Life Assurance Products Flashcards
(152 cards)
How do with profits plans work?
The earliest such investments were with-profits plans. Investment performance is smoothed out by actuaries. Each year a proportion of the investment return is given as a bonus. Once added, this annual or reversionary bonus cannot be taken away. The remainder of the return achieved is kept in reserve to pay bonuses in later years when returns may not be as high. When a claim is made before a bonus becomes payable an interim bonus may be paid.
How do MVR / MVA’s work?
Assume that the accumulated value of your investment is £107,000 made up of £70,000 investment and £37,000 of bonuses. These bonuses are guaranteed and will be paid to
you on a pre-set maturity date or on certain surrender points. If markets fall in value, the underlying assets that back this might not be worth as much as £107,000.
As long as surrender at full value only takes place on the pre-set or pre-agreed dates, this cash flow situation can be managed by the fund manager. However, if people seek to encash their investment simply because markets have fallen, this can lead to a run on the fund and leave those who remain in the fund worse off because a disproportionate percentage of the fund wealth has been taken by those who have gone. This is where an MVA/MVR
will be applied so that those leaving other than on the agreed points will have their values reduced to reflect the value of the underlying assets to which they are entitled.
How do with-profits funds work?
The earliest such investments were with-profits plans. Investment performance is smoothed out by actuaries. Each year a proportion of the investment return is given as a bonus. Once added, this annual or reversionary bonus cannot be taken away. The remainder of the return achieved
is kept in reserve to pay bonuses in later years when returns may not be as high. When a claim is made before a bonus
becomes payable an interim bonus may be paid.
What were traditional with profits contracts based on
Traditional with profits contracts were based on a guaranteed sum assured which then had bonuses added to it. Most modern contracts are now unitised – the policyholder has units in a with-profits fund and when bonuses are added either the unit price is increased (variable priced unitised with profits) or more units are added (fixed price unitised with profits).
What are some disadvantages of with profit funds?
Whilst with profits contracts offer smoothing which reduces volatility (and so risk) over the long term performance may
be lower than an equivalent unit linked fund since the actuaries have to keep back reserves rather than passing them straight on to the investor. They are also criticised for lack of transparency.
how we can measure whether a with profit fund is profitable
This opaque nature of with-profits investments means that the best measure of whether an investment is likely to be
profitable or not is the success of the life company itself. This can be gauged by assessing its assets against its liabilities – in other words, measuring the Free Asset Ratio
(FAR). The FAR along with fund performance and the asset allocation should be evaluated carefully before an investment is made.
can money be moved within a life insurance product without constituting a disposal?
Some life contracts will also allow for investment in the funds of external fund managers. One of the big positives of
life assurance investments is that money can be moved from fund to fund within the wrapper, without constituting a disposal and without triggering a tax liability.
what is one of the biggest problems with unit linked investments?
One of the big problems with unit linked investments is that the point at which you invest can be critical in the overall
return. As the unit price varies daily, investing on the wrong day can have a significant impact on returns. To counter
this, many people will invest over a period of months, drip feeding money into the fund and benefitting from ‘poundcost averaging’. This basically means that when unit prices are low, you buy more for your money, when prices are high you get less but over the period of, say, 12 months the
average price is achieved
what are the two most common regular premium plans?
Regular premium plans are generally either whole of life (will run until the death of the life assured or earlier surrender) or endowment (set for a specified term or until the earlier death of the life assured).
How are charges typically levied on regular premium life insurance contracts?
Charges are now typically levied
for the life assurance element of the contract and an annual management charge as well as a bid-offer spread. Older contracts often also have more punitive charges such as ‘initial units’ under which a higher annual management charge applies or a reduced allocation rate whereby only,
say, 95% of each premium is used to buy units.
What are the main rules regarding regular premium contracts
These rules are broadly that the contract must be a regular premium and that premiums must be payable for at least 10
years or ¾ term if this is shorter. Premiums in any one year cannot be more than twice the premiums in any other year nor more than 1/8 of the total premiums due over the term of the contract.
What is the contribution limit on qualifying policies?
Given the tax benefits associated with this qualifying status, such policies started to look like a good alternative to pensions
for those who were exceeding the ‘annual allowance’. To prevent this, the government introduced a limit of £3,600 per annum, per person on the contributions to qualifying policies. Where this is exceeded, the policy will lose its status and will be taxed under the harsher non-qualifying rules covered below.
What is a guaranteed income bond?
guarantee to pay out a certain level of income over a certain period with return of
capital on maturity. This type of contract is generally issued in ‘tranches’ by insurers with each tranche being for a certain
overall investment. Once it is fully subscribed, the tranche comes to an end. This is often to limit the capital exposure of
the insurer.
What is a guaranteed growth bond?
the same as guaranteed income bond, but with the guarantee being a set capital return
at maturity rather than an income.
What are distribution bonds?
unlike ordinary unit linked funds,
these separate out income and capital allowing for the income return to be paid out to the investor annually and capital return retained in the fund. No unit encashments are required to
produce the income.
