Lecture 6 Flashcards
(42 cards)
What is the 5’ cap important for?
- Translation initiation
- Also, processing, transport and stability
What is the structure of an mRNA?
- 5’ cap and UTR: 3-1000 nt (average 50-70 in eukaryotes), often structured so must be unwound to allow passage of ribosomes, length and secondary structure influence translation efficiency
- Start codon, open reading frame (protein), stop codon
- 3’UTR and poly A tail: regulate translation initiation, efficiency and mRNA stability, tail (stability and translation(
What is the process of 5’ dependent initiation?
- 40S subunit binds to eIF2 and tRNA with initiation met (ternary complex)
- 43S pre initiation complex binds to eIF4G and then eIF4E which is cap binding protein so it is recruited to 5’ end and the eIF4A is a helices that unwinds RNA for the ribosome to find AUG
What is needed for translation efficiency?
- Proximity of 3’ end and 5’ end which is accomplished by a PAbp that binds to eIF4G which binds to eIF4E which binds cap
- when there is no cap, 3’ CITE (cap independent translation elements/enhancer recruit machinery and through kissing loops they can place machinery near 5’ end
- Ex: pea nation mosaic virus, barley yellow fever dwarf virus
How does 60S subunit join?
- When AUG start codon is found, 60S gets recruited to translate
True or false, 5’ cap is only present on mRNA and not pre-mRNA.
False, capping is cotrascriptional, so also present on pre-mRNA.
What is ribosome shunting?
The direct translocation of the 40S subunit across hairpin structures and other loops thanks to a viral structure or protein on its RNA in order to decrease the dependency to eIF4F complex that is usually needed to unwind mRNA.
Example: adenovirus late mRNAs
What is the mechanism of internal initiation?
Example of poliovirus: has VPg but also the 5’ UTR is long and structured. It has internal ribosomal entry sites (IRES) which is a structured RNA that directly recruits ribosomes and translation initiation factors. SO they found that with cap dependent ORFs, if there was no cap, there is little to no translation, but add an IRES and you get much more translation. To prove it was truly the IRES, they made circular genome, one had IRES, one did not, the one with IRES had translation, so it was clearly the IRES that recruited the ribosomes as no possibility for 5’ cap dependent translation if circle.
What predicts IRES element structure?
It is hard to do so from just the primary sequence as its ability strongly depends on the secondary structure. There is also not a lot of conservation in how these different IRES elements fold.
Requirements for IRES?
- 5’ end dependent initiation: all eIFs
- type 1 or 2 IRES: all eIFs except eIF4E since no cap duh
- Hep C IRES: eIF2 and eIF3
How does methionine-independent initiation look like?
- Cricket paralysis virus
- Can assemble 80S ribosomes without any eIFs nor Met-tRNAi
- the RNA mimics tRNAi
- Turnip yellow mosaic virus has valine like molecule
- Our prediction algorithms look for start codons, no start codons means we probably miss some ORFs
How do polyproteins maximize coding capacity?
- Picornavirus (viral proteases) and Flaviviruses (viral and host proteases)
- 1 mRNA that codes for multiple proteins (really just one long protein that gets cleaved by proteases)
Explain leaky scanning and how it maximizes coding capacity?
- Multiple possible start sites but where it starts more or less often depends on context (tRNA availability, RNA structure, RNA sequence, rare tRNA)
- Ex: Paramyxoviruses can has 5 possible start sites in different contexts for capsid proteins, there is also ribosome shunting
How does re-initiation help maximize coding capacity?
Viral structure or protein keeps the ribosome associated to the mRNA so it can reinitiate translation somewhere downstream ORF. Herpesviruses and paramyxoviruses.
How does suppression of termination (read through) maximize coding capacity?
The stop codon recruits an amino acid (like selenocysteine), so it reads through, makes new protein. Ex: retroviruses and alpha viruses
How does ribosomal frame shifting maximize coding capacity?
Ribosome suns into a slippery sequence or structure that makes it bounce back and switch reading frames. Ex: retroviruses
How does regulation of translation happen?
Rate limiting step is the recycling of the ternary complex (GTP, eIF2, iMet) so most regulation happens here. If there are stressors like ER stress (PERK) or AA deprivation (GCN2) or dsRNA (PKR) also intermediates or infection, eIF2 alpha kinases => phosphorylated eIF2 cannot be recycled and translation is shut off
PKR and the cellular antiviral response?
- PKR is present in an inactive form in the cell
- PKR is induced and activated by virus infection (sensing of dsRNA)
- Dimerizes and autophosphorylates
- Leads to inhibition of translation and apoptosis
- Interferon pathway activated
- Different viral mechanisms have evolved to inactivate the PKR pathway
How do viruses prevent activation of PKR?
Ex: Adenovirus
makes VA RNA I sequesters PKR, no phosphorylation of eIF2 alpha subunit, active protein synthesis
Viral inhibition of host cell translation
- Cell does not have opportunity to establish an antiviral response
- Poliovirus completely turns off host translation of any proteins that are cap dependent
- SDS PAGE at first all protein made, then as time goes by less and less proteins. By hour 5, only viral proteins are made. By hour 7 all cells are dead cuz no essential proteins made
- Polio graph goes down (bye bye host translation) goes up (hello virus translation) goes down again cuz cells dead
How does polio inhibit host cell translation?
- cutting eIF4G, has proteases to cleave off the viral proteins also cleave eIF4G, cutting link between eIF4G and eIF4E (cap binding protein) so now no more host proteins but viral proteins can be made because don’t need cap, they have IRES (polio and foot and mouth disease)
Poliovirus and encephalomyocarditis virus dephosphorylate 4E-bp1 which can then sequester the cap binding protein
Adenovirus and influenzavirus dephosphorylate eIF4E, does not bind to eIF4G anymore, no more cap binding protein
summary of translation
- Although viruses use the host protein synthesis machinery, they often employ novel strategies to recruit and initiate protein synthesis
- Viruses employ a number of novel mechanisms to maximize coding capacity
- Viruses can regulate protein synthesis (and even inhibit cellular protein synthesis)
What are the common set of assembly reactions and some supplementary steps?
- Formation of individual structural units of the protein shell from one or several viral proteins
- Assembly of the protein shell by appropriate, and sometimes variable, interactions among structural units
- Selective packaging of the nucleic acid genome and other essential virion components
- Acquisiton of an envelope (suppp)
- Release from the host cell
- Maturation of virus particles (suppp)
Assembly is dependent on host cell machinery like…?
- Cellular chaperones (fold well)
- Transport systems (move within cells)
- Secretory pathways -> virion secretion in some cases
- Nuclear import and export machinery