Level 3 Exam Flashcards
(131 cards)
What constitutes an Excellent score on the section of the test entitled “Testing: Review of BMS (pre-session) from current session”?
- The therapist displays and interested, warm, open demeanor when asking about BMS
- Reviews specific scores from each symptom section in meaningful way.
- Asks questions about scores/invites patient to discuss symptoms further
What constitutes an Excellent score on the section of the test entitled “Testing: Review of BMS and Evaluation of Therapy form from previous session”?
- The therapist comments on any pre-post symptom changes on last-session’s BMS
- Comments in an interested/non-defensive manner on Evaluation of Therapy Form
- Invites the patient to discuss symptoms changes and/or Evaluation of Therapy Form
- Shows genuine interest in connecting with patient about this information
What constitutes an Excellent score on the section of the test entitled “Empathy: 5 SECRETS OF EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION w/ ANGRY PT”?
- Successful use of each of the 5 secrets: TE/FE, DA, ST, IF, IN
- Appears comfortable with difficult or sensitive topics
- Puts the patient at ease with use of 5 secrets
What constitutes an Excellent score on the section of the test entitled “Empathy: 5 SECRETS OF EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION WHEN PT IS PRESENTING PROBLEM AND WHENEVER NECESSARY DURING SESSION”?
a) Successful use of many of the 5 secrets when patient is presenting problem
b) Appears comfortable offering extra empathy when needed/does not rush patient
c) Puts the patient at ease with use of empathy d) Overall excellent listening and reflection skills (TE/FE/DA)
What constitutes an Excellent score on the section of the test entitled “Agenda Setting: Invitation”?
a) Offers invitation to begin working on problem(s) while sitting with open hands and clearly open to continued empathy only.
b) Moves smoothly to empathy when patient exhibits resistance to agenda setting or to specificity when invitation is accepted.
What constitutes an Excellent score on the section of the test entitled “Agenda Setting: Specificity and Conceptualization”?
a) Therapist asks pt to describe a specific moment in time/place when s/he was struggling with specified problem.
b) Clear explanation of need for specificity is provided.
c) Conceptualization is clear and logical, helpful in guiding treatment
What constitutes and Excellent score on the section of the test entitled “Empathy: Assessing/Addressing Outcome Resistance”?
a) Mastery level of paradoxical magic button and magic dial questions used.
b) Clear paradoxical presentation and discussion of outcome resistance following presentation of magic button and before use of magic dial.
What constitutes and Excellent score on the section of the test entitled”Methods: Choice of Methods (Use of Recovery Circle/Intro to Failing as Fast as we Can)?
a) Generates 15+ appropriate techniques on a Recovery Circle (with minimal or no reliance on the List of 50 Techniques).
b) Demonstrates clear explanation of the purpose of the Recovery Circle to client.
c) Chooses methods squarely applicable to specific problem.
d) Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of all methods chosen.
What constitutes and Excellent score on the section of the test entitled”Methods: Presentation and Demonstration of A Few Methods - First Method Chosen by Examinee?
a) Thorough ability to explain the purpose of the method.
b) Strong ability to execute the method.
c) Incorporates appropriate empathy and connection.
d) Thoroughly integrates client learning at the end of the method.
What constitutes and Excellent score on the section of the test entitled”Methods: Presentation and Demonstration of A Few Methods - Second Method Chosen by Examiner?
a) Thorough ability to explain the purpose of the method.
b) Strong ability to execute the method.
c) Incorporates appropriate empathy and connection.
d) Thoroughly integrates client learning at the end of the method.
What is the setup for the Feared Fantasy Technique?
- Like the Externalization of Voices, this is a two-person technique. You and the other person act out your worst fears, such as being rejected because you aren’t smart enough or good enough. When you face your worst fear, you often gain liberation from it.
- Your worst fears usually don’t turn out to be real monsters, but figments of your imagination that can be defeated with a little logic, compassion, and common sense.
- It is a form of cognitive interpersonal exposure, and designed for interpersonal situations that someone is not likely to confront in reality.
- Patient are invited to enter into a Twilight-Zone world where their worst fears actually spring to life.
- In this world, if you think people are looking down at you, they really are - their thoughts about you are even worse than you would imagine
- People in this world also tell you what they are thinking, no matter how cruel or brutal it may sound.
- One person plays a “character from hell,” some judgmental or critical person the patient is afraid of who tries to rip the other to shreds based on their worst fears.
- The other plays the role of the client.
- After a while ask the client: Who’s being the bigger jerk here?
- Once the patient gets it, you can do a role-reversal, so she or he can do battle with the monster. This will convert intellectual understanding into real change at the gut level.
- In the end, make sure that any insights or positive thoughts it generates are written down in the Daily Mood Log.
What is the rationale and setup for the Acceptance Paradox?
