LAWS1000 Fall Review Flashcards
(43 cards)
Jurisprudence
- The theory or philosophy of law
Artifactualism
- Delvins theory
- Recognizes that law is just a social construct
- Law is capable of reorganization and modifications
- Artifactualism: recognizes that it is impossible to conceive of law without reference to the social values reflected in, and enforced by, law.
- Important: there is however nothing separate or “out there” about law.
- Artifactualists claim that Realists exclude certain structural commonalities of the judiciary. For example, their homogeneity in terms of class, race and gender.
- Artifactualism posits that law is best understood as the complex product of a host of interacting social forces.
- Artifactualists emphasize that law is about power;
- Not only a reflection of the power relations in our society, but that it simultaneously constitutes and legitimizes those power relations.
- Power is seen as relational because it is negotiated (although unequally) between the different communities in a society.
- Law is not simply perceived as an instrument of the power elites: it is conceptualized as a terrain of struggle over the meaning and quality of societal existence.
Natural Laws
- It claims to be universal
- The validity of law depends on the content, not just the form
- Connections between moral and law
- Natural law is superior to human laws
- Provides moral and legal arguments for obedience -> law is only valid if its in accordance with the right reasons
- Encourages us to pursue the good
Some Criticisms… - Not as universal as it may seem
- Inherently ambiguous
- Too general, abstract, or vague to offer any real or practical legal solutions
- No rational way to know whats right or wrong
- Hume – you’ll shape law based on your ideology -> common good – who you exclude from your common good, ect.
Legal Positivism
- Analytical jurisprudence
- The content of law also depends on the social constructs, not just its merits
- Aspires to be a scientific account of law
- legal and moral become distinct. Speculations about the essence of stuff, including justice, is discouraged. What matters are positive Laws, as enforced by the State.
Max Webber
- Laws enacted by legislators and modified by the court decisions, define criminal behaviors and specify the sanction imposed for violations…
Mala in se
- Things that most people would consider evil
Informal Social Control
- internalized group norms
- no leader or official group mechanism
Formal Social Control
- The use of universal sanctions
- Securing conformity in a systematic and visible way -> military, stuff like that
Formal Social Control
- The use of universal sanctions
- Securing conformity in a systematic and visible way -> military, stuff like that
What is the “Job” of Law?
- Negotiating and settling disputes
What is the most highly structured formal system?
- Criminal sanctions
- Criminal sanctions are Laws enacted by legislators and modified by the court decisions, define criminal behaviors and specify the sanction imposed for violations…
Hoebel
- Thought that law is at the center of how a society is organized
Hoebel and Llewellyn’s Five Basic Law Jobs/ Functions of Law
- Law disposes of trouble in society by dealing with minror cases
- Law regulates conflict by dealing with opposing interests -> laws role is to produce and maintain order
- Law helps decide and regulate institutions of governance and to allocate authority
- Law helps organize society as a whole
- there is a law that maintains and trains and regulates other tools and people charged with performing other law jobs
Emile Durkheim
- (Distinction between primitive and complex society on the scale of their specialized labors; Law is moving from repressive to compensation and even restoring measures). Topology of Solidarities, evolving.
Ratio Dicidendi
- The grounds for the decision
What does the Butler Test deal with? Wha are the tests that came out of this case?
- The Community Standards Tolerance Test: now what you personally can not handle, but what you wouldn’t want other Canadians dealing with
- The Degradation or Dehumanization Test:
1. Notion of Harm - Materials which portray people in positions of subordination, servile submission or humiliation run against equality and dignity of all persons—even with consent (constitutional limitation)
2. 3 Categories of Porn: with Violence, without but degrading, neither…
What is the arbiter?
- the “community” as a whole
“Artistic Defence” and “Internal Necessity”
- The question is - is the undue exploitation of set the point of the work?
- Artistic rest on the freedom of expression, and must be upheld
What is the key notion in the degradation test?
- The notion of harm -> materials portray people in positions of subordination, servile submission or humiliation run against equality and dignity of all persons—even with consent (constitutional limitation)
POGG
- Peace, order, and good governance
- principle informing “residual powers” -> the power to enact laws not assigned to provinces
- It is a principle derived from 1867
Ultra Vires
- “beyond the powers”
Positive Law
- statues that have been laid down in legislature
The Perka Test
- The test used to see if you can use the defence of necessity
- Imminent peril or danger
- No reasonable legal alternative
- Proportionality in harm inflected/avoided
- In sum, the legal option=
choice=voluntariness=criminal act
Obiter Dictum
- the judges incidental expression of opinion