List of Fallacies Flashcards

1
Q

Dogmatism

A

Insisting one’s beliefs are unquestionably correct, ignoring evidence or counterarguments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Invincible Ignorance

A

Refusing to accept compelling contrary evidence or arguments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Wishful Thinking

A

Believing something because one desires it to be true, disregarding evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Cherry-Picking Evidence

A

Selecting only evidence that supports one’s argument while ignoring contradictory evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Appeal to Consequences

A

Judging an argument’s validity based on the desirability of its conclusions, rather than evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Confirmation Bias

A

Seeking and favoring information that confirms existing beliefs, ignoring or dismissing contradictory evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Equivocation

A

Using a word or phrase with multiple meanings inconsistently within the same argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ambiguity

A

Statements that have multiple valid interpretations, making the intended meaning unclear.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Vagueness

A

Lack of specificity or precision, making the exact meaning uncertain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Argument from Ignorance

A

Claiming something is true because it hasn’t been proven false (or vice versa).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Shifting the Burden of Proof

A

Forcing others to disprove one’s claim rather than providing evidence oneself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Special Pleading

A

Exempting one’s claim from the burden of proof without justification.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Straw Man Fallacy

A

Misrepresenting or exaggerating an opponent’s argument to easily refute it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Misquoting Out of Context

A

Distorting meaning by isolating statements from their intended context.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

False Dichotomy

A

Reducing complex issues to only two extreme options, ignoring nuanced perspectives.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Circular Reasoning (Begging the Question)

A

Assuming the conclusion within premises, offering no independent evidence.

17
Q

Contradictory Premises

A

Using premises that logically conflict with each other.

18
Q

Denying the Antecedent

A

Incorrectly assuming the falsity of an antecedent condition disproves the consequent result.

19
Q

Red Herring

A

Introducing unrelated points to distract from the main issue.

20
Q

Ad Hominem

A

Attacking the person rather than addressing their argument.

21
Q

Genetic Fallacy

A

Evaluating an argument based solely on its origin rather than its evidence or merit.

22
Q

Appeal to Questionable Authority

A

Using the testimony of an unqualified or irrelevant source as evidence.

23
Q

Slippery Slope

A

Assuming a minor action will inevitably lead to extreme consequences without sufficient evidence.

24
Q

False Dilemma

A

Presenting an issue as having only two extreme options, ignoring viable alternatives.

25
Hasty Generalization
Drawing broad conclusions from insufficient or unrepresentative evidence.
26
Anecdotal Evidence
Relying primarily on personal stories or isolated incidents as proof.
27
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Assuming one event caused another simply because it occurred first.
28
Ignoring Counterevidence
Disregarding opposing evidence or arguments.
29
Poisoning the Well
Preemptively discrediting the opponent rather than addressing their argument.
30
No True Scotsman
Arbitrarily redefining criteria to dismiss counterexamples.
31
Appeal to Ignorance
Assuming a claim is true (or false) simply because it hasn’t been proven otherwise.
32
False Compromise
Assuming the truth always lies between two opposing views.
33
Argument to Moderation
Assuming a moderate position is inherently correct without considering the evidence.
34
Moving the Goalposts
Arbitrarily changing the resolution criteria after they’ve been met.
35
Ignoring Resolution Criteria
Refusing to acknowledge agreed-upon criteria even when they’ve been satisfied.