Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

Exam 6U > Lists > Flashcards

Lists Flashcards

1
Q

Methods for selecting discount rate (3)

A

Risk-free rate
Portfolio yield
Selection by another party (must disclose)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Discounting disclosures (5)

A

Dates (accounting, valuation, review)
Data, Assumptions, Methods
Uncertainties around payment pattern
Difference between discounted & undiscounted reserves
Range (& basis)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

ASOP 41 Communications (8) (CRISIS-LQ)

A

Conflicts of interest
Risks
Intended user
Scope
Information used the actuary cannot take credit for
Subsequent events
Limitations on applicable findings
Qualifications of actuary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

ASOP 43 Unpaid Claim Estimate Identifications (5)

A

Claims covered (LOB, state, etc)
Reinsurance (net/gross, uncollectability risk)
Expenses (types of LAE, unpaid)
Discounting (if done and relevant disclosures)
RMAD: sources of risk, significant events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

ASOP 43 Unpaid Claim Estimate Method Selection (4) (PaNDA)

A

Purpose of analysis (internal/external)
Nature of claims
Data availability
Assumptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Considerations for setting materiality level (6) (F-STARS)

A

Financial strength
Size of entity
Type of business
Access to capital
Retention (net)
Stage of org’s life cycle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

General considerations around disclosures (3)

A

Sophistication of user
Importance of concept to user
Complexity of concept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Tests for RMAD (6)

A

Bright Line Indicator
10% of net L+LAE > TAC - CAL
If materiality standard falls within range
Long-tailed or volatile lines
Cats late in the year
Excess claims not reported to reinsurer until retention is breached

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Reasons for nuclear verdicts (6)

A

Plaintiff profile (young, seriously injured, high income)
“Reptile tactics” used by plaintiff counsel to appeal to highest possible safety standards
Stealth jurors (hide bias)
State court
Defendant’s actions are egregious
Defense attorneys prioritize perfect record for appeal over convincing jury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Impacts of nuclear verdicts (5)

A

Bankruptcy
Increased cost of insurance
Decreased availability of insurance
Decreased innovation and product development
Shadow effect: larger pre-trial settlements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Defense against nuclear verdicts (5)

A

Pre-Trial:
Defense uses supplemental questionnaire to identify stealth jurors
Defendant offers to confess
During Trial:
Comparative fault defense (pro-rated compensation)
Limit “reptile tactic” questions
After trial:
Appeal verdict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

State and federal legislative activity around nuclear verdicts (5)

A

State Tort Reform
Caps on punitive damages
Unique state limits (KS, MS, MT base punitive caps on income or net worth of defendant)
Specialized rules (CT about product liability, RI about wrongful death)
Federal legislation: Stop Underrides Act (reduce accidents involving cars under trucks)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Self-supporting FHCF characteristics

A

Premiums calculated by actuarial methods
Assessment-backed bonds if cash balance insufficient
Engage in finance and risk-transfer activities to improve liquidity and minimize assessments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Operational responsibilities of FHCF (5)

A

Maintain Staff: admin, finance, audit prep, claims examiners, debt financing, legal
Manage in-house operations
Oversee outside service providers
Rely on State Board Admin for investment and IT
FHCF Advisory Council provides advice on implementation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Strengths of Schedule F for Solvency Monitoring (3)

A

Reinsurance Provision (RP) is formulaic and easy to compare across companies and years while being hard to manipulate
RP accounts for reinsurer credit risk by penalizing unauthorized/foreign reinsurers or slow-paying reinsurers
SchF shows impact to surplus of reins

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Weaknesses of Schedule F for Solvency Monitoring (5)

A

Reinsurance Provision (RP) is formulaic and masks actuarial insight with no statistical basis for its formula
Penalized unauthorized reinsurers and slow payers regardless of financial strength
Slow payment threshold is arbitrary
SchF only measures collectability, not overall solvency
Doesn’t measure quality of insurer’s reinsurance management

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What does a regulator consider for unauthorized reinsurers applying for certification? (5)

A

Jurisdiction
Rating (from agency)
Regulatory history
Financial position
Capital and surplus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Motivations for reins commutation

A

Solvency (both sides)
Exit a market or LOB
Disputes over contract provisions
Reserves - disagree over valuation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Methods for assessing existence of risk transfer (4)

A

Self-evident (qualitative)
If significant loss is not reasonably possible BUT a reinsurer assumes “Substantially All” of the risk then risk transfer may still exist (quota share, risky individual risk contracts) (qualitative)
Expected Reinsurer Deficit = prob(NPV reins loss)*(NPV reins loss)/(reins prem) if ERD > 1% then yes to risk transfer
10-10 rule: if reinsurer has >=10% chance of >=10% UW loss then yes to risk transfer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Balance sheet & income statement users (8)

A

Regulators
Actuary
Company management
Shareholders/investors
Auditors
Policyholder/insured
Board of Directors
Rating Agency
Competitors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Non-admitted assets (4)

A

Illiquid assets like furniture, electronics, etc.
Agent’s balances >90 days overdue
Deferred tax asset
Real estate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Components of Other Surplus Changes (6)

A

ADD
Change in unrealized capital gains
Change in unrealized foreign exchange
Change in deferred income tax
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles
SUBTRACT
Change in non-admitted assets
Change in provision for reinsurance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Causes of reinsurance uncollectibility

A

credit risk (inability to pay due to insolvency or impairment)
dispute risk (unwilling to pay)
differing interpretations of contract
unique exposures
rare events
provisions untested in courts
contract disputes
latent liabilities like asbestos or environmental pollution
missing policies
late notice of claim
settlements made without first consulting reinsurer
definition of “occurrence”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Functions of Reinsurance

A

Fronting arrangement
Catastrophe protection
Surplus relief & capital efficiency
Withdrawal from market
Internal reins transactions
Pools (mandatory and voluntary)
Large line capacity
Enter market and/or get UW guidance from more experienced reinsurer
Stabilize results

