Lecture 1 Flashcards

(11 cards)

1
Q

What are the core areas of philosophy and ethics?

A
  1. Epistemology: ethics of thought and analysis of knowledge
    - what can we know? What is it to know? When is it rational to believe something?
    - simulation hypothesis: the hypothesis that, for all we know, we are in a simulation; it is logically consistent with our experiences (isn’t 100% convinced whether life is simulation or not)
  2. Metaphysics: theory of reality
    - what is the world like? What kinds of things does it contain? What is fundamental?
    - simulation hypothesis: the theory that we are (probably) in a simulation
  3. Philosophy of mind: epistemology and metaphysics of mind
    - is the mind the same as the brain? is the mind a ‘program’? does AI have mentality; what about consciousness? do we make ‘free’ choices? can the mind ‘extend’ to artificial objects?
  4. Ethics: ethics of action
    - what makes an action right or wrong? what does that? when is something responsible?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is virtual simulation?

A

a computer generated model of an event, process, system, action, behavior, or environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a virtual world?

A

A virtual simulation of a world in which the user will have the experience as of being within, and interacting with that world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are simulations for?

A
  • model what is happening
  • model what could have happened
  • model what could happen or could be
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a perfect simulation?

A

a simulation that perfectly matches the human experience as of some event or entire ‘life’, such that the user wouldn’t be able to reliably distinguish the simulated world from the non-simulated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the simulation hypothesis?

A
  1. we are and have always been in an artificially designed perfect simulation of a whole world
  2. if the simulation hypothesis is true, then what we have always been interacting with, has been constructs of the simulation, something designed by a simulator
  3. if the simulation hypothesis is true, the neither we are:
    - biosims: biological entities outside the simulation but cognitively and physiologically connected to it
    - pure sims: wholly artificial entities inside the simulation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is external world realism?

A
  1. we inhabit an ‘external world’: a physical world that is mind-independent; its existence does not depend upon being perceived or believed
  2. our experiences represent objects with minimal objectivity: they have causal powers, and they seem to persist regardless of changes in our perceptual experiences and beliefs
  3. our ordinary beliefs are not radically mistaken: many of them are true and amount to knowledge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are some simulation assumptions?

A
  1. substrate independence: human mentality can be fully simulated and artificial. It doesn’t essentially depend on our biology or environment
  2. techno-optimism: humanity won’t go extinct before ‘post-human’ advancement
  3. not very risk averse: post-humanity wouldn’t be sufficiently averse to running ancestor simulations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are cases of sim-blockers?

A
  1. impossible/difficult: perfect simulation is impossible or else too hard.
    - dualism: the mind is nonphysical. mental states have properties that aren’t reducible to physical states or processes
    - substrate dependence: can’t ‘run’ mental states like we do programs -> mental state have non-syntactical properties that are not reducible to computation or input-output functions
  2. there’s a techno-advancement filter: simulators will die off (or hit a ceiling) before such advancement
  3. there’s a moral filter: simulators will find it too morally problematic.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the types of knowledge?

A
  1. propositional/’factual’ knowledge
    - truth condition: amsterdam in in the netherlands
    - belief condition: you believe that amsterdam is in the netherlands
    - justification condition: you have ‘good reason’-evidence- to believe that amsterdam is in the netherlands
  2. knowledge by acquaintance
  3. ability knowledge or ‘know how’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the skeptical argument?

A

P1: if you know that you’re sitting in a classroom, then you know you are not a brain in a vat (BIV) hooked up to a simulation
P2: you don’t know you’re not a BIV

therefore,

C: you don’t know that you’re sitting in a classroom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly