Legal Studies Units 3/4 Exam Flashcards

Question

Limitations of the Judge/Magistrates - Criminal

Answer 1

- Due to their independence, the judge cannot offer the prosecution or an accused assistance, even if the accused is unrepresented or if their legal representative is performing their duties unsatisfactorily - Judges cannot determine the guilt or innocence of the accused in a criminal trial (that is they are not the decider of fact) - even though they may be the best and most qualified to do so

Answer 2

In a Victorian criminal trial the jury is made up of twelve people who are summoned to court and empaneled to decide on the evidence in a case and reach a verdict

Answer 3

Making a decision on the facts of the case - The jury is responsible for giving a verdict as to whether the accused is not guilty or guilty beyond reasonable doubt, in accordance with the law and evidence presented. In doing this, the jury must first try to reach a unanimous verdict. However, if this is not possible after six hours of deliberation, a majority verdict (11 out of 12 jurors) can be accepted in most instances (with the exception of cases of murder, treason, and drug trafficking) Taking part in deliberations - The jury has the responsibility of taking part in deliberations in the jury room so that it is able to deliver a verdict of 'guilty' or 'not guilty' Put aside prejudices - Importantly the jury is required to put aside any personal prejudices or preconceptions so that they can return an unbiased and impartial verdict of 'guilty' or 'not guilty'

Answer 4

- There is always uncertainty as to whether a jury's verdict is based on prejudice or not. Jurors can be influenced by the emotional elements of a trial, their own prejudices. This means that a jury's decision may not be unbiased or based purely based on the facts of the case - Having a jury as the decider of the facts can substantially slow down the trial process. Due to the time associated with empanelling the jury, explaining the law to the jury, and jury deliberations, the entire criminal trial process can be delayed - Because those who sit on a jury have no legal training, it can be argued that they are not the best people to decide on whether or not someone is guilty of a crime. In addition, because the deliberations of a jury are kept secret, there is no way of knowing whether there was one person who was forcing others into a certain decision - The process for choosing a jury, including who can be disqualified or excused from jury service, as well as both sides being able to 'challenge' a set number of jurors, can mean that the jury that eventually decides a case may not represent a true cross-section of society

Answer 5

In a Victorian criminal trial, the prosecution and the accused control their own cases and make decisions regarding how their cases will be run. This is known as party control

Answer 6

Instigating the proceedings (prosecution) - The prosecution is responsible for bringing the case before the court Choosing legal representation (accused) - The accused is responsible for choosing whether to have legal representation, and assuming they chose to, he or she is responsible for selecting their legal representation Attending court (accused) - If charged with an indictable offence, the accused has the responsibility of attending the trial

Answer 7

In a Victorian criminal trial, the legal practitioners for the prosecution and the accused present the cases of each respective side. The legal practitioners for the accused also provide the accused with legal advice and advocacy

Answer 8

Presenting the facts - The legal practitioners for the prosecution and the defence are responsible for choosing how they will present their evidence, which witnesses they will call, and what questions they will ask. The legal practitioners for each side will do this in the way that will best strengthen their cases, though the prosecution has an obligation to bring out all the evidence known to it Represent interests - The legal practitioners for the prosecution and the defence are responsible for representing the interest of each side. The prosecution is responsible for conveying the values and interests of the wider community, and the legal practitioners for the accused are required to advocate for and represent the accused's interests Adhering to rules of evidence and procedure - The legal practitioners for the prosecution and the defence are required to understand and adhere to the strict rules of evidence and procedure which exist in criminal court proceedings Explaining the law and options (legal practitioners for the accused) - The legal practitioners for the defence have the responsibility of explaining the applicable law and the different legal options of the accused to them

Answer 9

- The reliance on legal practitioners in criminal trials can be extremely costly. This is especially true for the accused, who is likely to be faced with high solacer and barrister fees - If the accused is unrepresented, they will also hold most of the responsibilities of a legal practitioner

Answer 10

The main costs a person is likely to incur in a criminal trial case are the costs of engaging with a lawyer to provide legal services such as legal advice or representation

Answer 11

The main cost a party is likely to incur in a criminal trial case are the costs of engaging with a lawyer to provide legal services such as legal advice or representation. Legal services can be provided through legal service providers such as VLA and CLCs, as well as pro bono institutions and some measures are in place to try reduce the costs , such as committal proceedings and plea negotiations, ultimately promoting the principles of fairness, equality and access. However, everyone has the right to legal representation and not everyone can afford it. This can disadvantage accused people in particular, as they lack the necessary skills, experience and objectivity to navigate the system without a lawyer, harming the principle of equality. Additionally, VLA and CLCs are stretched in the number of people they can assist hurting the ability of financially struggling accused people to have a fair trial therefore harming the principle of fairness

Answer 12

Time in a criminal case refers to the right to be tried without unreasonable delay, and that delays should only occur if they are considered reasonable

Answer 13

Time in a criminal case refers to the right to be tried without unreasonable delay, and that delays should only occur if they are considered reasonable. This right is upheld under the Victorian Human Rights Charter. However to address time, there is improved technology and increasing use of virtual hearings that may also help alleviate the pressure, promoting access and reducing delays. Additionally an accused has the right to be tried without unreasonable delay which promotes the principle of access. However on the other hand, there are possible delays in having a trial heard which can affect the ability of the criminal justice system to achieve justice ultimately compromising achieving the principle of access. Furthermore, there are court delays associated with the complexities of the case, so delays are inevitable prolonging the achievement of access

Answer 14

Cultural differences relates to there being different cultures and how we can take measures to ensure the their cases are heard fairly

Answer 15

Cultural differences relates to there being different cultures and how we can take measures to ensure the their cases are heard fairly. An advantage of cultural differences affecting the principle of access is information is also provided by VLA and some CLCs in different languages, allowing access to many. Another advantage is the Koori Court which seeks to address the cultural differences faced by First Nations offenders, promoting equality. A disadvantage is that the Koori court is limited to sentencing only, so First Nations accused must need a fair trial initially for the Koori court to be useful ultimately harming the principle of access. Another disadvantage is First Nations people are overrepresented in the criminal justice system, being more likely to be imprisoned than non-Indigenous people, meaning that the criminal justice system is still struggling to achieve the principles of justice in relation to cultural differences.

Answer 16

One purpose of a sanction, designed to reform an offender in order to prevent them from committing offences in the future. An advantage is that it can help an offender change their attitude and behaviour with the goal of preventing them from reoffending. A disadvantage is the ability for a person to rehabilitate while in prison may depend on the offender, the programs available, and the length of a sentence.

Answer 17

Designed to penalise (punish) the offender and show society and the victim that criminal behaviour will not be tolerated. Society must punish offenders so victims do not seek to punish the offenders themselves. An advantage is punishment through the courts avoids the need for the victim of a crime to take the matter into their own hands. A disadvantage is it can increase recidivism as an imprisoned offender can learn from other criminals.

Answer 18

Designed to discourage the offender and others in the community from committing similar offences. Either General deterrence which is designed to discourage others in the community from committing similar offences or Specific deterrence is designed to discourage the offender from committing further offences. An advantage is reduce recidivism from offenders not recommitting crimes. A disadvantage is specific deterrence may not be as significant if the offender is remorseful, is a first-time offender or if the circumstances of offending are unique.

Answer 19

Designed to demonstrate the community's disapproval of the offender's actions. As part.of its sentencing, the court will seek to reinforce that community expectations and values mean that this type of behaviour is not acceptable, and must be condemned. An advantage is community involvement is highlighted with the use of community expectations and values. A disadvantage is can be very harsh on individual offenders and disproportionate for what crime they have actually committed.

Answer 20

Designed to safeguard the community from an offender by preventing them from committing further offence (e.g by imprisoning the offender). Can also be through a non-custodial sentence like a CCO as they can keep an offender busy and keep them away from certain areas. A advantage is that it protects members of the community from a dangerous offender. A disadvantage is that an offender can be treated unfairly based on potential risk to society

Answer 21

A fine is a sanction that requires the offender to pay an amount of money to the state. The amount of the fine often depends on the maximum penalty units that can be imposted for a certain offence, which is normally stated in the statue setting out that offence Fines can achieve the purposes of punishment and deterrence. Though denunciation also can be achieved. Rehabilitation and protection are less relevant for fines

Answer 22

A flexible, non-custodial sanction 9one that does not involve a prison sentence) that the offender serves in the community, with conditions attached to the order A CCO can achieve all of the purposes of sanctions depending on the circumstances of the offending and the offender. Deterrence, rehabilitation and denunciation are often purposes of imposing a CCO, but protection and punishment can also be achieved

Answer 23

A sanction that involves removing the offender from society for a stated period of time and placing them in prison Imprisonment can achieve all purposes of sanctions, however rehabilitation may not always be achieved due to the offender not wanting to cooperate

Answer 24

Imprisonment is a type of sanction which is an order that an offender serves time in prison, where they are removed from society and are deprived of their liberty and freedom, with a recorded conviction. Imprisonment arguably works to achieve all five of the specific purposes of sanctions, however, there is continual debate in society about how well it achieves the different purposes. For example, while protection of society is very easily achieved through imprisonment, as it involves the offender being physically removed from the community, it is arguably less about achieving rehabilitation, as while prisons do attempt rehabilitation programs for inmates, their effectiveness is limited once the prisoner is released. In relation to punishment and denunciation, imprisonment arguably achieves these quite well, as the denial of liberty for an individual is a very large punishment, as well as very likely to be able to achieve the aim of denunciation. Lastly, in relation to deterrence, imprisonment can act as a general deterrent, since the possibility of going to prison and losing one's freedom discourages most members of the public from committing a crime. However, recidivism rates suggest that imprisonment is ineffective as a specific deterrent. This may be a result of the negative influences an offender becomes exposed to in prison

Answer 25

Aggravating facts are those facts or circumstances relating to the offence, the victim, or the offender which increase the offender's culpability or fault. In this way, aggravating factors work against the accused and are likely to result in a more severe sentence Aggravating factors examples - The offender planned the crime out - The offender used a weapon - The offender committed the crime in the presence of a minor - The offender has a prior criminal record

Answer 26

Mitigating factors are those facts or circumstances relating to the offence, the victim, or the offender which decreases the offender's culpability or fault. In this way, mitigating factors assist the accused and are likely to result in a less severe sentence. However, it is important to note that mitigating factors do not excuse the offender's behaviour Mitigating factors examples - The offender being provoked - The offender having a mental illness or disability - The offender being of character - The offender being young

Answer 27

In sentencing the offender, the magistrate or judge will consider (if applicable) the offender's guilty plea, and will consider the stage at which they entered this plea. Generally the earlier the guilty plea is entered, the more favourable the court will be towards the offender when sentencing them The Sentencing Act provides for sentence discounts for guilty pleas. Meaning that a court must impose a less sever sentence when the offender pleads guilty to an offence

Answer 28

In sentencing, an offender who is guilty of an offence, the court will consider any victim impact statements submitted to the court Victim impact statements detail the effects of the offence on the victim, alongside any injury, loss, or damage suffered by the victim as a direct consequence of the crime. The Sentencing Act outlines the right of victims to make victim impact statements

Answer 29

The burden of proof shows who must prove their case is true. In civil cases, the burden of proof lies with the plaintiff, as it is the party which imitates the civil proceeding

Answer 30

Refers to the degree or strength of the evidence required by the party bringing an action to provide their case. In civil cases, the standard of proof is on the balance of probabilities. This means that the plaintiff must prove that he or she is most probably in the right, whilst the defendant is most probably in the wrong

Answer 31

Before initiating a civil claim, it is very important for the plaintiff to consider the costs associated with pursing a civil action. Initiating and continuing a civil claim can be very expensive and can be a significant financial burden for a plaintiff. Whilst some costs can be avoided, such as solicitor and barrister fees, evading these costs can be very detrimental to the plaintiff's case (may result in the plaintiff being unrepresented in court). Additionally, in a lot of circumstances some costs cannot be avoided, such as subpoena fees, hearing fees, jury fees and out of pocket court expenses. It is also worth noting that pursuing a civil claim can require time away from employment, which may result in a loss of income. Accordingly initiating and pursing a civil claim can potentially cost thousands and thousands of dollars, which should be carefully considered by any potential plaintiff.

Answer 32

Limitation of actions requires that certain civil claims be filed by certain dates, and it is fundamental that potential plaintiffs be aware of these time constraints. For example, defamation cases have a 12 month limitation period. Any civil claim filed outside a limitation period is very likely to be unsuccessful - meaning that it is essential for potential plaintiffs to consider any limitation of actions before initiating a civil case

Answer 33

Enforcement issues are complications which can occur during the application or execution of a court order. For example, problems regarding the payment of compensation by the defendant to the plaintiff, due to the defendant lacking the financial means to make payment. Accordingly, it is very important for potential plaintiffs to consider enforcement issues before commencing civil proceedings

Answer 34

Mediation is an informal process by which two or more parties to a civil dispute cooperatively attempt to resolve their dispute and reach a decision themselves, with the support of at least on independent third party, called a mediator

Answer 35

Mediator is responsible for independently facilitating communication between the plaintiff and the defendant, and ensuring that each party is heard without interfering or offering advice. The mediator should also encourage the parties to explore issues, consider possible outcomes, and reach an agreement, without imposing a decision on the parties. Any decision reached by the parties is not legally binding itself, however, in most situations the parties will enter into legal terms of settlement, which is enforceable through the courts

Answer 36

For many civil cases, mediation tends to be an appropriate dispute resolution method. Mediation will usually be ver appropriate and beneficial when a continuing relationship is required between the disputing parties - such as when the dispute is between neighbours. Mediation has also shown to be appropriate when effective in many family law matters where the preservation of the parties' relationship is paramount. Mediation is also useful in these situations because it allows for the emotion of the case to be heard, rather than needing to present all evidence according to the strict rules of evidence and procedure within a courtroom - emotions can be discussed and can be used in a mediation to develop a more effective solution. Mediation also is most effective when both parties are willing to meet in a spirt of compromise and are prepared to stick ant agreement reached. Additionally, mediation will generally be appropriate in disputes where the defendant has admitted liability, and the only issue is to determine the compensation to be paid to the plaintiff. Nevertheless, there are a number of civil cases where mediation may be an inappropriate method of dispute resolution. Mediation tends to be inappropriate and ineffective as a dispute resolution method when there are overwhelming emotions involved in the disputes that can interfere with the negotiation process. Additionally, mediation is inappropriate in disputes where there is evidence of a gross imbalance of power between the parties, scubas between the employee and employer, if, for example, there has been a charge brought forward by the employee. Mediation may also be inappropriate in disputes where there is a history of dishonest and broken promises, as mediation often requires the goodwill and honesty of the parties to be a successful alternative dispute resolution method

Answer 37

Conciliation is an informal process by which two or more parties to a civil dispute cooperatively attempt to resolve their dispute and reach a decision between themselves, with the assistance and advice of an independent third party called a conciliator

Answer 38

The conciliator is responsible for facilitating communication between the disputing parties and listening to the facts and opinions shared. The conciliator should also offer suggestions, based on their expertise, which assists the parties in reaching an outcome to resolve their dispute. Like mediation, the decision reached by the disputing parties is not legally binding itself, however during conciliation the parties my enter into legal terms of settlement which is enforceable through the courts

Answer 39

Conciliation is appropriate in many civil cases. Like mediation, conciliation is appropriate in civil disputes where a continuing relationship is required between the parties. The dispute resolution method also tends to be appropriate and beneficial in civil cases where both parties are prepared to compromise with one another. Furthermore, conciliation is appropriate in civil cases where one or both disputing parties lack the time or money which is needed for a trial or hearing. Nevertheless, the dispute resolution method of conciliation is inappropriate in a number of cases. Like mediation, conciliation is unlikely to be effective in civil disputes where there are overwhelming emotions at play. Conciliation also tends to be inappropriate in civil cases where there is a gross imbalance of power between the plaintiff and defendant. Additionally, like mediation, conciliation is usually inappropriate in civil cases where there is a history of broken promises and dishonesty by one or both parties.

Answer 40

Arbitration is a process whereby an independent third party listens to the evidence and arguments presented by the parties in a civil dispute, before making a determination which is legally binding on the parties

Answer 41

The arbitrator listens to and analyses the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, before making an independent and unbiased legally binding decision which resolves the parties' dispute.

Answer 42

The dispute resolution method of arbitration tends to be appropriate in a number if civil disputes. Arbitration is very effective and appropriate in civil disputes involving less than $10000 - as shown through the Magistrates' Court referral of such cases to arbitration. Arbitration also tends to be appropriate in civil cases where the disputing parties lack the financial resources to pay for legal representation - as the lack of rules of evidence and procedure in arbitration make it easier for parties to represent themselves Nevertheless, there are a number of instances where arbitration is inappropriate as a dispute resolution method. Firstly, arbitration tends to be inappropriate in disputes with complex questions of law and large amounts of evidence - as these types of cases are generally better handled via judicial determination, where rules of evidence and procedure are present, in the higher courts. Arbitration also tends to be inappropriate in civil law cases involving substantial amounts of money - as a comprehensive and in-depth trial may be necessary and 'safer' than arbitration in such matters

Answer 43

Administrative convenience - The existence of the Victorian court hierarchy allows for civil cases to be distributed according to their complexity and seriousness. This means that the higher courts hear more serious, complex, and lengthy cases whilst the lower courts hear the rather minor, less complex, and shorter cases. In turn, this results in reduced delays in the lower courts, by allowing the minor cases to be dealt with more quickly, without having to wait for the lengthier civil cases, whilst also allowing the higher courts to more easily allocate their time, to make way, more complicated cases Appeals - The existence of the Victorian court hierarchy also allows the system of appeals to operate. The court hierarchy means that a plaintiff or a defendant can have their case or the imposed remedy reassessed by a higher, more superior court to the court which originally decided a matter, if they believe that the original decision was unjust. In turn, this provides for fairness in the Victorian civil justice system, and gives the opportunity for unjust decisions in civil cases to be corrected. However, without the court hierarchy, this avenue of appeal would not exist as there would be no superior court a plaintiff or a defendant could appeal to

Answer 44

In a Victorian civil trial, the judge acts as an impartial and independent umpire who ensures that court processes and procedures are carried out according to strict rules of evidence and procedure. Depending on the civil case, the judge may also be the decider of the facts in the dispute

Answer 45

Ensuring rules of evidence and procedure are followed - The judge is responsible for deciding the admissibility of evidence and ensuring that correct court procedures are followed so that both the plaintiff and defendant have equal opportunity to present their respective cases Deciding questions of law - The judge is responsible for determining the relevant law (that is, the relevant legislation and/or case law) to be applied to the civil case before them; and inn doing so, is responsible for explaining the law to the jury (if one is present) Deciding the remedy - If the judge has ruled in favour of the plaintiff, the judge is responsible for deciding the relevant remedy to be ordered. The judge may be ordered that the defendant pay the plating damages, and/or may impose an injunction, ordering the defendant to do or to refrain from doing something Making a decision on the facts of the case - The judge may be responsible for deciding the outcome of the case; that is, imposing a decision (based on the evidence and the relevant law) in favour of the plaintiff or the defendant. This decision will be made on the balance of probabilities

Answer 46

The passing of the Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic) resulted in Victorian judges receiving a number of powers when dealing with civil cases. Amongst these powers is the power to refer a civil case or party of a cvil case to mediation. This means that judges are able to order the plaintiff and the defendant take part in mediation at ant stage in the pre-trial and/or trial process. In doing so, a judge may refer one or a number of the issues in dispute to mediation, or may refer the entire dispute to mediation. The Act also assets that judges can make these orders without the consent of the parties in dispute The Civil Procedure Act also gives judges the power to give directions or ant order they consider appropriate in order to facilitate the just, efficient, timely, and cost-effective resolution of the issues in a dispute. The Act asserts that such directions can be made in the interest of the administration of justice or in the public interest. The directions and orders made by judges can impose 'any reasonable limits, restrictions or conditions relating to the management and conduct of any aspect of civil proceeding; or the conduct of any party'. For example, an oder may limit the number of witnesses at the trial. The Act also outlines that the directions and order of judges are not limited to imposing such limits, restrictions or conditions. Ultimately, this gives judges a significant amount of influence over civil proceedings

Answer 47

In a Victorian civil trial, a jury is made up of six people who are summoned to court and empanelled to decide on the evidence in a case and reach a verdict

Answer 48

Making a decision on the facts of the case - The jury is responsible for deciding the outcome of the case; that is, reaching a decision (based on the evidence and relevant law) in favour of the plaintiff or the defendant, on the balance of probabilities. In doing this, the jury must first try to reach a unanimous verdict. However, if this is not possible after three hours of deliberation, a majority (5/6) can be accepted Deciding the damages - If the jury has reached a decision in favour of the plaintiff (has decided that the defendant is in the wrong), the jury is responsible for deciding the amount of damages to be awarded to the plaintiff (and paid by the defendant) Take part in deliberations - The jury has the responsibility of taking part in deliberations in the jury room, so that it is able to deliver a decision in favour of the plaintiff or the defendant; and is applicable, so that it can decide the amount of damages to be awarded to the plaintiff Put aside prejudices - Importantly, the jury is required to put aside ant personal prejudices or preconceived ideas so that they can return an unbiased and impartial decision in favour of the plaintiff or the defendant

Answer 49

- There is always uncertainty as to whether a jury's verdict is based on prejudice or not. Jurors can be unduly influenced by the emotional elements of a trial, their own prejudices, and/or or the charisma of legal counsel, meaning that a jury's decision may not be unbiased and based purely on the facts of the case - Having a jury as the decider of facts can substantially slow down the trial process. Due to the time associated with empanelling the jury, explaining the law to the jury, and jury deliberations, the entire civil trial process can be delayed - There is also a flawed assumption that a jury is an accurate cross-representation of society. In fact, there are many varied ways in which people can be excused or excluded from jury service, such as having a background in law enforcement, or, if the trial is going to be lengthy, people can be excused if they have a family that depends upon their income

Answer 50

In a Victorian civil trial, the plaintiff and the defendant control their own cases and make decisions regarding how their cases will be run. This is known as 'party control'

Answer 51

Instigating the proceedings (plaintiff) - The plaintiff is responsible for bringing the case before the court Defending the claim (defendant) - If the matter has proceeded to trial, the defendant is responsible for disputing the claims made by the plaintiff, and if applicable, is responsible for commencing a counter-claim Choosing legal representation - The plaintiff and the defendant are both responsible for choosing whether to have legal representation, and assuming they choose to, they are responsible for selecting their legal representation

Answer 52

Parties to civil cases are limited in that they tend to rely heavily on the advice and assistance of legal practitioners, meaning that if one party is unrepresented and the other has legal representation, the unrepresented party is likely to be greatly disadvantaged in court

Answer 53

In a Victorian civil dispute, the legal practitioners for the plaintiff and the defendant present the cases of each respective side. The legal practitioners for the plaintiff and the defendant also provide the parties with legal advice and advocacy

Answer 54

Presenting the facts - The legal practitioners for the plaintiff and the defendant are responsible for choosing how they will present evidence, which witnesses they will call, and what questions they will ask. The legal practitioners for each side will do this in a way that will best strengthen their case (the lawyers for the plaintiff will present evidence in a way which will prove the liability of the defendant, whilst the lawyers for the defendant will present evidence in a way which will demonstrate that the defendant is not liable) Representing interests - The legal practitioners for the plaintiff and the defendant are responsible for representing and advocating the interests of the parties they are representing Adhering to rules of evidence and procedure - The legal practitioners for the plaintiff and the defendant are required to understand and adhere to the strict rules of evidence and procedure which exist in civil court proceedings Explaining the law and options - The legal practitioners for the plaintiff and the defendant are responsible for explaining the applicable law and the different legal options of the parties they are representing to them