What are Guaranteed / protected equity bonds / high income bonds
these are essentially a combination of a
high interest deposit and derivatives. A sufficient percentage of each investment is put into a high interest cash product such that at the end of the term, the capital
will be returned. The remainder is used to buy a derivative contract which secures a percentage of the rise in an index
such as the FTSE100. These are not very common at the moment since interest rates are very low, meaning that more of the money has to be kept in cash and less is
available to buy the derivative contract
What is the tax situation within a onshore (UK) life contracts
Both qualifying and non-qualifying
UK policies hold investments in UK life funds. These funds will be managed by a fund manager who will be liable to corporation tax on income and capital gains.
Dividends (UK and Overseas) are tax free, other income is taxed at 20%. Gains are also taxed at 20% (with gains on gilts and corporate bonds being exempt).
Expenses of the fund can be offset against unfranked income so if expenses are greater than income then there could be no tax to pay which in turn could mean higher
returns for investors!
Importantly, there is no ability for a non-taxpayer to reclaim this whether the policy is qualifying or non-qualifying. This
means that non-taxpayers are the least likely to benefit from investment in this type of contract
What is the tax situation on an investor investing in a qualifying policy?
An investor holding a qualifying policy, provided the qualifying rules are met, will be able to receive the benefits from the policy free of any further taxation at maturity - the tax paid by the fund manager is deemed to be sufficient.
There are, however, disadvantages such as the need to maintain premiums and the charges associated with the policy, including a minimum level of life assurance
necessary to maintain the tax treatment of the policy (for example, 75% of the premiums payable over the contract term or to age 75 for a qualifying endowment – (note: most policies are set up for a minimum of 10 years and must run
for a minimum of 75% of that to remain qualifying), so they aren’t for everyone. In addition, the £3,600 limit on contributions to such policies has significantly reduced the
attraction of their use for many.
How are non qualifying policies taxed on the investor?
Non-qualifying policies work similarly in some ways but very differently in others! Just as qualifying policies, the fund
manager pays corporation tax on income and gains and this is deemed to be sufficient to satisfy a basic rate liability (20%). Again, non-taxpayers cannot reclaim
tax paid, but unlike qualifying policies, there is a further
liability to tax for higher and additional rate taxpayers.
you should note that where a non qualifying policy has joint owners, any gain and subsequent tax liability will be spread equally across them.
How are partial withdrawals taxed on non qualifying policies?
This is done at the end of every policy year by adding all the withdrawals together.
Income tax is assessed in the tax year that the anniversary of the policy falls into.
5% of the original investment can be withdrawn without any tax liability on withdrawal.
The 5% is cumulative so if you don’t use it or don’t use all of it, the balance can be carried forward to the next year.
If the total withdrawals in the policy year are within the cumulative 5% then there is no chargeable event and no chargeable gain and therefore no tax to pay at that
time. If they exceed the cumulative 5% then a chargeable event occurs.
The chargeable gain on this chargeable event is the excess over the cumulative 5%.
It does not matter of the performance of the bond, however HMRC have said they will allow investors to apply to have the gain recalculated to account for it being disproportionate which incidentally in the end is HMRC’s decision
is the 5% return of capital rule cumulative?
the 5% allowance is cumulative. If it is missed in year one, up to 10% can be taken in year two. Secondly, it is based on full or part years, so where someone has had a bond for 2 years and 3 months and has made no previous withdrawals, they would be allowed to take up to 15%. Finally, it is
important to remember that the 5% is based on the original investment NOT the current value
Jim has a bond. He originally invested £100,000 into it and he has held it for 5 years and 7 months.
If he has made no previous withdrawals, how much can he take without there being an immediate charge to income tax?
He has held it for 5 full years and one partyear so this means that we round up to 6 years. He can take 5% of the original investment (£5000) for each of these years,
so he can take up to £30,000 this year.
work out this example:
Mary has a bond into which she invests £100,000. In year one she makes no withdrawal but in year two she
withdraws £17,000. She surrenders it after 5 years having made no further withdrawals for a value of £120,000.
The £17,000 withdrawal will be partly taxable. Her allowance is 2 x £5000 and so she will be taxed on £7000 at the time.
Assuming she is a basic rate taxpayer she will actually escape further tax, if she is higher or additional rate she will pay an
extra 20/25%. When she later surrenders the bond, she receives £120,000. To this we add the £10,000 deferred element from her withdrawal to give £130,000 and deduct her
original investment of £100,000. This gives her a £30,000 chargeable gain which may be subject to tax depending on her tax status. The £7000 that has already been taxed is not brought back into the equation – this has been dealt with. She may be able to use her personal savings allowance and then top slicing may be used to establish what further tax may be due.
If £100,000 was invested, in flat markets, 3 years later £30,000 withdrawn when the investment was still worth £100,000
What are the tax consequences when surrender one segment for the £30,000
single segment – cumulative 5% allowance
would be £15,000 (£5000 x 3 years), actual withdrawal £30,000 – chargeable gain £15,000. For a higher rate taxpayer assuming this was an onshore bond, there would be a tax charge of £15,000 x 20% or £3000 even though the bond has actually made no gain.