Legal Unit 3 AOS2- CAV, VCAT & the courts Flashcards
(18 cards)
Institution
The place where a dispute is resolved & is also know as a dispute resolution body
CAV
Consumer Affairs Victoria
- regulator and complaints body
CAV jurisdiction
Limited jurisdiction
- Supply of goods & services (only consumers)
- Residential tenancy disputes (only tenants)
CAV purposes
Help people settle their consumer law disputes
- Efficiently
- Constructively
- Without any cost
CAV method
Conciliation
- Expert teams devoted to certain types of disputes
- Usually conducted over the phone
- It is voluntary & can’t compel people to participate
- Usually sign terms of settlement if a decision is reached
CAV appropriateness
- Is it within CAV’s jurisdiction?
- Have the parties already attempted to resolve the matter themselves?
- Has the consumer/tenant already initiated a claim in another institution?
- Is the business/landlord willing to participate/cooperate in the conciliation?
VCAT
Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal
- received <80 000 claims 2024
VCAT jurisdiction
- Residential tenancies division
- Administrative convenience
- Civil division
- Human rights division
- Planning & environment division
Can’t hear- personal injury, family law, defamation etc
VCAT purposes
Low cost
- Low application fees e.g. $70 for small claims
Accessible
- Various locations & less formal hearings
Efficient
- Timely resolution of disputes BUT challenged by Covid
Independant
- VCAT members unbiased & impartial
VCAT methods
- Mediation
- Compulsory Conference (conciliation)
- VCAT hearing
VCAT methods- Mediation
- Facilitated by VCAT member
- Conduced without prejudice (hearing conducted by diff member if resolution is not reached)
- Parties usually sign terms of settlement
VCAT methods- Compulsory Conferences
- Run like conciliation
- Used instead of mediation for more complex cases
- Same points as mediation
VCAT methods- VCAT hearing
- Run by VCAT member
- As little formality & technicality as possible but still need to apply procedural fairness
- Most hearings open to public
- Make binding decision called VCAT orders
- If parties don’t attend hearings the case can still be heard & have a decision reached
VCAT- appropriateness
- Is the dispute within VCAT’s jurisdiction?
- Is it more cost effective + faster than courts?
- Are parties seeking less formal or more formal resolution?
Courts- jurisdiction
Almost unlimited jurisdiction
- Civil courts jurisdiction based on the value of the claim rather than the type
- All apart from where VCAT has exclusive jurisdiction
Courts- purposes
- To provide a closely supervised & managed formal dispute resolution
- To have a case resolved through a binding decision of an independent judicial officer
- To offer a wide jurisdiction in resolving all types of civil disputes
Courts- methods
Judicial mediation
- Held with a judge in a courtroom
Arbitration
- The Mag Court for disputes >$10 000
- Only with the parties consent
Mediation/Conciliation
- All court can refer parties w/o their consent
Judicial determination
- Final hearing if dispute not resolved earlier
- Imposes legally binding decision
- Strict rules of evidence & procedure
- Generally open to public
Courts- appropriateness
Whether the dispute falls within the courts jurisdiction?
Whether there is another or better way to resolve disputes? Consider…
- Costs
- High formality of courts
- Need for legal rep, -
- Privacy/confidentiality
- Time delays
- Desire for flexibility + compromise + control