lecture 10 - int environmental law Flashcards

(31 cards)

1
Q

What is climate change?

A

Industrial revolution of mankind. Greenhouse gases are an essential part of this as the temperature rises by this.

The more CO2, the higher the temperature, leading to problems such as rising sea levels.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the primary focus of treaties adopted in the 19th century?
➞ environmental

A

Shared natural resources, often bilateral, with an anthropocentric approach to protect animals for human use.

➞ antroprecentic approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the Basel Convention on waste export?

A

A treaty stating that a country must give a permit to receive waste from another country, not banning it outright.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does the Biodiversity Convention (1992) aim to protect?

A

More than just plants; it aims to protect biodiversity, which is declining due to pollution, population growth, and climate change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the UNFCCC?

A

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change established in 1992.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

List the key climate agreements.

A
  • Kyoto Protocol (1998)
  • Paris Agreement (2015)
  • UNFCCC (1992)

These agreements set the rules for international climate action.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Principles of environmental law and sustaionable development

A
  • Common but differentiated responisbilty
  • Prevention
  • Precaution
  • Polluter pays
  • Sustainable use of natural resources
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Common but differentiated responisbilty principle

A

Richer countries produce and polute more most often. So in the framework convention it was agreed that the convention would be based on this princple. So developed country which are more responsible, should also do more to prevent climate change

  • Therefore the Kyoto Protocol ➞ binding rules, but only for developed states
  • So also not for China, as they were seen as a developing state (even though now they produce a lot of pollution)
  • Paris agreement of 2015 ➞ all states got the obligation to reach for the goals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What principle emphasizes preventing pollution rather than cleaning it up after it occurs?

A

Prevention principle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does the precautionary principle state?

A

The absence of scientific certainty is not an excuse for inaction.
➞ this is in line with the precautionary approach

adopted in the Rio declaration of 1992

So if you do A, some think that B will accure but not certain yet (serious damage). What will you do? This principle says that this is not an excuse to do nothing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the ‘polluter pays’ principle?

A

The principle that those who pollute should bear the costs of managing it to prevent damage to human health or the environment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)?

A

Goals set in 2015 to be met by 2030, aiming for clearer global objectives.

But in practice there are still gaps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the concept of sustainable development?

A

= the overarching Concept of Sustainable Development point to the direction which we want to head. Economic, environmental and social

Definition in the report = development that meets the needs of the current generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is ‘common but differentiated responsibility’?

A

The principle that richer countries, which pollute more, should take greater responsibility in preventing climate change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the significance of the Kyoto Protocol?

A

It established binding rules for developed states to reduce emissions.

Article 3 Kyoto Prococol ➞ clear date, by 2012 lower emmissions by 5 procent on avarage. So this is very concrete, you know what, by when and it is measurable
- for each country a specific percentage was laid down

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does the Paris Agreement aim for?

A

To limit global temperature rise to well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.

So it is hard law, but in the treaty it has voluntary contributions ➞ so a weird mix between hard and soft law…

Pathway = net zero emissions after 2050
How? = by voluntary natoinally determined contributions

17
Q

What is the relationship between the Paris Agreement and voluntary contributions?

A

It incorporates voluntary nationally determined contributions, creating a mix of hard and soft law.

18
Q

What is climate litigation?

A

Legal actions taken to hold governments or corporations accountable for their contributions to climate change.

Other options:
- Arbitration
- Regular courts at national level - Urgenda case eg
- International courts and tribunals

19
Q

What was the outcome of the ICJ case Pulp Mill (Argentina v Uruguay)?

A

Uruguay was found to have violated the principle of prevention.
For argentina it didn’t mean that the pulp mill had to be stopped, because it was already in operation, even though there was a violation

20
Q

What was the ruling in the ICJ Whaling in the Antarctic case?

A

Japan was allowed to continue hunting whales under the guise of scientific research, despite the court’s concerns.

  • The hunting of whales is not illegal according to the court.
  • There is a treaty about whaling, but it only regulates whaling. But too many whales were being hunted, and therefore a new doc was set up which said that whale hunting wasn’t allowed. But countries could object this and then you could continue hunting
  • In this case: Japan said that they were conducting scientific studies to hunt a lot of whales a year ➞ research was allowed. Weren’t allowed to say what was scientific and what wasn’t, but what Japan was doing couldn’t be seen as scientific research (no data etc)
  • However, Japan withdrew and set up a new program which was scientific and started to hunt again
21
Q

What did the WTO DS58 Shrimp-Turtle case address?

A

The US’s requirement for TEDs (turtle exclusion devices) to protect sea turtles during shrimp fishing.

  • Here the US complained about the fact that so many sea turtles were being killed in the process of catching fish ➞ had to use TED’s (turtle exclusive devices) if countries wanted to sell shrimp to the US. But other countries said that they couldn’t do that. At first instance the WTO said that it is correct that the US can’t order HOW to protect turtles. You CAN protect them, but not in this way
  • So the US created their own legislation ➞ TED’s or other means. But the other countries were still not happy. Now the body said that it IS okay ➞ in line with international trade law because it was flexible
22
Q

What did the ITLOS advisory opinion state about climate change?

A

It declared that climate change constitutes marine pollution, and states should take action.

23
Q

What was the ruling in the ECtHR KlimaSeniorinnen v Switzerland case?

A

Switzerland was found to have an obligation to protect the health of its citizens from climate change impacts.

So the court said that by not having in place good measures, you are violating art 8

24
Q

What is still a significant gap in international climate agreements?

A

Lack of clear, binding rules and accountability for pollution.

25
Fill in the blank: The principle of _______ states that states should take precautionary measures even in the absence of scientific certainty.
precaution
26
True or False: The Paris Agreement includes legally binding emission reduction targets for all countries.
False
27
gaps in environmental
Many forms of polution are still taking place, and the polutors aren’t paying (even though that in UN conferences in Stockholm and Rio decided that they would have to pay) ## Footnote Think of plastic ➞ ends up in the water, which ends up in fish, and therfore in us Now negotiating plasic treaty ➞ but a lot of opposition of countries who produce a lot of plastic Plastic waste was also shipped to china, because that was cheaper than to deal with inside the EU. Even china now has a ban on the import of plastic cause a lot of disadvantages
28
Non binding delcarations of the Rio declarations that did pave the way ➞ later on some principles did become a binding rule **How can this principle for eg turn into a binding rule of international law?** ## Footnote In 1992, at the rio conference, they adopted both non-binding and binding norms
when it becomes customy law (opinio juris and state practice) ➞ if states have the conviction that it is binding and they act this way
29
What are the key elements of the precautionary principle?
(1) Threat of serious or irreversible harm, (2) Scientific uncertainty, (3) Cost-effective measures should still be taken.
30
How does precaution differ from prevention?
Prevention requires proven harm before acting; precaution allows action (to protect) even if harm is not yet scientifically certain.
31
Is the precautionary principle considered binding international law?
While initially soft law, it is now widely considered customary international law due to state practice and opinio juris.