Lecture 5 - Genetic modifications and biosafety Flashcards
(37 cards)
What are the various uses of transgenic plants?
- herbicide resistance
- resistance towards pests and pathogens
- tolerance of extreme environments
- increased yields
- modification of development
- nutritional modification of food
- growth on marginal soils
- bioremediation
- moelcular farming of proteins
- production of useful metabolites
What biosafety issues are there with the use of transgenic plants?
- transgene spread
- environmental pollution
- contamination of human food
- product safety
How might transgenes be spread into the environment?
- horizontal gene transfer to microorganisms (bacteria can pick up a gene transfer and problematic if use antibiotics that are used in making people better)
- outcrossing (transgenic pollen) gene flow into wild relatives (e.g. bad if herbicide resistance genes spread into weeds)
- colonisation of natural ecosystems by transgenic plants (percieved as a risk however if working with crop varieties it is unlikely that will become an agressive weed species
How can transgene spread by horizontal gene transfer be avoided?
- removing markers form transgenic plants
- rare and inefficient as long as the recipient has no selective advantage
- use alternatives to antibiotic resistance markers
How can transgene spread by outcrossing be prevented?
- physical containment
- removal of flowers
- harvest crops before flowering
- border rows to trap pollen
- apomixis (reproduction without fertilisation)
- physical or genetic male sterility
- excision of transgenes from pollen
- chloroplast tranformation
How can transgene spread by colonisation of natural ecosystems be prevented?
- physical containment
- harvest crops before seed setting (leafy crops only)
- suicide genes (failure of embryo development)
- control of seed dormancy or shattering
What unwanted foreign DNA is there in transformed crops that may need to be removed? What does this acheive?
- removing antibiotic resistance genes
- removing vector DNA
- removing surplus copies of the transgene (increases stability and expression - too many increases liklihood of silencing)
addresses the risk of horizontal gene transfer, respoding to public concerns
What tool is used to excise antibiotic resistance markers?
Marker free transgenic plants by autoexcision - Using site specific recombinase system
- Used construct introduced into plants to produce transgenic lines by a resistance marker flanked by sites that are recognised by site specific recombinase. e.g. cre recombinase
- Recombinase gene also in the region flanked by the recombination site under the control of a germline specific promoter
- In the second generation recombinase acts on the recombination site and excises all the internal genetic material
- Construct introduced into plants which are transformed and regenerated after selfing of the primary transformant
What is the result of generating marker free transgenic plants by autoexcision?
- observe a high frequency of excision
What is the structure of the autoexcision construct?
- construct v complicated within the region flanked by recognition sites (lox sites) recognised by the cre recombinase
- contains antibiotic resistance gene under control of monopoline synthase promoter and terminator
- intron containing recombinase gene under germline specific promoter
- counter selectible marker - makes system more efficient as can select against plants that contain the region
how can you test that marker free transgenic plants have been generated by autoexcision?
- isolate DNA of offspring
- PCR analysis (design efficient primers)
- in case the region was still present, used primers
- the absence of a band demonstrate that the plant is marker free and also the presece of a band at 724bp demonstrated that excision had occured
What are the advantages of chloroplast formation?>
- multiple transgene copies (100 chloroplast/cell x 100 copies/chloroplasts)
- integration of the transgene at the target site by HR
- no transgene silencing, high yields
- usually no chloroplasts in pollen, no outcrossing
- operon gene organisation, several genes under the control of one promoter
What are the cons to chloroplast transformation?
- cannot use agrobacterium (have to use particle bombardment)
- still difficult in many plant species
- yet to be demonstrated in monocots
- no glycoslyation of proteins
- risk of horizontal gene transfer (control elements similar to prokaryotes, extreme copy number, decaying plant material DNA can be picked up by microbes)
How can you obtain transplastomic plants?
- Introduce vector into plant tissue via particle bombardment
- Some reach chloroplasts and and as the region of interest is flanked by homologous region on plasmid DNA get integration by HR at specific sites on the plasmid chromosome
- Grow callus on selective media and test by PCR for homoplasmic calli that are homogeneous and don’t carry the untransformed genetic material (otherwise result in a dilution of effect)
- Regenerate shoots and roots of plants that have had the region of interest integrated into the plasmid chromosome
- Can be made marker free by adding a restriction site in the construct to allow the excision of the marker by HR, as long as the marker is flanked by a region homolgous to itself to permit a deletion event by HR or use site specific recombination system with lox sites and plant expressing cre recombinase or marker could be cotransformed on a different construct (although still have to identify events with successful transformation but could then segregate the antibiotics resistance marker
How can markers be removed from transgenic plants?
