Lecture 1 Flashcards

(33 cards)

1
Q

Entities that can steer the conduct

A
  • Governments (regulation and taxes)
  • Charities (reward and subsidize)
  • Financiers (ownership rights and funding)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sustainable business

A

Economic activity geared towards improving the environment and society (corporate social responsibility)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sustainable finance

A
  • Providing the capital and cash to business that it needs to operate
  • This includes investing and also insurance & banking
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Sustainable investing

A

The process of incorporating environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into investment decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Paper Schoenmaker & Schramade conclusions

No .. of managing for ..

A

No inclusion of managing for ESG in 2.0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ESG instruments

A

All affect the composition of the investment portfolio

  • Negative/positive screening
  • Integration
  • Impact investing

No change in composition but “active shareholders”

  • Engagement
  • Voting as a shareholder
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Misunderstanding Friedman

A

The business of business is business. Managers of companies are on earth to make a profit. However, shareholders can spend their own money and can make non-business decisions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

3 main types of goals that investors pursue in SI

A
  1. Purely financial goals subject to ESG constraints
  2. Mixed financial and impact goals
  3. Impact goals subject to financial constraints
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Matching investors to SI typology

A

SI 1: screening (not intending to give up results)
SI 2: Integration (not intending to give up results)
SI 3: Impact investing (giving up returns is acceptable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why join a coalition?

A
  • Peer effect: membership of key competitors
  • Outside pressure: consumers and NGOs
  • Reputation: to be seen as leader in sustainability
  • Collective advocacy: coalition can push governments
  • Collective engagement: increases success rate of ESG engagement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Sustainability

A

Concerns the effects on the environment and society of human behavior and of economic activity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Economic activity

A

Conduct of producers and consumers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Traditional investing

A

Goal to achieve the best possible risk-return trade off

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Environmental

A

Pollution, waste & circular economy
Natural resource stewardship
Climate change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Social

A

Human and labor rights
Human capital management
Conduct, culture and ethics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Governance

A

Board effectiveness
Executive remuneration
Shareholder protection and rights

17
Q

Social foundations examples

A
Food security
Adequate income
Access to health care
Access to water and clean cooking facilities
Education
Decent work
Modern energy services
Equality
Political voice
18
Q

Paper Schoenmaker & Schramade conclusions

S&S do not consider ..

19
Q

Paper Schoenmaker & Schramade conclusions

ESG integration according to S&S

A

Optimization over F, S and E (SI 2.1)

20
Q

Paper Schoenmaker & Schramade conclusions

Hard to differentiate integration .. from ..

A

Integration 2.0 from simple F optimization

21
Q

Paper Schoenmaker & Schramade conclusions

In investment industry ESG integration normally means ..

A

Both SI 2.0 and 2.1

22
Q

Paper Schoenmaker & Schramade conclusions

The distinction of .. from .. is blurry. Think of .. as more ..

A
  • SI 2.0 from traditional investing

- SI 2.0 as more long term oriented

23
Q

Paper Schoenmaker & Schramade conclusions

Investors also have investment choices at their disposal that are not part of the S&S investment categorization:

A

(1) voting and (2) engagement, known as “voice”, it emphasizes why investors value G in ESG

24
Q

Paper Schoenmaker & Schramade purpose

A

Identify the aim of investing:

  • Target return without damaging the environment
  • Target environment improve without losing money
  • Something in between
25
Paper Schoenmaker & Schramade method
Making a useful categorization of the field of SI that can be translated in practice
26
Categorization of the field of SI
- Traditional Investing: Risk-return trade-off, only consider ESG if fitting within - Sustainable Investing 1.0: Exclusion (of investments that do poorly by ESG) - Sustainable Investing 2.0: ESG integration (2.0 account for ESG, optimise F and/or 2.1 optimise over F, S and E) - Sustainable Investing 3.0: Impact Investing
27
Impact Investing
Have additional impact on society by making an investment
28
Scheme for paper analysis
Do investment choices that take ESG into account affect ESG results and investment returns , either directly or indirectly through the financial performance of firms and investment projects?
29
ESG Investment choices
Not only choosing from the SI 1.0-3.0 strategies, but also being an active holder of financial instruments ESG Instruments
30
Do investment choices that take ESG into account affect ESG results and investment returns , either directly or indirectly through the financial performance of firms and investment projects? Measures of results
- Financial performance measures: Profitability; EBITDA; Turnover; Cost of goods sold - Investment return measures: Total returns; Return to volatility measures - ESG results measures: Multiple based on improvement of a firm’s ESG factors
31
Sustainalytics & MSCI
- Providers of opinions in form of ESG ratings | - Low correlation; especially for environmental and social aspects, and for smaller companies
32
Sustainable investing coalitions
Similarly to other coalitions, these are intended for reciprocal support in sustainable investment - Develop methods and stimulate companies towards sustainability - Coordinated engagement
33
Consciously owning a stock
- Engagement & voting/stewardship/active shareholder - ESG integration - Impact investing