Lecture 6: Entry Modes & FDI Motives Flashcards
(29 cards)
The choice of entry modes depends on three different types of factors
Firm-specific
Industry-specific
Country-specific
Modes of entry can be classified into
Equity and non-equity based
Equity-based can be split into
Wholly owned subsidiaries and equity joint ventures
Non-equity based can be split into
Contractual agreements and export
Two types of export
Indirect (company A > Company B > Company C)
Direct (company A > Company C)
Types of contractual agreements
Licensing
franchising
r&d contracts
alliances
licensing
an arrangement where a licensor grants the rights to intangible property to another entity for a specified time period, and in turn receives royalty fee.
3x + and 2x - of licensing
+ few development costs and risks
+ capitalise on market opportunities and non-core capabilities
+ avoid tariffs and transportation costs
- high potential for loss of know-how (licensor might be a future competitor)
- potential conflicts with the licensee
franchising
a special form of licencing in which the franchisor not only sells intangible property to the franchisee, but also insists that franchisee agrees to abide by struct rules as to how it does business
1x + and 2x - franchising
+ more control than licensing
- more management needed than licensing
- Bad reputation in a franchising location could influence the whole brand image
r&d contracts
non-equity agreements between two or more companies from different countries to collaborate on a specific R&D project
alliances
agreements between two or more companies from different countries to collaborate in various business aspects
positive of alliances
shared investment and risks, reduce costs, exploitation of complementary skills and assets, establishing technological standards
negative of alliances
skills transfers, knowledge spillovers, opportunistic behaviours
joint venture
the establishment of a firm that is jointly owned by >2 independent firms.
positive of joint-venture
benefit from a local partner’s knowledge, costs and risks are shared with a partner, synergies between partners, avoiding the expropriation
negative of joint-venture
the firm risks giving control of its technology to the partner, conflict between partners due to cultural differences, shared ownership
Wholly owned subsidiary
The parent company will hold all of the subsidiary’s common stock
Positive of WOS
Reduce the risk of losing control over core competencies, allow for the tight control over operations in different countries, replication or redeployment of firm’s business models and resources, no integration costs with local partners
negative of WOS
firms bear the full costs and risks of setting up overseas operations, legitimacy problems, no bridge with host country
Greenfield
a parent company builds its operations in a foreign country from the ground up
positive greenfield
high level of control, creation of jobs
negative greenfield
high risk investment, high market entry costs, high fixed costs
Acquisition
purchasing an already existing business in the foreign country