Answer 55

The reliance on legal practitioners in civil trials can be extremely costly. Since most parties need to engage in legal representation, civil disputes typically involve high solicitor and barrister fees

Answer 56

Class actions are legal cases filed by a single representative on behalf of seven or more people. The claims of the parties being in a class action will be based around the same, similar, or related circumstances The significance and benefits of class actions can be seen in the way that they allow those who have been wronged to pursue a claim that would generally be too expensive to pursue independently. Also provides access to justice for those who may be able to achieve just on their own. Benefits the courts as it allows the same matter to be heard in one trial rather than seperate cases However, a disadvantage of class actions is that they limit the ability of individuals to control the proceedings. They can also be difficult for a single lawsuit to represent the needs of all of the involved persons

Answer 57

A class action is a type of proceeding where a group of people, who all have claims against the same party, join together in a proceeding. There are four types of class actions, shareholder class actions, product liability class actions, employee class actions and natural disaster class actions. Group members of the action aren't responsible for any costs, though they'll share costs if the claim is successful. This increases access, allowing people to participate in the civil justice system who would not be able to afford it by themselves. Furthermore, class actions provide a more efficient way of dealing with multiple claims at once, saving time and resources, allowing multiple people to engage with the civil justice system together for the one dispute. On the other hand, class actions are sometimes feared to allow class action lawyers to take advantage because they get more compensation than the actual group members, which may compromise the class actions ability to achieve a fair outcome. Moreover, class actions can also be criticised for taking up a significant amount of court resources and time if it is a large action, hurting other peoples ability to engage with the civil justice system.

Answer 58

Consumers Affairs Victoria (CAV) is Victoria's consumer affairs regulator; a business unit of the Department of Justice and Regulation which oversees business-consumer relations in the state. CAV aims to help Victorians be responsible and informed businesses and consumers. CAV conduct a number of duties, including conciliating disputes between consumers and traders, and between tenants and landlords, as well as educating consumers, tenants, business, and landlords on their rights, responsibilities, and changes to the law

Answer 59

- To ensure businesses comply with consumer laws - To encourage Victorians to exercise their consumer rights - To provide for fair and safe residential tenancies - To encourage a modern and effective consumer law framework

Answer 60

When it comes to the resolution of civil disputes, Consumer Affairs Victoria is appropriate in a number of cases. Given CAV's specialisation and expertise in consumer matters, it is likely appropriate to be appropriate in the resolution of disputes between consumers and businesses. For example, a dispute which arises because a product is believed to be faulty between the purchaser of the product and the business that sold it. Additionally the way in which CAV resolves civil disputes via conciliation makes it very appropriate for the resolution of disputes between tenants and landlords. This conciliatory approach can be of significant value when ti comes to disputes between tenants and landlords, given the fact that an ongoing relationship can be required between these parties, despite the dispute On the contrary, there are a number of matters where CAV may be an inappropriate avenue of civil dispute resolution. Since Consumer Affairs Victoria specialises in resolving disputes between consumers and businesses, and landlords and tenants, it is unlikely to be appropriate in resolving other civil disputes (as it would lack the knowledge and resources to do so). For example, CAV would be extraordinarily inappropriate in resolving family law disputes, as well as disputes between the parties of a contract (outside a consumer-business setting) and civil disputes regarding personal injury. Additionally, CAV is lily to be inappropriate in civil cases where there is already great hostility between the parties. In such civil matters, conciliation is unlikely to be successfully and an adversary approach used by another dispute resolution body is likely to be more effective in resolving the dispute

Answer 61

The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) is an independent tribunal which hears and determines a number of civil law matters. VCAT hears civil cases using informal processes and the decisions of the tribunal are legally binding and enforceable through the courts

Answer 62

- To provide cost-effective civil dispute resolution - To provide timely civil dispute resolution - To provide accessible and informal civil dispute resolution - To provide quality civil dispute resolution heard by expert bodies

Answer 63

In many civil cases, the VCAT is an appropriate avenue for dispute resolution. Given the specialisation of its division and lists, it would generally be appropriate for VCAT to vast a number of civil cases, including those regarding discrimination and equal opportunity residential tenancies and retail tenancies, building and construct, credit, consumer affairs, and even government decisions, such as TAC decisions. It is also generally appropriate VCAT to hear civil disputes where the parties to the case require the dispute to be resolved promptly and cheaply, given the fact that VCAT tends to provide for more cost-effective and timely civil dispute resolution than the courts. Furthermore, the informality of VCAT make it appropriate to hear civil disputes where the parties to the matter may be especially prone to being intimidated by court proceedings Nevertheless, it is inappropriate for VCAT to hear certain types of cases. Firstly, since the tribunal specialises in civil matters, it would be extraordinary inappropriate (and is not possible) for VCAT to hear any criminal law matters. Secondly, the Victorian jurisdiction of VCAT makes it unable to hear disputes between people who are not connected with Victoria. It is also inappropriate for the tribunal to hear certain civil law cases, including disputes between employers and employees, disputes between neighbours about fences or trees and disputes between drives in car accidents. Furthermore, it is arguably inappropriate for VCAT to hear matters involving lengthy and complex evidence and questions of law, as these matters are more likely to be appropriately handled by the courts, which have the legal expertise and time to hear such cases

Answer 64

Costs are a factor that can create issues in relation to the civil justice system. Costs in civil cases are the cost for legal representation, court costs, disbursements and the costs of having to pay some of the other sides costs if the claim or defence is unsuccessful. In line with access, there are bodies/organisations in Victoria that provide pro bono assistance to individuals. This allows individuals who may experience cost issues, the ability to access the civil justice system, especially those who aren't able to afford it. Furthermore, there are alternative dispute resolution methods like mediation, these can resolve a dispute quickly and potentially before trial or hearing, saving time and costs for the parties and the court or VCAT. Therefore, this assists parties the ability to participate in the civil justice system, avoiding delays allowing for the principle of fairness to be achieved. On the other hand, most civil parties cannot access legal aid, as legal aid funding is mainly spent on criminal and family law cases not civil disputes. This compromises some people's ability to participate in the civil justice system as they maybe unable to afford legal representation, which could then compromise fairness by preventing them from receiving a fair outcome. Additionally, the costs of possibly having to pay the other sides costs if a claim or defence is unsuccessful is significant. The risk of having to pay these costs could prevent a plaintiff from initiating a claim, preventing them from participating in the civil justice system and receiving a fair outcome compromising fairness.

Answer 65

Time is a factor that can create issues in relation to the civil justice system. Time issues of a civil dispute are delays that can arise from backlogs, pre-trial procedures, evidence and gathering/preparation. In line with the 'no delays' requirement of fairness, case management powers can allow for the modification of procedures, pleadings, discovery of documents and evidence preparation to reduce delays. Therefore the case management powers can shorten hearings or trials, preventing delays. Furthermore, some matters are now dealt with 'on the papers', which avoids the need for parties to present their cases at a hearing. This prevents time issues like delays and backlogs arising from hearings, thus allowing people to participate in the civil justice system without delays upholding fairness. On the other hand, pre-trial procedures and evidence/preparation can be both complex and lengthy processes, especially discovery which can take months. These can result in delays in the hearing of the civil dispute, therefore compromising fairness. Moreover, backlogs are a big issue in the civil justice system. Backlogs are delays in having cases listed for hearing or trial, depending on the court or VCAT list. These backlogs delays do not align with the fairness requirement of having 'no delays', therefore preventing the achievement of fairness.

