leases, mortgages, co-ownership Flashcards

(82 cards)

1
Q

πŸ’‘ What are the three essential features of a lease?

A

1) Exclusive possession, 2) Certainty of term, 3) Intention to create legal relations.

leases + licences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

πŸ’‘ What is exclusive possession?

A

The right to exclude all others, including the landlord, from the premises.

leases + licences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

πŸ’‘ Can a lease be created verbally?

A

Yes, if for ≀ 3 years and takes effect in possession (LPA 1925 s.54(2)).

leases + licences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

πŸ’‘ What is a licence?

A

A personal permission to occupy land, not creating proprietary rights.

leases + licences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

πŸ’‘ How do courts distinguish between lease and licence?

A

By substance: exclusive possession + term = lease, regardless of label.

leases + licences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

πŸ“š Street v Mountford [1985]

A
  • Exclusive possession = lease. Labels and forms do not determine legal nature.
  • facts: landlord claimed the occupier had a licence not a lease to avoid tenant protection
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

πŸ“š Aslan v Murphy [1990]

A
  • Sham clauses (e.g., landlord keeping key) don’t prevent exclusive possession.
  • agreement stated β€˜occuier could use room part of the day’ and landlord retained a key

leases + licences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

πŸ“š Antoniades v Villiers [1990]

A
  • courts cpnsider substance over form and any sham clause inserted to exclude possession is excluded
  • couple signed two identical documents labelled licences

leases + licences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

πŸ“š AG Securities v Vaughan [1990]

A
  • Different agreements = no unity = licence, not joint tenancy.
  • four occupants signed different agreements at different times

leases + licences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

πŸ“š Bruton v London & Quadrant Housing Trust [2000]

A
  • Lease can exist even if landlord has only a licence, provided exclusive possession is granted.
  • Bruton was granted exclusive possession by a trust that only had a licence

leases + licences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

πŸ“š Prudential Assurance v London Residuary Body [1992]

A
  • Uncertain term = invalid lease.
  • facts: a lease was granted β€œuntil needed for road widening” which granted an uncertain end date

leases + licences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

πŸ“š Mexfield v Berrisford [2011]

A

Lease for uncertain term treated as lease for life = converted to 90 years under LPA.

leases + licences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

πŸ’‘ What is the rule from Prudential?

A

A lease must have a fixed or determinable term to be valid.

leases + licences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

πŸ’‘ What does Mexfield v Berrisford allow?

A

Converts uncertain periodic tenancies into 90-year leases if parties are individuals.

leases + licences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

πŸ’‘ How is a lease of >3 years created?

A

By deed (LP(MP)A 1989 s.1) and registered (LRA 2002 s.27).

leases + licences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

πŸ“œ LPA 1925 s.54(2)

A

Short leases (≀3 years) can be created orally if in possession and at market rent.

leases + licences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

πŸ“œ LP(MP)A 1989 s.1

A

A lease by deed must be signed, witnessed, and indicate it is a deed.

leases + licences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

πŸ“œ LRA 2002 s.27(2)(b)

A

Legal leases over 7 years must be registered to take effect at law.

leases + licences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

πŸ’‘ Can multiple people hold a lease together?

A

Yes, if they have unity of time, title, interest and possession.

leases + licences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

πŸ’‘ What are the unities needed for joint tenancy?

A

Time, Title, Interest, Possession.

Co-ownership and trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

πŸ’‘ Can two people with separate agreements hold a joint lease?

A

No, must be one agreement with unities (AG Securities v Vaughan).

Co-ownership and trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

πŸ’‘ What is a periodic tenancy?

A

Tenancy that renews automatically (e.g., month-to-month), can be implied by conduct.

Co-ownership and trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

πŸ“š Southward Housing v Walker [2015]

A

Lease of uncertain term for social housing not converted under Mexfield.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

πŸ’‘ Can a licence become a lease?

