Lecture 7-10: Key Learnings Flashcards
(65 cards)
Q1: Differentiate between weak and strong sustainability.
Weak Sustainability believes that natural capital (like forests and biodiversity) can be replaced by human capital (like infrastructure or knowledge). As long as total capital (natural + human) does not decrease, the system is considered sustainable, even if the environment is harmed.
Strong Sustainability argues that natural capital is irreplaceable and must be preserved because it’s the foundation for all other forms of capital. Without it, a truly sustainable system is not possible. It prioritises environmental protection and limits resource use to what nature can regenerate or absorb.
Ref.: Lecture 7
Define natural capital.
Biosphere, biodiversity, natural resources etc.
Define human capital.
Human ability to create:
- Social: capital for wellbeing.
- Economic: capital like infrastructure.
Give an example of weak sustainability.
Nauru mined phosphate and prioritised short-term economic gains over the preservation of essential natural capital (resources), under the false assumption that human capital can fully substitute for natural capital.
They failed to preserve natural capital (resources): The phosphate deposits were exhausted by around 1990, and 80% of the island was environmentally devastated.
Give an example of strong sustainability.
Sustainable forest management maintains forests’ natural functions and biodiversity, showing strong sustainability by preserving natural capital for future generations.
Q2: What is the Triple Bottom Line?
The TBL framework evaluates performance on three dimensions:
- People (social)
- Planet (environmental/ecological)
- Profit (economic)
It aims to guide businesses toward holistic sustainability, beyond profit maximisation.
Ref.: Lecture 7
How can the TBL framework be used in practice?
Expecting organisations to balance social, environmental, and economic goals in decision-making.
1. People:
- Ensure fair labour practices in the supply chain.
- Monitor employee satisfaction and diversity.
- Support community initiatives, health, education, and well-being.
2. Planet:
- Measure and reduce carbon footprint, waste, and emissions.
- Use renewable energy and sustainable materials.
- Design products for reuse, recycling, or circularity.
3. Profit:
- Ensure long-term profitability through sustainable innovation.
- Invest in efficiency improvements that save costs and reduce impact.
- Develop green products and services for new market opportunities.
Give an example of TBL.
Unilever claims to:
People (Social):
- Improve global health and hygiene (e.g., handwashing, nutrition).
- Promote gender equality and fair wages.
- Support smallholder farmers with training and fair trade.
Planet (Environmental):
- Target net-zero emissions by 2039.
- Source raw materials sustainably (e.g., palm oil, tea).
- Reduce plastic use and improve recyclability of packaging.
Profit (Economic):
- Sustainable brands (e.g., Dove, Hellmann’s) grow faster than others.
- Build consumer trust through ethical practices.
- Save costs via energy and material efficiency.
What are the main criticisms of the TBL framework?
- Measurement challenges: Indicators for social, environmental, and economic aspects are hard to quantify and compare.
- Business logic challenge: Companies often focus on the economic dimension and treat TBL as a compliance tool, not a strategy for true sustainability.
How does the SSCM model align with the Triple Bottom Line concept of sustainability?
The Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM) model aligns with the Triple Bottom Line by integrating environmental, social, and economic performance into supply chain strategy.
Three circles:
- Environmental Performance:
- Social Performance
- Economic Performance
The intersection of all three circles defines true sustainability:
- Strategy as a core, integrated objective.
- Organisational culture with values and ethics.
- Transparency via open stakeholder communication and responsible operations.
- Risk management through e.g. contingency planning.
This holistic approach ensures that supply chains are resilient, responsible, and future-oriented.
What does the Sustainability Challenge diagram illustrate?
It shows that true sustainability lies at the intersection of Economy, Ecology, and Society.
Key concepts include:
- Eco-Efficiency (Economy + Ecology)
- Socio-Efficiency (Economy + Society)
- Eco-Justice (Ecology + Society)
Balancing all three dimensions is essential for achieving long-term sustainability.
Q3: How does the Jevons Paradox influence the impact of product groups?
In short: Increased efficiency in resource use can paradoxically lead to higher overall consumption due to higher demand from lower costs, thus negating environmental benefits.
In economics, the Jevons paradox occurs when technological progress or government policy increases the efficiency with which a resource is used (reducing the amount necessary for any one use), but the falling cost of use increases its demand, negating reductions in resource use.
Ref.: Lecture 9
Explain the rebound effect.
To do less harm is not good, since the positive effects may be negated by the rising number of customers and products.
Q4: How can companies implement sustainability in their supply chains? Please refer to the models we have discussed in class.
To implement sustainability, companies must:
- Integrate TBL thinking into strategic goals and supply chain KPIs for holistic sustainability.
- Choose a strategy of SSCM (Seuring & Müller, 2008) based on their maturity and industry: Supplier management to enforce sustainability and avoid risks (audits and certifications), or product management to design and deliver sustainable products (LCA, eco-design etc.)
- Adopt circular strategies of CSCM (Batista et al., 2018), like reverse logistics and the 10Rs (Circularise, 2023), to move beyond linear “take-make-dispose” to integrated closed- and open-loop systems.
- Collaborate across the supply chain, invest in transparency, and use LCA/MFA tools for decision-making - LCA helps firms evaluate product impacts across all life stages, and MFA tracks physical flows (inputs and outputs) in supply chains.
- Draw from circular economy schools of thought to guide systemic transformation, including:
- Cradle to Cradle: Design for endless cycles, such that all materials either return safely to nature (biological cycle) or can be reused in industrial processes (technical cycle) -> Butterfly Diagram as visualisation (e.g. a biodegradable shoe sole that enriches soil when composted).
- Industrial Ecology: Treat supply chains like ecosystems - waste from one process becomes input for another (e.g. Kalundborg Symbiosis, where companies share by-products, water, and energy).
- Performance Economy: Sell product functions (services), not ownership (e.g. Philips Pay-per-Lux model, where light bulbs are offered as a service).
- Blue Economy, Biomimicry, Natural Capitalism: Innovation through nature and resource optimisation (e.g. Using coffee grounds to grow mushrooms, and composting the leftovers as fertiliser).
Ref.: All lectures.
Q5: What are the key differences between ‘normal’ and ‘sustainable’ supply chains?
Focus:
- Normal: Cost, speed, and efficiency.
- Sustainable: Integrate economic, environmental, and social goals (Triple Bottom Line).
Time:
- Normal: Prioritise short-term profitability.
- Sustainable: Aim for long-term value creation, including societal and ecological well-being.
Suppliers:
- Normal: Limited visibility beyond first-tier suppliers.
- Sustainable: Extend responsibility across multi-tier suppliers.
Approach:
- Normal: Often reactive to regulations or risks.
- Sustainable: Take a proactive and strategic approach to sustainability.
Mindset:
- Normal: Product-centric.
- Sustainable: Include life-cycle thinking and stakeholder engagement.
Ref.: All lectures.
Describe the transition of supply chain management over the decades (from internal to sustainable).
No strategy:
- Stage 1: Internal focus - Silo effect.
- Stage 2: Focus on internal flow of material - integration and linkage of internal functions.
- Stage 3: First external link with suppliers - Internal JiT strategy.
Active supply chain management strategy:
-
Stage 4: Supply chain management integration of
external suppliers. - Stage 5: Lean supply chain management - Full JiT, TQM etc., broadening the scope of control beyond the 1st tier.
Active (S)SCM and CE strategy:
- **Stage 6: Sustainability in the supply chain, circularity and beyond.
Define Just in Time (JIT). What is the ecological impact of JIT? Is it good or bad?
To deliver small quantities of material, at right time, delivered to the right location, in the right quantities and the right quality.
- Good: Reduces waste like scrap, raw materials in production, energy/emissions, and saves money.
- Bad: Causes more truck, ship, and plane traffic, increases empty loads, and increases air and noise emissions, which generally pollute more and stress the environment.
What is waste? Define the seven types of waste.
Firms reduce costs and add value by eliminating waste from the productive system and raising efficiency.
- Waste from overproduction
- Waste of waiting time
- Transportation waste
- Inventory waste
- Processing waste
- Waste of motion
- Waste from product defects
Define sustainable supply chain management.
The coordinated management of material, information, and capital flows across companies, while integrating the economic, environmental, and social goals of sustainable development.
What are the main goals of sustainable supply chain management?
- Input/throughput: Minimising resources needed and minimising/mitigating/avoiding harmful practices.
- Output: Products which are produced respecting social and environmental standards in addition to bringing a profit.
Explain the general model for sustainable supply chain management.
The focal company is in the center, influences by and interacts with multiple external and internal factors:
- Norm strategies: Strategic responses to set the baseline, like avoiding risks from global supply chains (addressing non-compliance issues), and SCM for sustainable products (integrating sustainability into product design, sourcing and logistics).
- Suppliers (multi-tiers): The focal company collaborates with multiple levels of suppliers. The connection is shaped by barriers and supporting factors like regulations, cost or capabilities.
- Pressures and incentives: The focal company responds to influences from governance (regulations and policies), customers (demand for sustainable products), and stakeholders (investors etc.)
Define pressure and incentives in terms of SSCM.
- Pressure and incentives groups: Customers, governments, NGOs, competitors, other stakeholders etc.
- Possible pressures: Boycott, higher cost of loans, fines, legal requirements and negative media coverage/ negative reputation.
*Possible incentives: Higher prices and profits, customer loyalty, good media coverage/ reputation, favourable business environment (e.g. taxes) and First Mover advantages.
What are companies required to do under Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence and conflict minerals regulations?
Companies must identify and address actual or potential human rights and environmental risks in their operations and supply chains (due diligence).
Under the U.S. Dodd-Frank Act (Section 1502), they must also disclose whether they source conflict minerals (e.g., tin, tungsten, tantalum, gold) from conflict zones like Congo, with third-party audits required.
However, challenges include lack of affordable traceability mechanisms and unintended consequences like reduced legal exports.
Explain the soft entry strategy model.
A gradual and collaborative approach to integrating sustainability into supply chains, especially when dealing with multi-tier suppliers.
There are two paths from the focal company to suppliers (multi-tier) and vice versa:
- From focal company to suppliers: Supplier evaluation based on a set of criteria.
- From suppliers to focal company: Supplier self-evaluation, standards and minimum requirements.