Lecture 8: Psychology of Brands Flashcards

1
Q

Why are symbols (including logos) powerful?

A
  • Symbols (including logos) are powerful because:
    o They can be used to represent an infinite number of concepts
    o We perceive them quickly and effortlessly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How can a logo be a “double-edged sword”?

A

o A strong logo can mean that people don’t want it to change
♣ People become very attached to the logo over time (like it and used to it)
♣ E.g. USyd changed its logo in 2010
• Huge protests to the change
• Controversial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How can logos be highly important in cultivating brand awareness?

A

o Activate associations with a particular brand (e.g. an apple logo = the brand ‘Apple’)
o Imbue concepts into the logo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the effectiveness of using colour dependent on?

A
  • Effectiveness of using colour depends on context
    o E.g. Basic colours in cluttered vs. uncluttered environments
    ♣ Colour stands out more in clutter (doesn’t stand out in uncluttered environments)
    o E.g. When the iPod came out, Apple used white cords to complete with all the MP3 players on the market as they all used black cords (made the Apple cord stand out)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the two important aspects of names in branding?

A
  • Sound symbolism

- Fluency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is sound symbolism?

A

o Marketers try to align sounds to their brand/product (e.g. hard vs. soft sounding names)
o Spoken words conjure up images even if the words themselves have no meaning
o Demonstration by Wolfgang Köhler: maluma and takete
♣ Even when talking about nonsensical names (‘maluma’ and ‘takete’), we know which shape that name reflects
• ‘Maluma’ (curvy, smooth shape) and ‘takete’ (hard, pointy, sharp shape)
• Able to match rounded words to rounded shapes and hard words to hard shapes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is fluency?

A

o The extent to which a name is easy to pronounce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the 3 properties of fluent words/names?

A

♣ Short names
♣ Share sounds and letters that are usually a combination in the English language
♣ Have simple letter strings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How can word/name fluency confer advantages?

A
  • We evaluate things with fluent names more positively
    o Things that are not mentally taxing (like an unpronounceable name) are more pleasing to us
    o Fluency is like a halo effect – we seem to use fluency as a heuristic to make judgements about stimuli
    ♣ Tend to believe that fluent stimuli are more familiar, more likeable, more famous, more intelligent and more true than similar but less-fluent stimuli
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The Alter and Oppenheimer (2006), study looking at whether people could predict stock performance using fluency, found what?

A

o Study 1 (fabricated/fake stock names): Participants expected stocks with fluent names to outperform stocks with disfluent names
o Study 2 (real shares on the NYSE and AMEX): Fluent stocks outperformed disfluent stocks, but only in the short term
♣ Other factors may play a role (e.g. economics) in the long-term
♣ Effect found to not be due to company size (more resources) or industry
o Study 3: Replicated Study 2 (actual stock performance) results using ticker codes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did the Alter and Oppenheimer (2006) look into?

A

o Studied whether people could predict stock performance using fluency
♣ Familiarity – people don’t want to take unnecessary risks (able to take away inherent risk (using fluency) more likely to invest in fluent stocks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why are logos, colours and names important in branding?

A
  • They provide marketers with multiple routes to increasing brand awareness
    o Exposure effect – Repeated exposure to something can increase people’s liking of it over time
    o Social proof
  • When used effectively, they give brands public visibility
    o Provides social proof
    ♣ Seeing other people using and consuming a particular brand (logo seen everywhere), then that provides social proof that it is good (social validation)
  • When used effectively (good logo, people using it), the brand advertises itself (e.g. Apple)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

James (1890) highlighted the link between consumption and the self-concept. What did he say?

A

o A person is the sum total of the things he/she possesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What components of brands give them symbolic meanings?

A

o Values/purpose
o Personality
o E.g. Evidence shows that owners can be matched to the cars they own

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The symbolic quality of brands means that we can use them to do what (in relation to the Self)?

A
  1. Reflect the self (e.g. “I buy a Prius because I see myself as caring about the environment)
  2. Signal the self (e.g. “I buy a Prius to show others that I care about the environment)
  3. Define the self (e.g. “I care about the environment because I bought a Prius”)
    o These different kinds of Self functions can be satisfied by brands
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

From age 12, what do children understand that brands can do?

A
  • From age 12, children understand that brands can signal something about the self
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How do 8-year-olds treat brands?

A

o 8 year-olds treat brands as informational and perceptual cues
♣ Behaviour towards brand is based on how they feel about the brand/product

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What about a brand’s personality can make people like them?

A
  • People like brands whose personality is congruent with their own (Aaker, 1999)
    o Self-definition
19
Q

What about products or brands can make people avoid them?

A
  • People avoid products or brands that represent undesired identities or groups
20
Q

What are two examples of studies that showed people avoiding products/brands that represented undesired identities or groups?