Answer 66

Damages are a type of civil remedy in the form of a sum of money, paid by the defendant and given to the plaintiff, as a result of a civil claim made by the plaintiff. The general purpose of damages is to compensate the plaintiff for losses suffered

Answer 67

Damages which aim to compensate the plaintiff for the injury suffered, to the extent that the money is able to do so. The purpose of compensatory damages is to restore the plaintiff whose rights have been infringed to the position they were in before the infringement occurred, by financially compensating them for losses suffered Specific damages - Damages which can be given in a precise monetary value, and which are easily quantifiable (damages for medical expenses) General damage - Damages which will be assessed by the court according to the magnitude of the wrong done and the long-term consequences of the wrong. General damages are given as a general estimate, as they are not easily quantifiable (damages for pain and suffering) Aggravated damages - Additional compensatory damages which can be awarded to the plaintiff if the court believes that the defendant's conduct resulted in the humiliation and insult of the plaintiff

Answer 68

Damages awarded to the plaintiff of only a small monetary amount, because the aim of the damages is not to compensate the plaintiff, but rather to make the point that the plaintiff is legally in the right and to show that the plaintiff's civil rights had been infringed. Therefore, the purpose of nominal damages is to make the point that the plaintiff is legally in the right, and/or to show that the defendant had infringed the plaintiff's civil rights

Answer 69

Damages awarded to the plaintiff of only a small sum of money, because despite having a legal right to damages, the court believes that the plaintiff does not have a moral right to damages - that is, they do not deserve to be paid damages. Therefore, the purpose of contemptuous damages is to express the court's disapproval of the plaintiff's claim, whilst recognising that the plaintiff has a legal (but not a 'moral) right to damages

Answer 70

Damages of a rather large sum of money, awarded to the plaintiff with the aim of making an example the defendant and punishing them for engaging in reckless, malicious, and/or cruel behaviour which showed a scornful disregard of the plaintiff's rights. Therefore, the purpose of exemplary damages is to punish the defendant for their reckless, malicious, or cruel behaviour, whilst also making an example of them and deterring them and others from replicating the behaviour

Answer 71

An injunction is a court order directing someone to stop or to refrain from doing something, or to do something. Injunctions can be granted either before a trial, in order to prevent someone from continuing to perform the alleged action, or force them to do something prior to the court case. Injunctions can then either be continued, or created, at the conclusion of a trial. They can be permanent, or only for a certain amount of time. The general purpose of an injunction is to rectify a situation caused by a person who has been found to be in the wrong, by ordering them to do something, or to stop or refrain from doing something

Answer 72

An injunction which orders someone to stop (or to refrain) from doing something; such as an order stopping someone from going to a particular place. Therefore, the purpose of restrictive injunctions is to stop or refrain someone from doing something, is an attempt to preserve the position of a party

Answer 73

An injunction which orders a person to do a particular act; such as an order compelling someone to perform a service. Therefore, the purpose of a mandatory injunction is to order someone to do a particular act and attempt to rectify a situation

Answer 74

Damages are an amount of money awarded by the courts to compensate the plaintiff for loss or injury caused by the wrongful act from the defendant. The types of damages are exemplary, nominal, contemptuous and compensatory which includes general, specific and aggravated damages. In line with the fair outcome requirement of fairness, damages aim to restore the plaintiff to their original position before the harm occurred. This can include reimbursement for financial losses such as medical expenses, lost wages and property damages. The ability of damages to restore the plaintiff to their original position is what can create a fair outcome for them. thus upholding fairness. Furthermore, especially with exemplary damages, adequate punishment and deterrence can be served by damages. By imposing financial penalties beyond just compensation, exemplary damages reinforce society values and discourage wrongful actions. Therefore, these damages can prevent a defendant from committing further harm to the plaintiff while upholding fairness through the provision of a fair outcome. On the other hand, while financial losses can be relatively simple to calculate, non-economic damage such as pain and suffering, mental anguish or disfigurement are not easily quantifiable. These types of losses generally cannot be fully addressed by monetary compensation, leaving some plaintiffs lacking the remedy they deserve, thus affecting fairness. Moreover, the effectiveness of damages achieving punishment and deterrence depends on the amount of money awarded and the financial status of the defendant. If the award is too small or the defendant is wealthy, it may not serve as an adequate deterrent or punishment, thus not being a fair outcome and compromising fairness.

Answer 75

The Commonwealth parliament of Australia consists of the king represented by the governor-general, the senate (upper house) and the House of representatives (lower house). Key roles are to make laws and represent the people of Australia.

Answer 76

The Victorian parliament consists of the king represented by the governor of Victoria, the Legislative council (the upper house) and the Legislative assembly (the lower house). Key roles are to make laws and represent the people of Australia.

Answer 77

- Both crown representatives grant or withhold royal assent, and are the apex of their structures of parliament. - Both upper houses act like a house of review - Both lower houses are the houses of government, can initiate and make laws, can publicise and scrutinise government administration and they represent the people.

Answer 78

- The Commonwealth has a governor-general as a king representative, while Victorian parliament has a governor. - Commonwealth's upper house is the Senate which has 76 members from 6 states (12 per state) and 2 territories (2 each), irrespective of population, determined by the Constitution. Victorian parliament's upper house is the Legislative Council which has 40 members from 5 regions, amount of representatives per region being determined by its population. - The Commonwealth's lower house is the House of Representatives which has 151 seats, whereas the Victorian parliament's lower house is the Legislative Assembly which has 88 seats.

Answer 79

Part of the Australian system of government and is represented by one governor-general and six state governors. Crown representatives in Australia are responsible for ensuring that the democratic system operates effectively. They are are required to grant royal assent, approve bills to make them law, also having the power to withhold royal assent but they normally approve bills on the advice of the Prime minister. They appoint the executive council including the Prime minister, state premiers, senior ministers and assistant ministers, who are all meant to give advice to the crown's representative on matters such as whether to approve regulations.

Answer 80

Powers which can only be exercised by the commonwealth parliament. Examples of powers include: - defence which is section 51 (vi) and made exclusive by section 114 - customs and border protection which is section 51 (iii) made exclusive by section 90 and - currency which is section 51 (xii) made exclusive by section 115

Answer 81

Law-making powers that both the commonwealth and state parliaments share. Examples of powers include: - trade section 51 (i), - taxation section 51 (ii) (GST for commonwealth stamp ad payroll tax for states) - marriage and divorce section 51 (xxi and xxii) - communication services like postal, telegraphic, telephonic and similar services in section 51 (v).

Answer 82

Law-making powers left with the states at the time of federation. Not listed in the Constitution. Powers are areas of law such as criminal law, medical procedures, road laws, education and public transport.

Answer 83

If a state parliament passes a law in an area where there is a commonwealth law, the federal law will prevail over the state law to the extent of any inconsistency. Section 109 doesn't automatically allow states to pass an inconsistent law, the law needs to be challenged before it is declared invalid. Section 109 can act as a restriction on the states in implementing their legislative programs and mandates

Answer 84

R v Brislan; Ex PARTE WILLIAMS [1935] was a case that occurred in 1935 over a wireless set. The accused (Brislan) was charged under the Wireless Telegraphy Act (1905) with having a wireless set without holding a license for it, as it was required by the Commonwealth Act. Brislan accused the validity of the Act, claiming that the Constitution did not give the Commonwealth Parliament the power to legislate with regards to wireless sets and brought in Section 51 (v) into question which gave Commonwealth the power to legislate over ‘postal, telegraphic, telephonic and other like services’. Since wireless services weren’t mentioned in Section 51 (v), Brislan believed that this Act should be deemed invalid. The High Court ruled that wireless sets fitted in ‘other like services’ and extended its meaning, ruling against Brislan. The significance of this case is that it resulted in a shift in the division of law-making powers from the states to the Commonwealth, meaning that the Commonwealth Parliament gained power while the state parliament lost power. Furthermore the High Court ruling remains significant because it means that the Commonwealth would have power to make laws with respect to broadcasting, and if state laws were to come into conflict section 109 of the Constitution would apply.

Answer 85

The Bicameral structure of Parliament is a factor that can affect the ability of Parliament to make law. Both the Commonwealth and Victoria have a bicameral parliament, which means they have two houses. Section 1 of the Australian Constitution requires Commonwealth to be bicameral, the Constitution Act 1975 (Vic) requires Victorian parliament to be bicameral.

