Legitimate Expectations Flashcards

1
Q

What is a legitimate expectation?

A

can be procedural or substantive
Refers to a situation, where a public body has made a representation- 1.promise/ 2.past practice/ 3.-policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What do the courts demand?

A

the public body to stick to its word- only applies if there is no other statutory obligations
could be referred as ‘substantially unfair’- ex parte Begbie 2000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Features of a legitimate expectation

A

Ahmed and Perry 2018- non-legal obligation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why does the law protect legitimate expectations?- fairness/abuse of power/good administration + case law

A
  1. Fairness- Nadarajah 2005
  2. Stopping abuses of power- Niazi 2008/Endicott 2020
  3. Promoting Good Administration- Nadarajah 2005
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the 3 key questions in a leg. Expectation claim?- generated/lawful to depart from promise/ remedy

A
  1. Has a legitimate expectation been generated?- policy/promise- clear, unequivocal/ devoid of relevant qualification; past practice- well-established and unambiguous- tantamount to a promise
    2.Is it lawful for the public body to resile from its promise?- so unfair as to an abuse of power
    3.- What remedy should the claimant receive- get what they were promised
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Examples that don’t fit the legitimate expectation criteria- clear, unequivocal and devoid of relevant qualification

A

R(Davies) 2011- guidance on reduction of tax, when overseas- NOT A LEG. EXP.
Ex parte Hammersmith and Fulham 1991- sensible budgets- not firm enough to generate a LEG. EXP.
Bancoult No 2 2009- no firm promise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Examples of successful legitimate expectation claims- policy/promise

A

Ex parte Khan 1984- criteria for adoption, certain requirements were not in the policy, so as far as claimant was made aware he had a LEG. EXP.
Coughlan 2001- ‘home for life’- severe circumstances involved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Examples of successful LEG. EXP. claims- past practice

A

R(MP)- tantamount to a promise
Takes into consideration duration and regularity of practice- ex parte Vardy 1974

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When is resiling from a promise found unlawful?

A

Coughlan- so unfair as to be an abuse of power
Finucane- macro-political- matters of national security
Economic Interests- would lead country to bankruptcy- United Policy Holders 2016

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Contrast procedural and substantive LEG.EXP- main differences

A

Procedural- far more likely to be upheld- less controversial- Bhatt Murphy 2008
Substantive- claimants rarely succeed- separation of powers issue may be raised- Coughlan- high water mark
Rejected- Ex parte Begbie- as it had far-reaching effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When is resiling an ‘abuse of power’?

A

CONTEXT IS EVERYTHING
SS Education 2020- not consulting Children’s Commissioner on changes- ABUSE OF POWER
Coughlan- Detrimental reliance and also number of people affected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is not detrimental reliance? Contrast with Coughlan

A

Nadarajah case - claimant didn’t make themselves aware of Home Office Policy for Kurdish applicants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly