Legal and Ethical Issues in MH Flashcards
(34 cards)
Consent
a meaningful agreement in which pt has meaningful control over their own lives
Health Care Consent Act (HCCA)
consent to treatment, same for all patients, all treatment and all settings
forbids any non-emergency treatment without informed consent
no conset = failure to obey = professional misconduct
Capacity to Consent
capacity is not dichotomous
depends on the treatment
capacity applies to one treatment in one setting at one time
Return of capacity
After consent to treatment is given or refused on a person’s behalf, once person becomes cable, the patient’s own decision governs
The Elements of Consent
- relate to the treatment
- be informed
- be voluntary
- not be obtained through misrepresentation or fraud
3 Forms of Treatment
- Discreet treatment (i.e. an injection)
- Course of treatment (i.e. course of medication)
- Plan of treatment (treatment of more than one modalities, or by more than one practitioner)
Informed Consent should have:
- nature of the treatment
- expected benefits
- material risks and side effects
- alternative courses of action
- likely consequence of not having treatment
AND answers to questions they have about the above
Evaluating Capacity to Consent
- requires careful documentation of the capacity evaluation process
- record must show the process followed and the information relied upon
- objectivity
- best interest of the patient must not play any role
Capacity to Consent is
A person is capable to consent if:
a. able to understand the information that is relevant to making a decision about treatment
b. able to appreciate the reasonably foreseeable consequences of a decision or lack of decision
the law requires that you have the ABILITY to understand
“could you get it”, not “do you get it”
Presumption of Capacity
A patient is presumed to be capable, no age limit to this presumption
unless you have reasonable grounds to believe that the someone is incapable
The WHY test
ability to understand and appreciate that:
a. there is a problem
b. what you are experiencing or feeling or suffering from is related to a disease
*insight
The WHAT test
ability to understand what the proposed treatment is
The WHAT IF test
ability to appreciate the consequences of a decision or lack of a decision
a. what the options are
b. what is likely to happen if you agree or disagree to treatment
Review of Incapacity
Section 17 of the HCCA
A patient who has been found incapable of consenting to treatment may apply to Consent and Capacity Board for a review
- hearings held within one week
- treatment may not commence if patient has applied or intends to apply to CCB for a review unless SDM is court-appointed
- may continue treatment already started
Commencement of Treatment
- no application is made within 48 hours of being informed of the intention to apply
- the application for review is withdrawn
- Board renders a decision and none of the parties inform of an intent to appeal
- no appeal is filed within 7 days of CCB decision
- appeal from the Board has finally disposed of
Substitute Decision Maker
Section 20 of HCCA
highest person on a ranked list who qualifies for the job
a person qualifies if:
a. available
b. willing
c. mentally capable
d. at least 16 years old
e. not prohibited by court order or separation agreement to consent on patient’s behalf
SDM Ranking
- court appointed guardian
- attorney for personal care
- representative appointed by CCB
- spouse, common law spouse or partner
- parents and children
- brothers and sisters
- any other relative by blood, marriage or adoption
- Public Guardian and Trustee (SDM unit)
- just because someone is “power of attorney”, doesn’t mean they are the person!
Rules for SDM when giving consent
Rule 1: prior capable wishes must be followed
Rule 2: sans prior capable wishes, a “best interest” test applies
Each option must be considered, taking into account
- patient’s values and beliefs
- patient’s non-binding wishes
- treatment likely to improve condition, prevent deterioration, reduce extent or rate of deterioration, expected benefit outweighs the risk, whether less intrusive treatment would be just as beneficial
Emergencies
if person for whom treatment is proposed is apparently experiencing severe suffering or is at risk of sustaining serious bodily harm if the treatment is not administered promptly
Emergency Treatment without Consent (Incapable person)
treatment may be administered without consent if:
a. there is an emergency
b. the delayed required to obtain consent will prolong patient’s apparent suffering and will put patient at risk of sustaining serious bodily harm
treatment may continue until SDM is found or until patient regains capacity
Emergency Treatment without Consent (Capable person)
treatment may be administered without consent if:
a. there is an emergency
b. required communication cannot take place due to language barrier or disability
c. reasonable steps taken to find practical means of enabling communication, without success
d. delay required will prolong suffering or put patient at risk
e. there is no reason to believe that the person doesn’t want treatment
Emergency Treatment without Consent
Treatment despite refusal
treatment may be administered to incapable person despite SDM’s refusal if:
a. there is an emergency
b. SDM did not comply with section 21 of HCCA
Admission for Emergency Treatment
the right to administer emergency treatment without consent includes the right to admit to hospital for the purpose of treatment unless
a. person objects
b. primary purpose of admission is for treatment of MI
Mental Health Law
- allows to us apprehend and detain citizens who are not accused of any crime
- a balance between the need for safety and treatment and the right of every citizen to liberty, autonomy and self-determination