Lecture 4: Exhaustible Resources Flashcards
(20 cards)
Reserves (non-renewable resources)
Quantities economically recoverable under present costs and prices
Resources Potential
Estimates of upper limits on resource extraction possibilities given current and expected technologies.
World Reserve Base
Upper bound of resource stocks that is economically recoverable under ‘reasonable’ expectations of future price and tech potential
How to frame consumption/extraction of non-renewable resources
- Optimal depletion of an endowment; Optional allocation of consumption across time-periods –> depends on time preferences and using a negative discount rate for future periods (implies consumption rate is more valuable today)
- Maximisation of discounted flows of net benefits
Intertemporal Preference Curves
To find the optimal consumption path for exhaustible resources across time periods –> These are bendy curves allocation consumption between time periods t and t+1
Intertemporal Production Possibilities (IPP)
Describing how stock in t relates to stock in t+1
The optimal consumption path for exhaustible resources across time periods
Find the tangency point between IPP and preference curves
- With positive time preference, consumer chooses smoothly decreasing amount of consumption.
Deterioration of Exhaustible Resource (at rate d) over time
[impact on optimal consumption]
- Negative income effect: wealth decreases as resource deteriorates –> lower stock –>consumption decreases in all time periods
- Substitution effect: Reducing productivity of conservation in time t because not consuming a unit in t will result in d units wasted
- Decreasing payoff from restraint
- Decreases slope of IPP
Regeneration of Exhaustible Resources (at rate g) over time
[impact on optimal consumption]
- Positive income effect: wealth increases as resource regenerates –> higher stock –>consumption increases in all time periods
- Substitution effect: Increasing productivity of conservation in time t; Increasing payoff from restraint
- Increases slope of IPP
Marginal User Cost
The opportunity cost (in terms of future consumption possibilities) of consuming another unit today.
Increasing cost because the more you use today, the higher the cost of lost future opportunity.
What is MUC influenced by
Influenced from:
1. Demand in Period 1 and 2
2. IPP
3. Discount rate –> discounted demand curve.
Marginal Extraction Curve (MEC)
Typically constant (k)
- Related to the production process of a non-renewable resource (while MUC is related to consumption)
Optimal Extraction of Non-Renewable Resources Implication
Implies price = Marginal Cost = Sum of Marginal Extraction Cost (MEC) and Marginal User Cost (MUC)
Rent in the Optimal Extraction of Non-Renewable Resources
The rent per unit of resource = Surplus value after all costs have been accounted for arising from scarcity and intertemporal consumption.
- If no rent is paid then MUC=0 (because no individual user is getting the benefits or lack of)
- Rent = price at equilbirium taking scarcity into account MINUS price at equilibrium only taking production into account.
Property Rights in Optimal Extraction of Non-Renewables
MUC = 0 if open-access because no individual user is getting benefits or lack of
- So for open access = no rent = P = MEC(t)
Recycled Resources
If we assume a perfect substitution between natural and recycled resources then there’s a 2-way link between markets and:
p(t) = MEC(t) + MUC(t) = MCC (t) + MUCS(t)
where MCC(t) = Marginal Recycling Cost
MUCS(t) = Marginal User Cost of Recycling Scrap (dependent on previously extracted resource and recycling rate)
Net Benefit Function
Is the area between the demand and supply curve which will be a trapezoid so can find the function assuming:
- Base 1 = Difference between where functions hit the y-axis (at Q=0)
- Base 2 = Difference b/w two formulas at Q –> demand function - supply function
- Height = Q at that point
So Area = 0.5H(B1+B2)
To Find PV(MNBfuture)
Divide the MNB equation by the discount rate. Then graph it opposite (on RHS axis) with MNBcurrent on LHS axis. The x-axis should be the length of the resource constraint. Where they hit is optimal allocation
To Graph PV(MNBfuture) and MNBcurrent
Graph PV(MNBfuture) opposite (on RHS axis) with MNBcurrent on LHS axis. The x-axis should be the length of the resource constraint. Where they hit is optimal allocation
Using policy, how would you impose the optimal allocation of resources between generations/two time period?
Most efficient way is adding a Piguovian tax in the current period to internalise the externality of using too much of the resource in the current period. To do this, make the tax = MNBcurrent (optimally) - MNBcurrent (at max production, probably =0). This should= the tax level
Can graph this by using the supply and demand curves and shifting the supply curve up to incorporate the tax amount.