A

o E.g. Men avoided steak listed as “ladies cut” but not when it was labelled “chef’s cut” (White & Dahl, 2006)
♣ The men avoided things associated with women
o E.g. Canadians negatively evaluated products that symbolically represent Americans, but not Belgians (White & Dahl, 2006)
♣ Possible that it reflects the competition between the US and Canada

21
Q

What is ‘brand personality’?

A

The set of anthropomorphised human characteristics associated with a brand

22
Q

Brand personality has relatively stable effects on consumers over time but is influenced by what?

A
  • Relatively stable effects on consumers over time but influenced by context
23
Q

What does brand personality create BETWEEN brands?

A
  • Creates differentiation between brands, even when there are few objective differences
    o Brand personality can be a predictor of what kinds of people will be attracted to certain brands
24
Q

What 3 sources does the personality of a brand come from?

A

o Marketer (trying to market the brand)
o The users themselves
o The personality of a brand is then subsequently reinforced by the environment

25
Q

What can marketers do when creating or changing the personality of a brand and why?

A

♣ Can use anthropomorphised characteristics to market the brand
• E.g. Louie the Fly
♣ Marketers will often try to change the brand’s personality for a variety of reasons
• Attempt to make it more marketable to certain demographics

26
Q

What can users themselves do to the personality of a brand?

A

♣ Personality of the people using the brand can go back into the personality of the brand itself

27
Q

What is the 5-Factor Structure of Brand Personality (Aaker, 1997)?

A

5 brand personality factors that correspond to the Big-5 personality factors

  1. Sincerity
  2. Excitement
  3. Competence
  4. Sophistication
  5. Ruggedness
28
Q

What are the components of the “Sincerity” factor in the 5-Factor Structure of Brand Personality (Aaker, 1997)?

A
Sincerity 
o	Down-to-earth
o	Honest
o	Wholesome
o	Cheerful
29
Q

What are the components of the “Excitement” factor in the 5-Factor Structure of Brand Personality (Aaker, 1997)?

A
Excitement 
o	Daring
o	Spirited
o	Imaginative
o	Up-to-date
30
Q

What are the components of the “Competence” factor in the 5-Factor Structure of Brand Personality (Aaker, 1997)?

A

Competence
o Reliable
o Intelligent
o Successful

31
Q

What are the components of the “Sophistication” factor in the 5-Factor Structure of Brand Personality (Aaker, 1997)?

A

Sophistication
o Upper class
o Charming

32
Q

What are the components of the “Ruggedness” factor in the 5-Factor Structure of Brand Personality (Aaker, 1997)?

A

Ruggedness
o Outdoorsy
o Tough

33
Q

Which 2 factors of the 5-Factor Structure of Brand Personality do not map onto any human personality characteristics?

A

“Sophistication” and “Ruggedness”

34
Q

In the 5-Factor Structure of Brand Personality, factor structure differs based on what?

A
  • Factor structure differs based on countries and their associated cultures
35
Q

What are the 3 Levels of the Self (Brewer & Gardner, 1996)?

A

o Individual: Self as distinct from others
o Relational: Self in relation to close others
o Collective: Self in relation to group memberships

36
Q

What are the 3 Domains of the Self (Higgins, 1987)?

A

o Actual self: The way we are
o Ought self: The way we think we should be
o Ideal self: The way we aspire to be

37
Q

How are the different facets of the Self associated with brands?

A
  • Brands can influence, and are influenced by, these different facets of the Self
38
Q

What are “Self-brand connections”?

A
  • The extent to which a consumer has incorporated a brand into their self-concept
39
Q

What should a person’s Self-brand connections indicate ?

A

o Should indicate consumption choices

40
Q

How are Self-brand connections tested?

A

o Tested using explicit and implicit measures
♣ Explicit measures: Participants state reasons for brand connection
♣ Implicit measures: Reaction time measure to assess strength of association

41
Q

How are brands related to the fundamental human need to belong?

A
  • We use brands as a way to achieve membership in a group

o Brand communities (e.g. Harley Davidson, Nike)

42
Q

How are brands related to the fundamental human need to be unique (even when belonging)?

A
  • We use brands to differentiate ourselves from other people

o People with a higher need for uniqueness prefer products that are more distinct

43
Q

How can brands satisfy both the need to belong and the need to be unique?

A
  • We can use different choice dimensions to satisfy both needs
  • Participants can be assimilated into their in-group on one dimension but differentiated from their in-group on another dimension (Chan et al., 2011)
44
Q

How are brands related to the need for effectance?

A
  • The “IKEA Effect” (Norton et al., 2012)
    o We overvalue self-made products greater attachment to a product we helped make
    o Illustrates the importance of consumer involvement (product becomes a co-creation)