Lecture 1 : Introduction: the continued significance of the city for criminology Flashcards
(39 cards)
1.1. Introduction: the continued significance of the city for criminology
What percentage of the world’s resources do cities consume?
80%
What percentage of the global population will live in cities by the middle of the 21st century?
70%
What happens to the critical infrastructure of cities as more people move into them?
pressure intensifies on critical infrastructure such as
food supply, utilities, housing, healthcare, education, employment, and transport, while public authorities have fewer resources to address these pressures.
What is putting tremendous strain on existing municipal infrastructure?
Urban population growth
How can the required increase in city efficiency and cost reductions be achieved?
Through Smart City solutions
What are the 4 constructs used to interpret the implications of urbanization for crime, insecurity, and justice?
The ‘rookery’,
‘zone in transition’,
‘ecology of fear’,
the ‘smart city’.
What is the dates and who and where is The ‘rookery’,
St. Giles, London, mid-19th century
Mayhew, 1860
What does the “zone in transition” refer to?
Who introduced the concept of the “zone in transition” and when?
reflecting areas undergoing rapid change due to urbanization and development, similar to what was observed in Chicago during the early 20th century.
Burgess, early 20th C.
What does the “ecology of fear” refer to and in what context?
Who is associated with the concept of the “ecology of fear” and when was it introduced?
It refers to the relationship between urban environments and the perceived and real threats of crime, particularly in Los Angeles in the late-20th century.
Davis, late 20th C.
What does the “smart city” concept refer to?
Who introduced the concept of the “smart city” and when?
It refers to modern urban areas that utilize technology to enhance city infrastructure, security, and overall quality of life.
Edwards & Calaresu, Early 21st C.
1.2. Constructions of Crime, Security and Justice in the City: ‘The Rookery’ and ‘The Zone in Transition
Who coined the term “rookery” and what did it describe?
It referred to a slum associated with the London poor in the mid-19th century
Mayhew to describe the moral turpitude and associated criminality in the slum neighborhoods of Victorian cities.
The term “rookery” referred to dens of thieves and gathering places for populations involved in criminal activities.
Describe the migration patterns associated with the first and fourth industrial revolutions.
First industrial revolution: Migration from countryside to cities for residence, work, and leisure.
Fourth industrial revolution: Migration towards greater online social relations in ‘smart’ cities.
How were slum dwellers portrayed by Mayhew?
Slum dwellers were portrayed as dangerous individuals who rejected civil society and preyed upon the respectable working class.
What characterized the slums according to Mayhew?
characterized by ‘nomads’ or rootless individuals with little investment in their communities, focused on immediate self-gratification through drugs and vice, such as intoxicating liquors and unchaste behavior.
How were the issues in the slums viewed in terms of their origin?
The issues were seen as problems stemming from the citizens themselves and the culture they brought to the city.
What impact did migration have on the city according to Mayhew?
Migrants from other areas brought alien values to the city, contributing to the decline in civil standards.
What are the key concepts related to eugenics and societal fears in urban criminology, in relation to Rookery
- Eugenics and the history of ‘respectable’ fears
- Immigration and the fear of ‘alien’ cultures
- The fear of unregulated sexualities
What was Mayhew’s key argument in relation to crime among the poor in London?
Mayhew argued that crime among the poor was due to their own agency and moral choices. He believed that degenerate populations chose to reject civil society and engage in criminal behavior.
What conditions of the working class in England did Engels (1845/1935) think were the causes of crime in the ‘great towns’?
The demoralising influences of poverty, dirt and law enforcement
What is the perennial argument about crime among the poor in London in relation to Mayhew and Engels?
Agency? - Mayhew: Crime is a result of the individual choices and moral failings of degenerate populations.
Conditions? – Engels: Crime is a result of demoralizing social conditions and inequality that pull the poor into criminal behavior.
(influenced by the environment people live in)
What was the period of ‘high modernity’ (1900-1970s) associated with in terms of urban crime?
Crime was overwhelmingly conceived as an urban problem during this period of rapid urbanization in North America and Western Europe.
What is meant by the ‘suburbanization’ of cities?
Refers to the differentiation between stable, settled, residential, and commuter zones and the inner-city ‘zone in transition’ with constant residential turnover.