- The Acceptance Paradox represents the spiritual core of CBT. It can lead to emotional enlightenment, but it’s the most difficult technique for patients and therapists alike to comprehend.
- When you use the Acceptance Paradox, you surrender to your own inner critic.
- It is similar to the Disarming Technique in the Five Secrets
- The Acceptance Paradox is an exception to the rule of moving on to the next technique if this doesn’t work.. If the patient doesn’t see it, you can continue to model it, using frequent role-reversals.
- It can be done in a role-play format like Externalization of Voices, with the emphasis being on the Acceptance Paradigm as opposed to the Self-Defense Paradigm.
- As always, any positive thoughts that are generated can be put back in the Daily Mood Log.
What is the rationale and setup for the Individual Downward Arrow Technique?
- The Individual Downward Arrow helps patients pinpoint Individual SDBs.
- You ask the patient to select a negative thought on his or her Daily Mood Log and draw a downward arrow underneath it.
- The arrow is a form of shorthand for this type of question: “If this were true, why would it be upsetting to you? What would it mean to you?”
- These questions will trigger a new negative thought that the patient can record directly under the arrow.
- Then you repeat the questions, and the patient will come up with another negative thought.
- Once you’ve done this several times, you can review the list of negative thoughts the patient generated. It will usually
be easy to identify the SDBs at the core of the patient’s suffering. - It is no so much of a method as it is a data-gathering technique.
- You’ve usually completed the Downward Arrow chain when you encounter a thought like one of these: a) That would mean I was worthless; b) That would mean life was not worth livi;ng; and c) Then I could never feel happy again.
- Keep a copy of this Self-Defeating Beliefs List, and hand it to the patient at this point. Patients are usually intrigued by
what we come up with. - Once you’ve identified an SDB, it can be helpful to do an Attitude Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA).
What do I say in Straightforward Agenda Setting?
I would say something like this: “John, you’ve mentioned a number of very difficult problems that you have been struggling with, including X, Y, and Z. I’d like to offer you more than just listening and support, as important as that is. I have a number of powerful tools that I believe could help you tremendously. As such, I’m wondering if this would be a good time for us to roll up our sleeves and get to work on one of the problems you’ve described, or if you need more time to talk and have me listen. Listening is important, and I don’t want to jump in prematurely, before you feel ready.”
What do I say when I’m doing Paradoxical Agenda Setting?
“Mary, you’ve been telling me how frustrated you feel with _________. You’ve mentioned how difficult he /she is to deal with, and so forth. I’m wondering if you want some help with your relationship with this person, or if you mainly just wanted to let me know how difficult and annoying he or she is.”
What are the Truth-Based Techniques?
They are:
a) Examine the Evidence
b) Experimental Technique
c) Survey Method
d) Reattribution
What are the Logic-Based Techniques?
They are:
a) Socratic Method
b) Thinking in Shades of Gray
c) Process vs. Outcome
What are the Semantic Techniques?
These are;
1) Semantic Method
2) Let’s Define Terms;
3) Be Specific
What is Empathy, and why is it important?
When we’re upset, you need someone to listen and see the world through your eyes without trying to cheer us up, change us, help us, or give us advice. Although this usually won’t cure us, it’s often a necessary first step. It can be a tremendous relief to feel that someone’s listening.Similarly, we can empathize when you’re trying to help a friend or family member who feels upset. Usually, all they really want is for us to be a good listener.
What is Agenda Setting, and what is its purpose?
Agenda Setting is the most basic and important technique of all. First, try to define a specific problem you want help with. It must be specific as to person, place, and time.
Ask yourself, “What is the specific problem I want help with? What time of day did it happen? Where was I? Who was I interacting with? What was going on?”
Second, ask yourself if you’re motivated and willing to roll up your sleeves and work on it now, rather than just talking about it endlessly. Ask yourself, “What would it be worth to me to solve this problem? How hard would I be willing to work on the solution?”
What is the Straightforward Technique?
You try to substitute a more positive and realistic thought for each of your Negative Thoughts. Ask yourself, “Is this Negative Thought really true? Do I really believe it? Is there another way to look at the situation?”
What is the Experimental Technique?
You do an experiment to test the validity of your Negative Thought, in much the same way that a scientist would test a theory. Ask yourself, “How could I test this Negative Thought to find out if it’s really valid?”
What is the Survey Technique?
You do a survey to find out if your thoughts are realistic. Ask yourself, “How do other people think and feel about this? Could I ask some friends about this to get some feedback?” For example, if you believe that social anxiety is rare or shameful, simply ask several friends if they’ve ever felt that way.
What is Reattribution?
Instead of blaming yourself entirely for a problem, you can think about the many factors that contributed to it. You can also focus on solving the problem instead of blaming yourself for it. Ask yourself, “What caused this problem? What did I contribute and what did others contribute? What can I learn from the situation?”