Lecture 5 - Information Processing and Social Context Flashcards

(30 cards)

1
Q

Traits of Stage Theory

A

Qualitative differences between stages
Can only move forward, can’t skip
Must pass certain thresholds to progress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why did Piaget’s stage theory fail?

A

There was a lack of thought processes to apply to the principles (only one attribute explored at a time)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Criticisms of Piaget

A

Superficial changes in design can affect results
Success at younger ages challenges his theory
The experiments may not measure the target cognitive ability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Information Processing Approach

A

Children fail these tasks because of other cognitive memory limitations (memory, problem-solving, attention, metacognition).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Limitations that can effect children’s problem solving

A

Encoding (don’t encode appropriate info), computational (don’t have LTM strategies), retrieval (retrieve inappropriate strategy), storage, work-space (working memory restrictions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Piaget and Inhelder (1951) - Mountains task

A

The child is given a demonstration of 3 mountains and asked to describe the doll’s point of view. Four year olds always described what they could see whereas 7-8 year olds understood the task.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Brainerd (1983)

A

The reason younger children were less successful in the mountains task was due to information processing limitations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Vurpillot (1968)

A

Spot the difference task - 3-5 year olds only examined some and 6-9 year olds looked at all the windows for a difference.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Miller and Seier (1994)

A

3-4 year olds opened all the boxes to spot the difference while 9-10 year olds focused on appropriate boxes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Roebers et al (2010) - Experiment

A

Comparing 7-8 year olds with 9-10 year olds on eye tracking test
• Baseline and critical trials
• Recognition test: asked whether they’d seen an image before
• Distractibility test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Roebers et al (2010) - Results

A

Similar pattern in both age goups
• Looked more overall at task relevant stimuli

Younger children more affected by distractors

Evidence for continuous development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Encoding strategies

A

Rehearsal, organisation, elaboration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Rehearsal

A

Mental repetition of information (older children apply strategy more effectively)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Organisation

A

Grouping information together (10 years and older organise more effectively)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Elaboration

A

Making associations. Example: 2 words to remember, combine into image or sentence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Kreutzer et al (1975)

A

All 10 year olds were able to come up with an effective retrieval strategy to help the boy remember the puppy. Only 1/2 of 5 year olds could do the same.

17
Q

Kobasigawa (1974)

A

Participants learnt 24 images. Shown 8 cue cards with categories. Older children used cue cards as aid while younger children used them less systematically.

18
Q

Metacognition (Flavell et al, 1970)

A

More aware of memory capacity with age – younger children unrealistic about number of items can recall.

19
Q

Usefulness of memory strategies (Ringel and Springer, 1980)

A

More aware of usefulness of memory strategies – older children able to come up with more and better memory aids than younger

20
Q

Constructive memory

A

Children can infer using: scripts (sequence of actions appropriate for a specific context) and schema (what is known about a scene, place and object

21
Q

Scripts and schemas experiments

A
  • Nelson and Gruendel (1981) – restaurant script

* Blades and Banham (1990) – kitchen schema

22
Q

Chi (1978) - Children vs adults

A

Children better at remembering chess positions than adults.
Adults are better at remembering digits
Experience plays a role as experienced chess players are better than the children.

23
Q

Vygotsky (1934)

A

Cognitive processes are built by the adults helping the child learn. Culture and language are important.

24
Q

Zone of Proximal Development

A
  • Difference between actual performance and potential performance
  • How the child learns with help of others and at a level beyond existing skill (but not too far)
25
Language and Thought
• Through language that the child develops as learner and thinker • Importance of the external monologue Transition from language as tool for communication to a tool for thought Help organise and plan behaviour Internalised to become inner speech – 7 years • Contrast to Piaget – saw monologue as evidence of egocentrism
26
Bruner and Scaffolding (how knowledge is passed from expert to child)
* Recruitment: engage interest of child * Reduction of degrees of freedom: reduce number of acts required, simplify * Direction maintenance: keep motivation up * Marking critical features: highlight relevant features * Demonstration: modelling solutions
27
Animals and cultures
Many animals socially learn and some exhibit cultures and traditions - so cultures are not as complex and there's no evidence for cumulative culture
28
Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis (Hermann et al, 2007)
Humans have evolved social-cognitive skills (example is theory of mind, social learning, communication, cooperation, imitation, teaching)
29
Csibra and Gergely (2009)
Children are primed to attend to demonstrator's cues while learning.
30
Lyons et al (2011)
Children copy both relevant and irrelevant features while copying