- Can be made marker free by adding a restriction site in the construct to allow the excision of the marker by HR, as long as the marker is flanked by a region homolgous to itself to permit a deletion event by HR
- or use site specific recombination system with lox sites and plant expressing cre recombinase
- or marker could be cotransformed on a different construct, still have to identify events with successful transformation but could then segregate the antibiotics resistance marker to remove
How was chloroplast transformation demonstrated in tomato plants?
Ruf et al 2001
- Used particle bombarment on tomato leaf explants
- Callus grown
- any resistant tissue would continue gorwing on selective media and plants were regenerated from growing callus
- Before regeneration plants checked using PCR analysis, for a homoplasmid situation, want band that demonstrates a successful integration
- Tested protein levels in leaves and used a second selectable marker for indication of successful integration
- resulted in extreme levels of protein synthesis
- useful if want to produce lots of pharmaceutical compounds
Give an example of chloroplast transformation with the Bt toxin
- overexpressed Bt toxin gene with the help of additional proteins encoded naturally in bacteria where CRY genes were identified. Additional genes act as chaperones in protein folding - useful to take the whole operon (Bt cry2Aa2 operon) and express this in order to acheive a high level of protein formation
- Showed that when added whole operon as opposed to just the CRY gene alone produced far more protein. production levels were so extreme that it lead to a formation of insecticidal crystals
What was acheived through the use of plastid transformation for metabolite engineering”?
- Used plastid transformation for metabolite engineering of various compounds.
- Achieved high levels of molecules that are used as scavengers of ROS (tocopherol’s act against ROS)
- Compared WT plants with transformed plants under stress conditions they functioned better. Wt exhibited bleaching.
How can seed germination be prevented in transgenic plants?
GURT (genetic use restriction technology)
- Need three constructs. Introduce toxic gene under the control of an embryo active promoter. This is not active whilst there is a blockr active between the promoter and coding region. Blocker needs to be excised and is flanked by restriction sites. (Embryo active promoter)
- Second contruct is a repressible promoter that drives the expression of a recombinase which acts on the recombination sites, but is inactive when the repressor is bound. (Repressible pormoter)
- Repressor is produced by the third construct containing an active promoter in front of the repressor coding sequence. (Plant active promoter)
All of these together in the plant means there is no activity.
- Before sale the seeds are treated with an inducer that removes the repressor (binding to the repressor initiating a conformational change that reduces its affinity to the promoter). The recombinase is not active and the blocker is excised.
- When the plants set flowers the seeds become sterile
What are the advantages and disadvantages of GURT?
No germination of trangenic or hybrid seed
Pro: Useful for companies to develop seed stock that could not be propagated by farmers
Cons: Common practice in poorer countries that farmers reuse seeds but these do not germinate
What compounds are of interest to biosafety considerations?
- In plants: toxins, secondary metabolites
- On plants: field chemicals (herbicides, pesticides)
- Allergens
What are the percieved risks of GM crops?
- Foreign genes may have unpredictable effects
- Theoretically this could have unpredictable effects*
- Enhanced fitness -> super weeds
- Unlikely as cultivars are not fit enough to compete with wild plants*
- Toxic compounds might be produced
- toxic xompounds cannot come out of nowhere, and products will be extensively tested*
- It is not natural
- Invalid*
Give some examples of some “unnatural crops”
Golden rice
- could not have been acheived naturally
- Developed to have high beta-carotene levels as rice is not high in vitamins, lacks of vitamin in many poorer countries which rely on rice
- Ignoring that we can prevent vitamin deficiencys by not using the tools that are available
Multivitamin maize
- cannot be acheived other than introducing specific genes that encodes biosynthetic pathway allowing a synthesis of the vitamins
- 170 fold more carotene
- 6 fold ascorbate
- 2 fold folate
How have advances in molecular techniques helped to support conventional breeding?
- Improved yield, stress tolerance can be achieved by plant breeding and can be assisted by molecular plant breeding techniques
- very successful to introgress traits from wild relatives into plants - can make use of already present gene pool - otherwise tedious process can be made better by genotyping chromosomes
- if introgress trait after many rounds of backcrossing just have the locus of the chromosome from the wild relative and rest of the genome is cleaned up
- molecular tools can help by identifying these individuals by genotyping, early on to speed up
- accepted by the public
- no enhanced risk beyond the normal