Lecture 1 Flashcards

1
Q

What is qualitative research?

A

FULL DEFINITION IN SMALLER PARTS:
* begins with the assumption and the use of interpretive/theoretical frameworks that inform the study of research problems by addressing the meaning individuals or groups ascribe to social or human problems
* To study this problem, QR uses an emerging qualitative approach to inquiry, the collection of data in a natural setting, sensitive to the people and places under study, and data analysis is both inductive and deductive and establishes patterns and themes.
* The final written report or presentation includes the voices of the participants, the reflexivity of the researcher, a complex description and interpretation of the problem, and its** contribution to the literature or a call for change **

Keywords:
- Interpretive/theoretical frameworks
- Meaning indvs or groups ascribe to social/human problems (meaning-making - how do people experience the world?)
- emerging qualitative approach
- in a natural setting
- sensitive to people and places
- both inductive and deductive
- voices of participants
- reflexivity of the researcher (understanding own biases)
- complex description and interpretation
- contribution to literature (add to the body of knowledge) VS call for change

Focus on HOW and WHAT ipv HOW MANY
Meaning making, interpretations and perceptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Demonstrate the research process (+ situate philosophy and interpretive frameworks within the research process)

A

PHASE 1: the researcher as a multicultural subject
-> history and research tradition
-> conception of self and the other
-> ethics and politics of research
(perspectives & experiences)

PHASE 2: philosophical assumptions and interpretive frameworks
-> philosophical assumptions: ontology, epistemology, axiology, methodology
-> frameworks: postpositivism, pragmatism, …

PHASE 3: Research strategies and approaches
-> design, case study, ethnography, grounded theory, …

PHASE 4: methods of collection and analysis
-> observing, interviewing, oral history, textual analysis, focus groups, …

PHASE 5: the art, practice, and politics of interpretation and evaluation
-> criteria for judging adequacy, writing as interpretation, evaluation traditions, policy analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why are philosophical assumptions important?

A
  • gives direction to the research goals and outcomes (-> how we formulate our problem and research questions, how we seek information, …)
  • says something about the scope of training and research experience (assumptions = deeply rooted in training and reinforced by the scholarly community in which we work)
  • basis of evaluative criteria for research-related decisions

Philosophical assumptions influence the research question, and affect the type of data collection chosen, …

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Can philosophical assumptions change?

A
  • can change over time and over a career
  • multiple assumptions can be taken during a given study -> but dependent on research experience, openness, and acceptability of ideas taken, …
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the 4 philosophical assumptions?

A
  1. ontology
  2. epistemology
  3. axiology
  4. methodology
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is ontology?

A

= researcher’s view on reality

  • Addresses questions?: What is the nature of reality; what is existence and what does it mean to exist? is there a single reality out there?
  • dominant view in QR: multiple realities, reflected in using multiple forms of evidence (quotes, perspectives, …)
  • evidence of multiple views?
    -> use of multiple forms of evidence in themes using the actual words of different indvs OR/AND presenting different perspectives

! importance? ontology gives direction nat whether 1 single factual reality or multiple => impact on how you design your research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is epistemology?

A

= how the researcher knows reality (= nature of knowledge)

  • addresses questions: what counts as knowledge? how are knowledge claims justified? what is the relationship between the researcher and that being researched?
  • eg. knowledge = something that you can justify; or from observation; or from experiences; or from common sense: or from scientific knowledge; or
  • dominant view in QR: knowledge = based on subjective experiences of people -> ‘first hand’ information from people, getting to know people => researcher attempts to lessen the distance between himself and that being researched (fieldwork)

EG. following stories/trajectories of migrants to understand how the bureaucratic contacts effect integration of migrants in the long-term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is axiology?

A

= the value-stance taken by the inquirer

  • study of values (from pers experience, gender, race, …) + what role do values have in research? -> researchers need to position on values (! need to be made explicitly!)
  • various views in QR: postpositivism VS value-driven (Cresswell)

! need to acknowledge bias ! eg. I acknowledge my privilege to sit at the planning table; I do not realize that my race impacted my participants and my research findings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is methodology?

A

= the procedures used in the study

  • the study of research procedures and methods: focus on the process of doing research
  • views in QR:
    Varies from inductive to deductive
    Researcher studies topic in (social, historical, etc) context
    Emergent research design (inductive reasoning vs deductive reasoning)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is inductive reasoning?

A

observation -> pattern -> hypothesis -> theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is deductive reasoning?

A

theory -> hypothesis -> observation -> confirmation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are paradigms/worldviews/interpretative frameworks?

