lecture five Flashcards
(22 cards)
Entire agreement clause
Written contracts may contain an ‘entire agreement’ clause (CSA 1997, s1(3)).
Timing
Closer to contract = more likely a term (Bannerman v White).
importance
Importance: More important = more likely a term (Couchman v Hill).
expertise and reliance
Expertise & reliance: Expert statement + reliance = likely a term Oscar Chess v Williams
written contract omission
Written contract omission: If not included in writing, likely not a term (Routledge v McKay).
Documents containing additional terms
- Tickets with contracts of carriage? Generally considered contractual
- Invoices? Generally not. (Buchanan & Co v MacDonald (1895) 23 R 264)
- Receipts? Generally not. (McCutcheon v MacBrayne 1964 SLT (HL) 28
verification
Verification: Urging verification = likely not a term (Ecay v Godfrey); discouraging verification = likely a term (Hopkins v Tanqueray).
Has sufficient notice been given?
Grayston Plant Ltd v Plean Precast Ltd
When was notice given?(before contract concludes)
Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking Ltd
Prior course of dealing
McCutcheon v MacBrayne Ltd
Implied terms
- Terms implied in law
- Terms implied in fact
Sale of Goods Act 1979 (business sales):
- s13(1): Goods must match description.
- s14(2): Goods must be of satisfactory quality.
- s14(3): Goods must be fit for buyer’s known purpose.
- s15(2): Goods sold by sample must match the sample and be free from hidden defects.
Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 (business services):
- s13: Services must be carried out with reasonable care and skill.
- s14(1): If no timeframe agreed, service must be done within a reasonable time.
Consumer Rights Act 2015 (Key Points):
- Goods: Must be of satisfactory quality, fit for purpose, and match description/sample.
- Services: Must be performed with reasonable care and skill, within a reasonable time.
- Remedies: Right to reject, repair, replace, or price reduction if terms are breached.
What does J & H Ritchie Ltd v Lloyd Ltd (2007) suggest?
A term is implied if necessary for business efficacy.
What is required for business efficacy in implied terms?
The term must fulfill the intent to give the contract business efficacy (Crawford v Bruce).
What is the ‘officious bystander’ test?
A term is implied if it’s so obvious that the parties would agree to it immediately.
What does the ‘officious bystander’ test mean?
A term is implied if it’s something obvious that parties would automatically accept.
What is the principle from Morton v. Muir Bros (1907)?
Terms are implied if they are necessary for protection and agreeable to both parties.
Conflict with express terms?
A term cannot generally be implied into a contract which contradicts its express terms.
G.M. Shepherd Ltd v North West Securities Ltd
Consumer Rights Act 2015 - Part 2
- Scope: Applies to consumer contracts (s2(3), s76(2)).
- Unfair Terms: Terms are non-binding if unfair (s62(1), s62(2)), causing imbalance or detriment to the consumer (s62(4) & s62(6)).
- Contract Continuity: The contract remains if it can function without the unfair term (s67).
- Grey List: List of terms likely unfair (Part 1 of Schedule 2).
- Key Test: Is the term unfair and on the grey list?
b) Exemption Clauses
- Exclusion of Liability: Consumer contracts cannot exclude liability for death or personal injury (CRA 2015, s65).
- UCTA 1977:
o Exclusion for death/personal injury is void (s16(1)).
o For other losses, clauses must be fair and reasonable (s16(1)). - Fair & Reasonable Test: Based on parties’ knowledge, bargaining power, and the ability to insure (UCTA s24).
- Standard Form Contracts: Unfair terms in standard contracts are unenforceable unless fair and reasonable (UCTA s17).