Answer 86

Signing and ratifying international treaties pressure the Australian government to change state laws to meet international obligations and maintain its global reputation. Ratification makes treaties legally binding, bringing about necessary law changes, through the force of global obligations and reputation. For example, climate change applies pressure on Australia to create laws and regulations to reduce emissions. Coal is one of Australia's biggest exports, and therefore revenue generator. In the past, while Australia has set targets to reduce emissions, those targets have been criticised for being too low. However, in 2022, the Commonwealth parliament passed the Climate Change Act 2022 (Cth), which enshrined into law: an emissions reduction target of 43% from 2005 levels by 2030, and net zero emissions by 2050. Pressure on Australia to act on climate change is coming from the UN, groups like Greenpeace, other countries and individuals like Greta Thunberg. Pressure on Australia to not act on climate change is coming from the coal and mining organisations, certain and political parties, like the one nation party.

Answer 87

Australia is a diverse country, and Australia's parliament is expected to represent the values of all our communities. However, across all Parliaments in Australia while female representation is increasing, the number of First Nations members of Parliament or those who have non-European backgrounds are below the general population. Some have argued that this means some groups and their interests are not well represented. Although, some argue that they can understand the community through other ways, like petitions, demonstrations, and bodies like VLRC.

Answer 88

Parliament is the supreme law-making body of Australia, but doesn't have absolute power due to the Constitution. Section 71 of the Constitution provides the High court with jurisdiction to hear matters where Commonwealth is a party, and disputes between states. Also interpretation of the Constitution disputes, given by Section 76. The existence of the High court allows individuals who have an interest in the case to bring the matter to court and have a law overturned, especially ones not upholding the principle of representative government, reinforcing that members of parliament are not above the law. Furthermore, both the High court and the principle of representative government are contained in the Constitution and therefore can only be abolished if there is a referendum. On the other hand, High court judges cannot protect the principle of representative government unless a case is brought before them. These cases are often complex and expensive for the average person, and standing is required. Moreover, the interpretation of the scope of the principle, such as the ability of people to vote in the elections and the extent of the freedom of political communication, could be subject to further change if a future High court interprets the constitution differently. Overall, the High court effectively protects the principle of representative government through the Constitution.

Answer 89

The doctrine (or principle) of the Separation of Powers requires the three main branches of the Australian parliamentary system, the Executive which administers the law, the Legislature which makes the law and the Judiciary which enforces the law, which operate independently of each other. It provides checks and balances so that no one branch has absolute power over the functions of the political and legal system, and as such is one of the core principles of the rule of law. The separation of powers is specifically provided for in the Australian Constitution, therefore cannot be abolished without a referendum. Furthermore, despite the overlap between the executive and legislative branches of government, there are still some measures in place to ensure the executive is independent from the legislature. On the other hand, the separation of powers in the Australian Constitution doesn't extend to states, although the states separately provide for separation of powers in state constitutions or statutes. Moreover, the ability of the judiciary to act as a check on parliament is dependent on people's willingness to change laws. That is, the courts can only act as a check on parliament- when there is a case before them, and that requires someone willing and able to initiate such a case. Overall, the separation of powers effectively acts as a check on parliament by having delegated independent powers to control different areas.

Answer 90

An express right is a right that is specifically listed in a document or the Constitution. There are only five express rights, such as the right to freedom of religion of (Section 116). Express rights operate as an explicit check on the powers of Parliament. Express rights are entrenched and cannot be removed or changed without successful referendum. Referendums are difficult to pass, so express rights will continue to act as a check on Parliament without risk of being removed. Furthermore, the High court is independent and will make decisions protecting the express rights even if they are contrary to the views or preferences of the governments. On the other hand, as referendums are so hard to pass, express rights in the Constitution have not increased in number or been amended since Federation. This reduces the checks on government as there is unlikely to be more rights added to act as a check on Parliament in the future. Moreover, the express protection of rights doesn't prevent the Commonwealth parliament from passing the law. It will require the law to be challenged in the court for the law to be declared invalid. Overall, express rights are able to effectively act as a check on parliament as they are entrenched and are interpreted by the independent High court.

Answer 91

- The bill might not have taken future circumstances into account - The intention of the bill might not have been clearly expressed - Mistakes in the drafting of a bill - Words may have changed their meaning over time or might be ambiguous - The act might be silent on an issue and the courts may need to fill gaps in the legislation

Answer 92

- The word or phrases contained in the disputed legislation are given meaning - The court's decision on the meaning of the legislation is binding on the parties - A precedent may be set for future cases to follow. - The meaning of the legislation (law) can be restricted or expanded

Answer 93

A precedent established in the superior courts must be followed by lower courts in the same hierarchy when resolving disputes with similar material facts. Also called ratio decidendi, Latin for 'the reason for the decision'. Stare decisis is another related Latin term, meaning 'to stand by what has been decided'.

Answer 94

Precedents not binding on a court that may still be considered by a judge and be used to influence their decision. Persuasive precedents may be set by courts in another court hierarchy (another state, territory or country), set by lower courts in the same hierarchy or set by courts of the same level in the same hierarchy which is not binding but usually followed anyway.

Answer 95

When a superior court changes a previous precedent set by a lower court in the same case on appeal, thereby creating a new precedent which overrides the earlier precedent.

Answer 96

When a superior court changes a previous precedent, established by a lower court in a different and later case, thereby creating a new precedent which overrules the earlier precedent.

Answer 97

The process by which a lower court decides that the material facts of a case are sufficiently different from those of a case in which a precedent was established by a superior court so that they are not bound to follow it.

Answer 98

When a court expresses dissatisfaction with an existing precedent but is still bound to follow it. Usually expressed by judges in lower courts about precedents they disagree with but are forced to follow.

Answer 99

The doctrine of precedent can both enable and restrict the ability of courts to make law. The doctrine of precedent is the process of judges following the legal reasoning behind the decisions of the higher courts. Stare decisis is a related Latin term, meaning 'to stand by what has been decided'. Being the highest court in the hierarchy, the High court's decisions set binding precedents for all lower courts, allowing them to make laws that lower courts must follow. Furthermore, the High court can overturn outdated or wrong precedents, allowing them to improve the law overall. On the other hand, High court judges may be reluctant to change an existing precedent preferring Parliament to change the law as the supreme law-making body. Moreover, High court judges can only establish precedents when a case is brought before them. Overall, the doctrine of precedent is effective in enabling the High court to make law, while ensuring balance law-making.

Answer 100

The doctrine of precedent can both enable and restrict the ability of courts to make law. The doctrine of precedent is the process of judges following the legal reasoning behind the decisions of the higher courts. Stare decisis is a related Latin term, meaning 'to stand by what has been decided'. As the doctrine of precedent allows for flexibility, this assists the lower courts in having the ability to make law. However, the lower courts can only establish precedents and make law when a case is brought before them, and these precedents are not binding. Furthermore, with flexibility lower courts can distinguish their cases from existing precedents if the facts are sufficiently different, allowing them to create law to resolve their cases if needed. On the other hand, lower courts must follow binding precedents from higher courts even though they may consider it outdated or inappropriate. Overall, the doctrine of precedent does allow lower courts to make law to an extent but is also restrictive on them.

Answer 101

Courts cannot make law until a case is brought before them, requiring a litigant able and willing to afford bringing a case to court in regard to financial and time costs. Courts can make law relatively quickly once a dispute has been brought before them and cases must continue until a decision has been made to resolve the dispute. On the other hand, the courts cannot make law until a case is brought before them which can be a long period even when it is clearly necessary that there must be change. Furthermore, courts are not required to follow lengthy processes like those involved in the process of developing, drafting and passing a bill through parliament when deciding cases. Thus, allowing quick law-making. However, some courts, particularly appeal courts where most precedents are established, can take months to hear and determine more complex cases. Overall, time can be a large factor in courts law-making.

Answer 102

The conservative judicial approach is when judges adopt a narrow interpretation of the law when interpreting Acts of Parliament and deciding cases. Exercising the conservative approach helps maintain stability in the law, upholding predictability through judges being cautious and showing restraint. On the other hand, although the conservative approach ensures consistency, it can restrict courts from making new law by strictly following past rulings, preventing common law advancement. Furthermore, the conservative approach promotes Australia's democratic system, by leaving law-making to the people's elected Parliament. However, as this approach leaves most law-making with Parliament, it prevents the courts from making major and controversial changes in the law. Overall, the conservative approach is very limiting on the ability of courts to make law, acting as a more simple and uniform approach for judges.