A

= ‘basic set of beliefs that guides action’; OR theories/theoretical orientations that guide the practice of research

2 categories:
1. social science: shape how the researchers view the problems and data (postpositivism, social constructivism, pragmatism)
2. social justice science: addressing problems or even calling for action in the context of a specific social issue (feminist theory, queer theory, …)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is postpositivism? (general)

A
  • no strict cause and effect BUT cause and effect = probabilities
  • e-: reductionist, logical, empirical, cause-and-effect oriented, deterministic based on a priori theories
  • when used? indvs w prior quantitative research training + to support quantitative research
  • practice?
    -> inquiry = logically related steps + rigorous methods of qualitative data collection and analysis -> multiple levels of data analysis for rigor, employ computer programs to assist, encourage validity approaches, write qualitative in form of scientific reports w structure resembling quantitative articles
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is postpositivism in relation to philosophical assumptions?

A

Ontology:
– A single reality exists beyond ourselves, out there
– Reality = discovered following a series of logically-related steps ->! Researchers may not be able to understand it perfectly!

Epistemology
– Reality can only be approximated/discovered ipv ‘constructed’ – It is revealed through research and statistics
– Limit interaction with research subjects
– Validity comes from peers not participants

Axiology
– Control researcher bias
– No need to explicate them (because they are controlled)

Methodology
– Rigorous scientific methods are important: measuring and objectiving.
– Deductive: theory testing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is social constructivism? (general)

A
  • indvs = seek understandings of the world in which they live and work -> develop subjective meanings of their experiences (= meanings directed towards certain objects or things)
  • goal? to rely on the participant’s view of the situation
  • subjective meanings = negotiated socially and historically -> formed through interaction with others
  • inductive
  • interpretation!
  • practice? broad questions => participant can construct meaning of a situation + focus on specific contexts + closely study participants
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is social constructivism in relation to philosophical assumptions?

A

Ontology
– Multiple realities = constructed through our lived experiences and interactions with others
– Truth = derived from social interactions and experiences around us

Epistemology
– Important to understand how people construct reality, rather than ‘facts’
– Knowledge about reality: co-constructed between researcher and subjects

Axiology
– Individual values of researcher matter: ‘co-creation’.

Methodology
– Aimed at reconstructing subjective meanings of subjects, in context.
– First-hand information
– Inductive and emergent; bottom-up.

17
Q

What are transformative frameworks?

A

= participatory action research

Why used?
- postpositivist impose laws and theories that do not fit marginalized individuals or groups + constructivists = do not go far enough in advocating action to help individuals

Basic tenet?
- knowledge = neutral + reflects the power and social relationships within society -> purpose of knowledge construction = to aid people to improve society

Goal?
- action agenda for reform

Features?
- recursive or dialectical -> focused on bringing about change in practices
- focused on helping individuals free themselves from constraints found in the media, in language, …
- emancipatory -> helps unshackle people from constraints of irrational and unjust structures -> aim? to create a political debate and discussion
- practical and collaborative -> participants help design, …

Encompasses? postmodernism + feminist theory/queer theory/disability theory/critical race theory
-> commonality? all encourage participation of research subjects + reflection on methods + social change

18
Q

What is postmodernism? (general)

A

What?
- focus their critiques on changing ways of thinking ipv calling for action based on these changes

Basic concept?
- knowledge claims = set within the conditions of the world today + in multiple perspectives of class, race, gender and other group affiliations
-> negative conditions: eg. in presence of hierarchies, power, and control by individuals, multiple meanings of language

19
Q

What is postmodernism in relation to philosophical assumptions?

A

Ontology
- There are multiple realities -> Reality = defined by our experiences AND concepts; there is no reality beyond that (no brute facts)
- (further than social constructivism)

Epistemology
– Knowledge = defined through language and social habits
– One’s position, and power structures, = crucial in knowledge development.
– Dominant neo-liberal ideology and discourse; emphasis on marginalized groups.
– Truth is relative to a certain frame of reference. There are multiple ways of knowing

Axiology
- respect for multiple value systems (indigenous values)
– Some value systems need to be problematized: transformative goal, deconstruct language and showing dominations and power structures.

Methodology
– Questioning of methods; meaning is fluid and messy. Be careful with generalizations
– Stress transparency by highlighting issues and concerns

Critique -> downplaying role of scientific knowledge

20
Q

What is critical/social justice in relation to philosophical assumptions?

A

Ontology
– Multiple realities
– Reality = based on power and identity struggles. Privilege or oppression based on race, ethnicity, class, gender, …

Epistemology
– Knowledge influenced by identity
– Knowledge gained through study of social structures, oppression, power.
– Knowledge gained through research can help to change reality

Axiology
– Diversity of values = emphasized

Methodology
– General: Identify social structures that institutionalize social injustice, document that, and call for action and change
– (But quite some variation here)

Eg. unequal opportunities for black males

21
Q

What is pragmatism? (general)

A

What?
- focus on the outcomes of the research (actions, consequences, situations of inquiry)
- concern w “what works” + solutions to problems
- less focus on methods

Basic ideas?
- not committed to any system of philosophy and reality
- freedom of choice for researchers -> free to choose methods, techniques, …
- world = not an absolute unity
- many approaches to collecting and analyzing data
- truth = what works at the time
- look to the ‘what’ and ‘how’ of the researcher based on its intended consequences
- always occurs in social, historical, political, and other contexts
- believe in the external world independent of the mind but also lodged in the mind

Practice
- multiple methods of data collection
- multiple sources of data collection
- focus on practical implications of the research
- emphasize the importance of conducting research that best addresses the research problem

22
Q

What is pragmatism in relation to philosophical assumptions?

