Lecture 9 - Capital Structure Decision II Flashcards
In most countries interest payments on debt are…
Tax deductible.
Tax shield from debt is…
Valuable assets.
Some of the increase in equity risk and return is offset by the…
Tax shield from interest payment.
What are the implications of corporate taxes, according to MM theory?
- All firms should borrow as much as possible.
- This maximises firm value and minimises the WACC.
In practice, however, no one would expect the gains to apply at extreme debt ratios. Why?
- Other factors, such as personal taxes, personal income from personal debt and equity.
- Disadvantages of borrowing, such as financial distress, agency costs, and bankruptcy costs.
Most investors are also taxed when they…
Recieve cash.
Personal taxes reduce the…
Cash flows to investors and can offset some corporate tax benefits of leverage.
Debt and equity face…
Differential taxation at the personal level.
The firm should try to minimise the…
Present value of all taxes and maximise the after tax income.
Financial distress occurs when…
Promises to creditors are broken or honoured with difficulty.
The costs depend on…
The probability of distress and the magnitude of losses encountered if distress occurs.
As you borrow more, you increase the…
Probability of distress and hence the expected costs.
Bankruptcy - what are direct costs?
Legal and administrative expenses associated with the bankruptcy proceeding. Such as costs of lawyers, consultants and accountants etc.
Bankruptcy - what are indirect costs?
Difficulties of running a company while it is going through bankruptcy.
Costs arise because people perceive you to be in financial trouble.
It is hard to measure.
What are agency costs?
- Arise because of conflict of interest between shareholders and debtholders.
- Stockholders are tempted to pursue selfish strategies.
- May lead to distorted business decisions before bankruptcy.
Debt levels are chosen to…
Balance interest tax shields against the costs of financial distress.
What is the optimal/target debt level?
The marginal benefit of debt equals the marginal cost.
What is the drawback of the trade off theory?
Difficult to express with precise and rigorous formula. Does not tell us how to mathematically calculate the optimal debt level.
What are the predictions of trade off theory?
- Target debt ratios will vary from firm to firm.
- Profitable firms with safe, tangible assets ought to have high target debt ratios.
- Unprofitable firms with risky, intangible assets ought to rely primarily on equity financing.
Is the trade off theory consistent with the practice?
Regarding assets, the utilities and hotels industry, in practice they use high debt ratios. Firms with risky, intangible assets, rely primarily on equity financing.
In practice, profitable firms use low debt ratios. For example, Microsoft has high operating income, high profitability, uses internal financing and does not borrow much. The trade off theory cannot explain the impact of profitability on capital structure.
Taxes and bankruptcy costs can be viewed as…
Just another claim on the cash flows of the firm.
The value of the firm is paid out to who?
- Shareholders,
- Bondholders
- Bankruptcy claims
- Taxes (government)
The essence of the MM intuition is that…
The total firm value depends on the cash flow of the firm, depends on real assets of the firm.
Capital structure just slices the pie.
If you can decrease tax claims…
You can decrease bankruptcy claims. That way you can increase total claims by bondholders and shareholders. The total size of the pie does not change. It is not affected by capital structure. If capital structure can decrease the slices by tax and bankruptcy claims, the total firm value to bondholders and shareholders will be increased.