Answer 103

Judicial activism mainly refers to the willingness of judges to consider a range of social and political factors when interpreting the law and making decisions. It allows judges to more freely, broadly interpret statutes in a way that recognises the rights of the people and may lead to more fair judgments. Furthermore, the activism judicial approach allows judges to be more creative when making decisions and making significant legal change, resulting in more tailored decisions to the certain case. On the other hand, judicial activism can lead to courts making more radical changes in the law that do not reflect the community values or are beyond the community's level of comfort. Moreover, decisions made by judges using the activism approach are not set in stone as Parliament is the supreme law-making body, therefore it can abrogate any decisions it does not agree with. Overall, the activism approach is useful in judges making more fair decisions that are beneficial to the people.

Answer 104

Courts cannot make law until a case is brought before them, requiring a litigant able and willing to afford bringing a case to court in regard to financial and time costs. Costs involved in bringing a case to court are mainly legal representation, filing fees, hearing fees and court fees. The courts have the ability to manage disputes to narrow the issues in dispute, possibly saving the parties costs and allowing them to proceed all the way to trial for a final determination. Furthermore, the high costs may mean that only meritorious and legitimate claims are pursued all the way to appeal courts, saving court resources. On the other hand, high costs can deter litigants who cannot afford it, and who do not qualify for legal aid, from pursuing their case and their rights in court. Therefore preventing them from gaining a fair outcome. Moreover, the nature of costs may mean that old or 'bad' precedents are never challenged or brought to the court for review, preventing necessary law adjustments. Overall, there a range of costs that may impact an individual or group trying to bring a case to court.

Answer 105

Courts must wait until a party decides to pursue a case before they can create precedent and make law. With this party requiring standing to pursue a case. Standing is the requirement that a party must be directly affected by the issues or matters involved in a case for the court to be able to hear and determine it, sometimes referred to as locus standi The requirement for standing ensures that only those with a direct and significant interest in the case can bring it before the court, allowing the court to focus on the more pressing legal issues. Furthermore, by filtering out cases brought by individuals without standing, this helps ensure that courts time and resources are used efficiently. On the other hand, the standing requirement can prevent individuals or groups with a broader interest in a legal issue from bringing it to court. This prevents courts from addressing issues that affect society as a whole but may not directly impact a single individual. Moreover, if there is an important issue but no directly affected party comes forward, the standing requirement could lead to missed crucial improvements to the law. Overall, the standing requirement can ensure their is a system of priority in cases brought to court but can also result in vital cases being missed.

Answer 106

Parliament, as the supreme law-making body, can make and change any law within its constitutional power. It can pass legislation to abrogate (cancel) law made by courts (except for High Court decisions on constitutional matters) and codify common law. Parliament is also responsible for passing legislation to create most courts and determine their jurisdictional power. While parliament is the supreme law-making body, the High Court can resolve disputes involving the Australian Constitution and may declare legislation made beyond the parliament's law-making power invalid, and alter the division of law-making power between the Commonwealth Parliament and state parliaments.

Answer 107

Courts can indirectly influence parliament to make and change the law by making comments when handing down judgments that inspire or encourage parliament to initiate law reform. A court's decision may also highlight a legal problem, or cause public outcry, that places pressure on the parliament to change the law. Judges in superior courts can only do this when a case is brought before them and in relation to the issues involved in the case. This relies on an aggrieved party having standing in the case, and the financial means and willingness to pursue a potentially long and stressful case. The court's ability to influence parliament is also limited by the parliament's supremacy role and in particular its willingness to change the law.

Answer 108

As the supreme law-making power, parliament can pass legislation to codify common law, which means to assemble all the relevant law in a particular area to create one all-encompassing law. Parliament can also pass legislation that endorses principles established by courts, clarify or expands on them. Some areas are established by common and statute law, due to being codified or partially codified over time. Codification is limited by parliament's supremacy role and whether it is willing to pass legislation to codify law. This also means that it is dependent on factors that limit or restrict the ability of parliament to make law such as the composition of parliament.

Answer 109

Parliament has the power to pass legislation that abrogates (cancels) decisions made through the courts, with the exception of decisions on the Australian Constitution. The abrogation of common law could potentially lead to an unjust law if the parliament overrides a valid legal principle, that has been established and considered by multiple independent and experienced judges, to suit a short-term or populist political agenda. Parliament may be limited or unwilling to abrogate law, even if it is bad law.

Answer 110

Law must keep up with these changes, but not change too quickly that the community doesn't accept it. Society is constantly evolving and laws must reflect the current society in order to keep citizens agreeing and following it. Examples are increasing vape and e-cigarette laws as well as LGBTQIA+ equality laws.

Answer 111

Laws must remain relevant and keep up with social, economic and international living conditions. Social changes prompting law reforms include increase in reported domestic violence, binge drinking, gang-related crimes and online gambling. Economic changes prompting law reforms are technology and globalisation issues, and governmental regulations. International changes in prompting law reforms are increasing global violence, threat of terrorist attacks and international conflict like war.

Answer 112

Technological advancement creates the need for laws to control and regulate new inventions and opportunities, and ones to reduce the likelihood of people being harmed or exploited. For example, the increasing range and use of mobile devices and equipment have created issues that law needs to address like cyber-bulling, cyber-stalking, online scams, invasions of privacy and noise pollution from drones.

Answer 113

Laws must make the people feel safe and protect them from harm. Includes all people but especially those who are vulnerable and have specific needs and rights, also includes protection of animals and the environment. Recent law reforms to protect specific groups are The Education and Training Reform Amendment (Protection of School Communities) Act 2021 (Vic), and The Livestock Management Amendment (Animal Activism) Act 2021 (Vic).

Answer 114

Petitions are a formal written request to the Parliament to take some action or implement law reform. Petitions enable direct communication with Parliament for individuals or groups to communicate their desire for legislative change to Parliament. Furthermore, even if a petition doesn't immediately lead to law reform, it can attract media attention, influencing Parliament to change the law anyway. For example, the 2019 e-petition to the Commonwealth Parliament was calling for the House of representatives to declare a climate emergency and introduce legislation to address climate change, this was a large scale petition that generated a lot of media attention. On the other hand, petitions must follow specific rules and regulations to not be disregarded, such as needing to be tabled by a member of Parliament, like how the 2019 e-petition was tabled by independent MP Zali Steggall. Moreover, petitions may take time to influence change and may not receive ongoing media attention, reducing their effectiveness.

Answer 115

A demonstration is a gathering of people to protest or express their common concern or dissatisfaction with an existing law as a means of influencing law reform. Demonstrations have the ability to increase visibility and raise awareness about issues. Large-scale protests, especially those covered by the media, can influence law reform by drawing attention to problems that may be overlooked otherwise. Furthermore, demonstrations involve the unity of many community members, making the issues they are raising hard to ignore. On the other hand, demonstrations risk negative media coverage, dividing the community and Parliament, leaving successful law reform unlikely. Moreover, demonstrations lack immediate impact and must occur multiple times to pressure Parliament into making law reform.

Answer 116

Individuals and groups can influence a change in the law through a judge's decision by challenging the validity, meaning or fairness of an existing law in the courts. Courts can verify vague or outdated laws, being able to ensure they align with the current values and needs of the community. In the Masson v Parsons case, the High court expanded the definition of parentage to broaden the previously narrow definition under NSW state law. Furthermore, a court ruling can prompt lawmakers to reconsider and change existing law to reflect new interpretations or societal changes, like how the High court's decision set a precedent for cases involving sperm donors and parental rights. On the other hand, challenging law through the courts can be costly and complex, limiting some individuals ability to do so, in this case Ms. Parsons and her partner incurred in excess of $800,000 in legal costs. Moreover, courts can only make rulings based on current legislation and their ability to interpret it, only being able to make common law and establish precedents in line with the existing legal framework, limiting the scope of legal change.