A

Ontology
– ‘Reality? Whatever’
– No commitment to a particular view of reality
– Pick a view on reality that works

Epistemology
– Knowledge developed through many research methods
– Use methods that work in that situation

Axiology
– Discuss values if they seem to influence the results
– Discuss or ignore values if needed to realize a particular goal (e.g. to convince the reader or to get published)

Methodology
– Depends on research question, and resources available
– Mixed methods

23
Q

What is pragmatism? (general)

A

What?
- focus on the outcomes of the research (actions, consequences, situations of inquiry)
- concern w “what works” + solutions to problems
- less focus on methods

Basic ideas?
- not committed to any system of philosophy and reality
- freedom of choice for researchers -> free to choose methods, techniques, …
- world = not an absolute unity
- many approaches to collecting and analyzing data
- truth = what works at the time
- look to the ‘what’ and ‘how’ of the researcher based on its intended consequences
- always occurs in social, historical, political, and other contexts
- believe in the external world independent of the mind but also lodged in the mind

Practice
- multiple methods of data collection
- multiple sources of data collection
- focus on the practical implications of the research
- emphasize the importance of conducting research that best addresses the research problem

24
Q

What is feminist theory?

A

What?
- center on and make problematic women’s diverse situations and institutions that frame those situations
- subject? often gender domination
- embraces tenets of postmodern and poststructuralist critiques as a challenge to the injustices of current society

Goals?
- to establish collaborative and nonexploitative relationships
- to place researcher within study as to avoid objectification
- to conduct research that is transformative

Aim?
- ‘to correct both the invisibility and distortion of female experience in ways relevant to ending women’s unequal social position’

25
Q

What is critical theory? (general)

A

What?
- concerned with empowering human beings to transcend the constraints placed on them by race, class and gender

How?
- researchers need to acknowledge their own power, engage in dialogues, and use theory to interpret or illuminate social action
- themes? problems of domination, alienation, social struggles, scientific study of social institutions and their transformations

Methodology?
- eg. inclusion of participatns, encourage people to interact, become activists, form action-oriented groups, help individuals examine the conditions of their existence

End goal?
- social theorizing = “the desire to comprehend + transform the underlying orders of social life”

26
Q

What is critical race theory?

A

What?
- focus on studying and transforming the relationship between race, racism, and power

3 main goals?
1. to present stories about discrimination from the perspective of people of color
2. argues for eradication of racial subjugation + recognizing race = construct
3. addressing other areas of difference eg. gender, class, inequities, …

Practice?
- foregrounds race and racism in all aspects of the research process
- challenges the traditional research paradigms, texts, and theories used to explain experiences of people of color
- offers transformative solutions to racial, gender and class subordination in societal and institutional structures

27
Q

What is queer theory?

A

What?
- explores a myriad of complexities of the construct, identity and how identities reproduce and perform in social forums
- focus on inquiry ipv methodology

Goal?
- to challenge and undercut identity as a singular, fixed or normal
- seek to challenge categorization processes and their deconstructions

Overview?
- both heterosexual/homosexual binary + sex/gender split = challenged
- There is a decentering of identity.
- All sexual categories (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, heterosexual) are open, fluid, and nonfixed.
- Mainstream homosexuality is critiqued.
- Power = embodied discursively.
- All normalizing strategies = shunned.
- Academic work may become ironic and often comic and paradoxical.
- Versions of homosexual subject positions are inscribed everywhere.
- Deviance = abandoned, and interest lies in insider and outsider perspectives and transgressions.
- Common objects of study are films, videos, novels, poetry, and visual images.
- The most frequent interests include the social worlds of the so-called radical sexual fringe (e.g., drag kings and queens, sexual playfulness). (p. 201)

28
Q

what is disability theory?

A

What?
- adresses the meaning of inclusion in schools and encompasses administrators, teachers, parents who have children w disabilities
- focus on disability as a dimension of human difference (social construction) -> not as a defect

29
Q

What are some of the common elements of how interpretive frameworks will be used?

A
  • research focuses on understanding specific issues or topics
  • research procedures = sensitive to participants and context -> eg. no further marginalization, sensitive to power imbalances, respect indvs differences, …
  • researchers = respectful co-constructors of knowledge -> recognition of the importance of subjectivity of own lens, acknowledge powerful position in research, …
  • research = reported in diverse formats and calls for societal change