A

Yes, if elements of lease (esp. exclusive possession) are satisfied.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
πŸ’‘ What is legal co-ownership under LPA 1925?
Legal title must be held as joint tenancy by up to 4 trustees (LPA 1925 ss.34 & 36). | Co-ownership and trust
26
πŸ’‘ How is equitable co-ownership determined?
Equity follows the intention of the parties. Can be joint tenancy or tenancy in common.
27
πŸ’‘ How can a joint tenancy be severed?
By notice in writing (LPA 1925 s.36(2)) or by mutual conduct (Williams v Hensman).
28
πŸ’‘ What is the significance of severance?
Severance converts a joint tenancy into a tenancy in common in equity.
29
πŸ’‘ What are the three methods of severance in Williams v Hensman?
Unilateral act, mutual agreement, course of conduct.
30
πŸ“š Stack v Dowden [2007]
Presumption of joint beneficial ownership in joint names can be rebutted by evidence of contrary intention.
31
πŸ“š Jones v Kernott [2011]
Court may infer or impute changing intentions for unequal beneficial ownership.
32
πŸ“š Goodman v Gallant [1986]
Express declaration of shares is conclusive unless varied by agreement.
33
πŸ“š Williams v Hensman (1861)
Identified three ways of severing a joint tenancy.
34
πŸ“š Burgess v Rawnsley [1975]
Oral agreement to sell can amount to severance even if sale is not completed.
35
πŸ“š Harris v Goddard [1983]
Divorce petition not sufficient for severanceβ€”must show immediate intent.
36
πŸ“œ TLATA 1996 s.14
Allows any interested party to apply to court for order relating to sale or occupation.
37
πŸ“œ TLATA 1996 s.15
Court considers factors: intentions, minor’s welfare, creditor interests, circumstances.
38
πŸ“š Mortgage Corporation v Shaire [2001]
TLATA gives weight to family occupation over creditor enforcement.
39
πŸ“š Re Buchanan-Wollaston's Conveyance [1939]
No order for sale where co-owners intended to preserve land use.
40
πŸ“š Bank of Ireland v Bell [2001]
Creditors’ interests can outweigh family occupation rights under s.15 TLATA.
41
πŸ’‘ What happens to a joint tenant’s share on death?
It passes automatically to surviving joint tenants (right of survivorship).
42
πŸ’‘ Can severance occur after death?
No. Severance must occur during the joint tenant’s lifetime.
43
πŸ’‘ Can co-owners hold different types of interests?
Yes, in equity one can hold as tenant in common while legal title remains joint.
44
πŸ’‘ What is overreaching?
When a purchaser pays to at least two trustees, beneficial interests are transferred to proceeds of sale.
45
πŸ“œ LPA 1925 s.2 & s.27
Establish overreaching when purchase money paid to at least two trustees.
46
πŸ“š Quigley v Masterson [2011]
Clear intent to sever via litigation sufficient.
47
πŸ“š First National Bank v Achampong [2003]
Secured creditor permitted sale despite disabled occupier.
48
πŸ“š Re Draper’s Conveyance [1969]
Affidavit in divorce proceedings held as immediate intent to sever.
49
πŸ“š Ali v Hussein [2005]
Court postponed sale due to young children living at property.
50
πŸ’‘ What is the maximum number of legal owners?
Four (LPA 1925 s.34(2)).
51
πŸ’‘ Who manages the trust of land?
Trustees (legal owners) manage the land for the benefit of beneficiaries.
52
πŸ’‘ Can minors be legal owners?
No. Minors cannot hold legal title (Trustee Act 1925).
53
πŸ’‘ What is a mortgage?
A proprietary interest in land given to secure repayment of a loan.
54
πŸ’‘ What are the two types of mortgages?
Legal mortgage (by deed and registered), and equitable mortgage (e.g. by agreement or defective deed).
55
πŸ’‘ What is the right to redeem?
The borrower’s right to recover unencumbered title upon repayment.
56
πŸ’‘ What is a 'clog' on the equity of redemption?
Any term preventing or limiting redemptionβ€”void in equity.
57
πŸ’‘ What is the rule from 'once a mortgage, always a mortgage'?
The mortgage cannot become an absolute transfer of property.
58
πŸ“š Kreglinger v New Patagonia Meat Co [1914]
Collateral benefits allowed unless unconscionable or inconsistent with redemption.
59
πŸ“š Fairclough v Swan Brewery [1912]
Redemption postponed until end of 17-year lease = void clog.
60
πŸ“š Knightsbridge Estates v Byrne [1940]
Long postponement of redemption upheld in commercial context.
61
πŸ“š Cityland v Dabrah [1968]
High interest rate struck down as unconscionable; equity intervenes.
62
πŸ“š Multiservice Bookbinding v Marden [1979]
Index-linked interest upheld; no inequality or bad faith.
63
πŸ“œ LPA 1925 s.101
Gives statutory power of sale if mortgage is by deed.
64
πŸ“œ LPA 1925 s.103
Power of sale becomes exercisable when default conditions are met.
65
πŸ“š Cuckmere Brick v Mutual Finance [1971]
Mortgagee must take reasonable care to obtain market value.
66
πŸ“š Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen [1983]
Sale to connected party must be shown to be in good faith at fair price.
67
πŸ“š Silven Properties v RBS [2004]
Mortgagee need not enhance value before sale (e.g., planning permission).
68
πŸ“š Four Maids v Dudley Marshall [1957]
Mortgagee entitled to possession before default.
69
πŸ“š Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank [2000]
Lender may repossess without court order if mortgagor not in occupation.
70
πŸ“š Palk v Mortgage Services [1993]
Court may order sale to avoid injustice from accruing interest.
71
πŸ“œ AJA 1970 s.36
Court may delay possession if borrower can repay in a reasonable period.
72
πŸ“š Cheltenham & Gloucester v Norgan [1996]
Reasonable time for repayment = remaining term of mortgage.
73
πŸ“š Barclays Bank v O’Brien [1994]
Lender put on inquiry when mortgage not for joint benefit.
74
πŸ“š RBS v Etridge (No.2) [2001]
Lenders must ensure independent legal advice where put on inquiry.
75
πŸ“š Credit Lyonnais v Burch [1997]
Extremely one-sided surety transaction = presumed undue influence.
76
πŸ’‘ What is β€˜being put on inquiry’?
When lender is aware a surety may be subject to undue influence.
77
πŸ’‘ How can a lender protect themselves from undue influence?
Ensure independent legal advice per Etridge guidelines.
78
πŸ“œ LRA 2002 s.27(2)(f)
Legal mortgage must be registered to take effect at law.
79
πŸ“œ LRA 2002 Sch. 3 para. 2
Unregistered interests may override if holder is in actual occupation.
80
πŸ“š Williams & Glyn’s Bank v Boland [1981]
Equitable interest + actual occupation = overriding interest.
81
πŸ“š Abbey National v Cann [1991]
Pre-completion acts do not count as occupation for overriding interest.
82
πŸ“š Link Lending v Bustard [2010]
Temporary absence did not destroy actual occupation.