Lesson 11 Flashcards

Neutrality (37 cards)

1
Q

What is the main legal question about neutrality in the Ukraine war?

A

Whether neutral states are legally required to refrain from helping Ukraine, including by sending weapons.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the two main binding sources of the law of neutrality?

A

Hague Convention V (land war)
Hague Convention XIII (naval war)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What non-binding documents also address neutrality?

A

1923 Hague Rules of Air Warfare

1994 San Remo Manual

2009 Manual on Air and Missile Warfare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Does customary neutrality law exist?

A

It’s debated, but the inclusion of neutrality in many military manuals shows it is generally accepted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When does neutrality law apply?

A

During international armed conflicts (IACs) — any use of force by one state against another triggers it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When did the Ukraine–Russia conflict become an IAC?

A

In 2014 with Crimea’s annexation, and clearly by February 23/24, 2022, with Russia’s full invasion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What can neutral states NOT do during an IAC?

A

Allow their land to be used for military operations

Send warships, weapons, or war material (Convention XIII)

Send weapons (Convention V is vague, but implies prohibition)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does Article 7 of Convention V say?

A

It refers to private actors exporting arms and says neutral states are not obliged to stop them — but it doesn’t give states the right to send arms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does Article 6 of Convention XIII explicitly forbid?

A

Neutral states from supplying warships, ammunition, or any war materials to belligerents — directly or indirectly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is “qualified neutrality”?

A

The idea that neutral states can support the victim of aggression without violating neutrality laws.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why is qualified neutrality controversial?

A

It breaks impartiality and lets states decide who the aggressor is, which may escalate conflicts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the normal condition for applying qualified neutrality?

A

Only if the UN Security Council officially names an aggressor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why is Ukraine considered a special case for qualified neutrality?

A

Russia blocked the UN with its veto

Russia’s aggression is clear and illegal

Most states condemned Russia’s actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

According to the author, is sending weapons to Ukraine illegal?

A

No — in this exceptional case, helping Ukraine is not a violation of neutrality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did the 1907 Hague Neutrality Convention say about selling weapons?

A

Neutral countries didn’t have to stop their citizens from selling weapons to warring nations, but if they made rules, those had to apply equally to all sides.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What important issues did the 1907 neutrality rules fail to address?

A

They didn’t cover money, trade, or moral concerns—citizens could profit from war, governments didn’t have to check sources of money or gold, and they weren’t required to help people fleeing war.

17
Q

How did World War II and the Holocaust change the way people viewed neutrality?

A

Genocide by the Nazi regime showed that being neutral during such crimes was wrong. As one ambassador said, “Neutrality in the face of genocide is unacceptable.”

18
Q

How did countries reflect on their neutrality after World War II?

A

Argentina and Sweden investigated their trade with Nazi Germany, and Switzerland examined its purchase of potentially stolen gold to understand their wartime actions.

19
Q

What moral questions are now being asked about neutrality?

A

Should neutrality mean only not fighting, or also avoiding trade and support that might help a side committing genocide? Some believe international law should include moral responsibilities too.

20
Q

Why might the old idea of neutrality no longer work today?

A

Modern wars often harm civilians, and staying neutral could mean ignoring or even supporting wrongdoing. A new kind of neutrality may be needed—one that includes moral judgment.

21
Q

What was the main focus of the Hague Neutrality Convention of 1907?

A

It focused on military neutrality, saying that neutral countries didn’t have to stop their citizens from exporting war materials, but had to treat all warring sides equally if they made any restrictions.

22
Q

What economic aspect did the 1907 Convention fail to consider?

A

Private profit from war trade and ties between government and industry.

23
Q

What moral issues were left out of the 1907 Convention?

A

Refugee protection and checking sources of money or assets.

24
Q

How did WWII and the Holocaust change views on neutrality?

A

They showed neutrality in the face of genocide is morally wrong

25
What did some countries do after WWII?
Investigated their wartime trade and financial roles with Nazi Germany.
26
What key question did the symposium ask about neutrality?
Does neutrality also mean avoiding indirect support to war crimes?
27
What did the symposium explore about international law?
Whether it should include moral duties against aiding genocide.
28
Why might old neutrality rules not work today?
Modern wars target civilians, and silence can aid wrongdoing.
29
How is international law described in the text?
As the basic shared morality between nations.
30
What was the goal of the neutrality conference?
To spark discussion on neutrality and moral responsibility.
31
How has the U.S. approached neutrality historically?
The U.S. has claimed neutrality but often acted non-neutrally, especially in major conflicts.
32
How has the U.S. approached neutrality historically?
The U.S. has claimed neutrality but often acted non-neutrally, especially in major conflicts.
33
How did the UN change the legal status of neutrality?
Under Chapter VII, the UN can require actions that override traditional neutrality, like sanctions.
34
35
Strict vs. Qualified Neutrality
Strict Neutrality Based on 1907 Hague Conventions. A neutral state must not assist any belligerent with war materials, ships, or military aid. Emphasizes full abstention from the conflict. Qualified Neutrality Allows a state to support a victim of aggression, especially under the UN’s collective security principle. Does not imply becoming a party to the conflict. Rooted in modern understandings of collective self-defense (UN Charter, Article 51).
36
What’s the Black Sea Grain Deal?
The Black Sea Grain Deal (signed July 2022) was an agreement between Russia, Ukraine, Turkey, and the UN to ensure safe export of Ukrainian grain via the Black Sea, especially during the ongoing war
37