence is not serious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

cautions

A

more serious than warnings
happens at police station

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

judge

A

ensures rulings and procedures are followed
oversees procedural fairness and sentences perpetrators
sometimes determine facts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

witness

A

person who has seen or heard something relevant to the case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

prosecutor

A

decides what evidence is necessary to convince court that offence has been commited beyond reasonable doubt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

magistrate

A

judge in local court
always determine guilt or innocence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

accused

A

person who is accused of crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

plaintiff

A

prosecutor in civil case
brings claims for damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

respondent

A

accused in civil case
respond to claims for money

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

appellent

A

party who disagrees with decision appealing to higher court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

expert witness

A

witness with experience in field of crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

jury

A

group of 6 to 12 people who determine facts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

negligence

A

when someone has not taken reasonable care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

common law action

A

australia never defined or made a law about it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

duty of care

A

responsibility to make sure that they and other poeple are safe in workplace

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

breach

A

when person’s conduct fails to meet applicable standard of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
causation
plaintiff shows that breach in duty of care was cause of injury and losses
26
harm
what came out of breach in duty of care must not be far fetched of fanciful
27
4 parts of negligence
duty of care breach causation harm
28
damages
civil cases money's payment (fine)
29
4 types of damages
restitution future economic loss punitive non-economic loss
30
restitution
restores person as though accident didn't happen
31
future economic loss
amount which person would have received in lifetime is calculated and paid by respondent
32
punitive
damages to deter others and punish someone
33
non-economic loss
monetary compensation for non-money things
34
proof in civil cases
balance of probability above 50%
35
proof in criminal cases
beyond reasonable doubt
36
parts of contract
offer acceptance consideration
37
offer
invitation to enter into contract on certain terms
38
acceptance
compliance with terms of offer made by another person
39
consideration
promise, performance or forebearance bargained by promisor in exchange for promise
40
capacity
do they know enough about legal world to enter into contract
41
verbal contract
established through words rather than written and documented
42
if person is under 10
no criminal charge ever
43
crime needs
guilty act and guilty mind
44
groups in warnings
suggest planning/premeditation
45
eligibility for cautions
determined by type, nature and seriousness of offence alagations
46
decision on whether to give caution
police decide if it is in interest of justice
47
maximum number of cautions
3
48
if child does not appear for official caution
police can institute criminal proceedings
49
recommended age of criminal responsibility
14
50
how many court cases are juries used in
3-4% of cases local courts don't have jury
51
delay in assembling jury
accused person being in jail for months without trial
52
innocent inmates in NSW
10 000 inmates 4000 innocent
53
6 advantages of jury
represent community values keep judges accountable will judge peers fairly ensure confidence in justice system good for rights to be upheld have educational value and experience of being on jury shows real nature of system
54
disadvantages of jury
slow don't know law make mistakes have prejudices don't understand legal process
55
civil case
civil action brought by plaintiff against repondent
56
contracts must have
intention to create legal relations
57
requirement to enter contract
only people in conscious state of mind can enter contracts
58
if offer is made and not accepted
contracts is not created or legally binding
59
backing out of contract
if it results in loss of money compensation is necessary
60
why do courts step in
to ensure fair outcomes
61
if lying in advertisement
must be outrageous customers fault for believing them