Answer 117

The Australian media plays a crucial role in law reform by investigating issues, shaping public opinion, and influencing lawmakers. This impact comes through social media, as well as print and broadcast media. Print media like newspaper and TV expose issues and injustices, generating public outrage to push for legal change. Media coverage and surveys can define community views, influencing lawmakers to consider law reform based on community support or opposition. Moreover, Social media can enable immediate reporting, influencing law reform while allowing direct communication between the public and lawmakers. On October 21, 2019, Australia's major newspapers blacked out their front pages to protest against legislation seen as restricting media freedom, this raised community awareness and pressured lawmakers to law reform. Additionally, influential documentaries 'KaChing! Pokie Nation' exposed harm caused by poker machines and 'Blue' highlighting environmental damage to oceans and the Great Barrier Reef, both advocated and led to law reforms.

Answer 118

Victorian Law Reform Commission (VLRC) is Victoria's leading independent law reform organisation. The VLRC reviews, researches and makes recommendations to the state parliament about possible changes to Victoria's laws. In line with the aim, the VLRC can measure community views on areas of investigation by holding consultations and receiving public submissions, and then reflect them in recommendations, upholding an inclusive legal system. The VLRC's inquiry into making juries more inclusive highlights its role in reflecting community views and maintaining objectivity. Furthermore, as the VLRC is independent of Parliament and political parties, it can remain objective and unbiased in making its recommendations. The VLRC's independence from political pressures allowed it to focus solely on the needs of potential jurors with sensory impairments without being swayed by political agendas. On the other hand, the Victorian Parliament is not forced to support or adopt any of the VLRC's recommendations for law reform, restricting VLRC's ability to improve the legal system. Moreover, the VLRC is limited by how many projects it can undertake at a time, and can only initiate investigations without a reference if it will not use too many resources. Therefore, its ability to investigate issues without a reference from the Attorney-General is limited. In the case of the jury inclusivity inquiry, the VLRC had to manage its resources carefully while addressing this important issue. Although the VLRC has its drawbacks, because all or most of its recommendations have been adopted in approximately 75 per cent of completed inquiries, these statistics alone suggest that the VLRC can be highly influential on the Victorian Parliament.

Answer 119

Royal Commissions are major public inquiries established by the government to investigate an area or matter of public importance or concern in Australia. The Royal Commission into the Robodebt scheme is a recent example of how Royal Commissions can influence law reforms. Governments can use the findings and recommendations of Royal Commissions to justify making changes in the law and government policy. In this example, the Commission's final report, in July 2023, provided a detailed analysis and made several vital recommendations. Furthermore, Royal Commissions can measure community views on areas of investigation by holding consultations and receiving public submissions, during the Robodebt Royal Commission, there were written and oral submissions sent from the public. However, there is no obligation for Parliament to support or introduce legislation which adopts any of the recommendations made by Royal Commissions, although the Robodebt scheme led to some recommendations being considered, some were dismissed. Moreover, the ability of Royal Commissions to influence law reform depends on the timing of its reporting and its time of reference. On balance, Royal Commissions are very effective in influencing law reform.

Answer 120

The Australian Constitution has historically lacked recognition of First Nations people, who have lived on the continent for over 65,000 years. Prior to 1967, it explicitly excluded them from the national population, leaving their affairs to individual states, leading to inconsistent laws. There have been calls to amend the Constitution to include a First Nations Voice to Parliament and to honor First Nations people, though previous attempts, like the 1999 referendum have been unsuccessful.

Answer 121

The Australian Constitution contains five express rights that limit the Commonwealth Parliament's law-making powers, such as the prohibition of laws restricting religious practice under section 116. However, these rights are narrow and primarily serve as restrictions rather than broad protections. Most rights in Australia are safeguarded by statute or common law rather than the Constitution. There have been calls to amend the Constitution to better protect democratic freedoms or to clarify or broaden the existing express rights.

Answer 122

The Australian Constitution allocates law-making powers between the Commonwealth and the states, with specific powers assigned exclusively to each and others shared. The Commonwealth has proposed constitutional changes in the past to extend its powers in areas such as company regulation and aviation, but many proposals were rejected. However, a 1946 proposal to expand federal authority over social services was successful. There have also been suggestions to reduce Commonwealth powers, such as removing the controversial "race power" in section 51(xxvi), which allows laws affecting different races and has been criticized for enabling potential racial discrimination.

Answer 123

A final reason why there may be a need to change the Australian Constitution is to reform our political system. In particular, there have been suggestions to change the Constitution in relation to the timing of federal elections, to allow more people to be members of the Commonwealth Parliament, and to substantially change our political system so that it becomes a republic. Some of the suggestions include extending the term of the House of Representatives from three to four years, and altering the terms of the Senate, which was proposed but rejected in 1988.

Answer 124

Any proposed change to the Australian Constitution must first be introduced and passed in the Commonwealth Parliament. Therefore, the Commonwealth Parliament has the overall power to decide whether to introduce a change to the Constitution.

Answer 125

For a referendum to succeed, it must meet the double majority requirement: a majority of voters nationwide and a majority of voters in at least four of the six states must vote 'yes.' This ensures that smaller states have an equal voice in the decision, preventing larger states from dominating the outcome.

Answer 126

A factor affecting the success of a referendum is Bipartisan support, which refers to approval by two or more political parties, typically from the Australian Labor Party and the Liberal Party in Australia. It is crucial for the success of a referendum, as it often influences voter approval. Without support from major parties, opposing campaigns can sway voters, who may rely on their preferred party's stance to guide their vote.

Answer 127

One factor that can affect the success of a referendum is whether the people themselves support and actively promote the change, or whether it is owned and supported by the government itself. If voters themselves are driving the change, they may be more willing to vote 'yes'.

Answer 128

A factor affecting the success of a referendum is whether the proposed change is straightforward and accessible or complex and difficult to understand. If the people do not understand the proposed change they will be more likely to vote 'no', leading to an unsuccessful referendum. Conversely, being more inclined to vote 'yes' if the proposal is clear, sensible and straightforward.

Answer 129

The Australian Constitution is rarely the subject of mainstream media analysis, and the general public has very little knowledge of the Constitution and government and parliament structures. This can create challenges when voters are asked to consider changing something they know very little about. Effective success in a referendum often relies on a strong information and education campaign that clearly explains the proposed changes and addresses both the 'yes' and 'no' cases, especially given the influence of social media and potential misinformation.

Answer 130

In 1967, a referendum was put to the people about whether to change the Australian Constitution in relation to Aboriginal people. The change would have resulted in allowing the Commonwealth to make laws about First Nations people, and would have allowed First Nations people to be formally counted in the national census. The proposed change was unanimously passed in the Commonwealth Parliament. The 1967 referendum saw strong public backing, largely due to the proposal being driven by decades of First Nations advocacy, which fostered a sense of ownership and commitment among voters. Furthermore, the successful referendum allowed for significant legislation, such as the Native Title Act 1993, which allowed First Nations people to claim land rights and led to the nullification of discriminatory state laws. On the other hand, the referendum's success was partly due to the absence of a strong 'no' campaign, which resulted from bipartisan support. This lack of opposition may have led to a less debate of the proposed change and might not have fully considered potential concerns or alternative perspectives. Moreover, despite the constitutional change, the Commonwealth was slow to address state law inconsistencies, showing that constitutional amendments do not always translate into immediate policy action.

Answer 131

Over the years, First Nations people have advocated for Constitutional recognition and political representation, culminating in the 2017 Uluru statement from the Heart. This statement called for a Constitutionally enshrined First Nations Voice to Parliament to provide input on relevant laws and policies, as well as the establishment of a Makarrata Commission for treaty negotiations and truth-telling. On June 19, 2023, Parliament passed the Constitution alteration 2023, allowing for a referendum to decide on including this Voice in the Australian Constitution. This referendum was ultimately unsuccessful after receiving a majority "no" vote by the Australian public.

Legal Studies Units 3/4 Exam Flashcards

(156 cards)