25
Structure of Insurance Regulation (D2P2M)
Duplication Diversity of perspective Peer review (NAIC FAD & FAWG) Peer pressure Market discipline
26
Business areas impacted by federal taxation
Pricing Valuation/reserving Constructing capital models Tax return preparation
27
Risk Retention Groups formation & Operation
Formation: must submit plan of operation to commissioner of domiciliary state Operation: may write business directly in registered states without obtaining a license Can do business in non-domiciled state if a registration process is completed and the state's ins commissioner is designated as agent for service of process Treated as multi-state insurers and subject to NAIC accreditation standards for RRGs File quarterly & annual yellow book financial statements, RBC, SAO, MD&A, and audited statements
28
Ineligibility for residual (auto) market
No valid drivers license Felony conviction within 36 months Habitual violation of the law
29
Benefits of predictive analytics
Reveal insight into insurance costs Encourage better risk management Lower many consumer costs
30
Casualty Actuarial and Statistical (C) task force responsibilities & purpose
Draft & propose changes to Product Filing Review Handbook Provide state guidance for rate filings based on predictive models Enhance uniformity in regulatory processes Consider state-specific insurance needs
31
Regulatory best practices - purpose & benefits
Support parameter valuation Improve model understanding Provide a baseline for state regulators Guide regulators Identify key model elements Facilitate resource sharing Improve review quality Aid in training Enhance market speed and competitiveness
32
Regulator review of predictive models
Model is cost-based, compliant with state law, and improves company's rating plan Data & model check: How it was built Accuracy of data input Adjustments to raw data Update frequency of risk characteristics Interaction of model with rating plan: Understand input characteristics of model Integration of model with rating plan Interaction with non-modeled variables Desired marketplace effects: Enable competition and innovation Protect model confidentiality Allow timely reviews for speed to market
33
Predictive model desirable characteristics
Produce fair rates Not cause excessive premium disruptions Comply with state practices
34
Components of Solvency Modernization Initiative
Capital requirements Governance and risk management Group supervision Statutory accounting Financial accounting Reinsurance
35
Judging regulatory effectiveness (RIICH)
Rehabilitation effects Identification of problems before policyholders harmed Insolvency frequency & guaranty fund effectiveness Cost-benefit analysis positive for regulation Healthy insurance market
36
Core principles of US insurance financial solvency (POORER-C)
Reporting Off-site exams On-site exams Capital adequacy Regulatory control of risky transactions Prevention & correction Exiting market
37
Reasons for Reins Regulatory Modernization Framework to be federal rather than state
Propose & improve state-based reins regulation Uniform implementation in all states Comprehensive alternative to related federal legislation that may be focused on other issues
38
Priorities for Solvency Modernization Initiative
Create a document explaining the US ins regulatory system Examine international developments Comply with ICPs promulgated by the IAIS (Int'l Ass of Ins Supervisors) Learn from global financial crisis
39
Surplus line regulation
Product must be unavailable in traditional insurance marketplace Producers must be licensed to sell surplus lines insurance Producers must place business with insurers that meet managerial and financial requirements
40
Causes of insurer insolvency
Governance - poor governance New entrant - management may be inexperienced or balance sheet may be low on capital Growth - too rapid to support future loss development Size - too small to absorb unexpected losses ALSO: - deficient reserves - under-pricing of risks
41
DOI regulatory intervention for trouble insurers
fact-finding: examine insurer using resources such as financial statements, RBC, IRIS, etc. select appropriate regulatory action: - mandatory corrective action - administrative supervision - receivership → rehabilitation - receivership → liquidation
42
Levels of scrutiny in regulation - by LOB
Low scrutiny: IM, Ocean Marine, Surety, Title, CGL - sophisticated buyers - individualized risks - thin data High scrutiny: WC and Private Passenger Auto - unsophisticated buyers - uniform rates - credible data - mandatory coverage - complex classification system - public interest & political awareness
43
Services provided by insurance advisory organizations
- education of the public, industry, & regulators - actuarial services - filing support - development of policy forms
44
Causes/warning signs of insolvencies
Poor governance New entrance to market Growing too rapidly Company too small to absorb unexpected losses Deficient reserves Underpricing Other: Catastrophe Reinsurer insolvency Asbestos Poor investment results
45
Lines of business excluded from state guaranty funds
Credit Surplus lines Title Ocean marine Reinsurance Mortgage Pension
46
Guaranty fund limitations
limited to certain lines of business claims payouts and UEP refund: - have stated limits deductibles: - claim deductible - policy deductible - large net worth deductible (a percentage of an insured's net worth) trigger is required: - court must verify insolvency and have placed insurer in receivership
47
Characteristics of "the business of insurance"
Specific to insurance Spreads risk (risk transfer) Contracts between insurer and insured None were satisfied in Royal Drug case
48
NAIC goals
fundamental goals: - promote public interest (fair & equitable treatment of consumers) - promote insurer solvency - promote state insurance regulation types of regulatory assistance: - Develop uniform financial reporting standards - Assist states with pricing/coverage - Maintain databases to track solvency
49
Features of state insurance regulatory system
requirements for insurers regarding: - licensing - reporting & filing authority to: - conduct periodic exams - impose sanctions
50
NAIC Accreditation Program for states
Goal: maintain standards for solvency regulation Interview personnel from state insurance department Review: - state laws - prior examination reports - files on selected state insurers - operations of state insurance department Understand communications within state insurance department Discuss & Report findings
51
State DOI functions
Licensing & regulation - licensing of insurers (for insurers doing business in their state) - licensing of producers (sellers may have to pass exams, pay licensing fees, perform continuing education) - regulation of rates & coverages (see below for 4 types of rate filings) - regulation of claims adjusters (market conduct exams may include claims adjusting & settlement practices) Insurer solvency - financial exams (includes financial statements, IRIS,.. - monitor sale of insurance securities (stocks, bonds, real estate, loans) - determine need for receivership (either rehabilitation or liquidation of an impaired insurer) Other services - fraud prevention (NAIC has an online fraud reporting system) - consumer services (education, complaint resolution)
52
Credit Scores: for & against
For: Statistical significance (correlated with frequency) Manipulation is difficult Objective - based on numerical data Removal of credit score rating won't impact aggregate premium if off-balance is applied Against: Frequency is the only correlation - not severity Errors are common (identity theft) Economic downturns have disparate effect on credit scores of vulnerable populations (recession hits credit score, not driving habits) Discriminatory - may violate actuarial rating goals
53
Rating Agencies
AM Best - most experience, comprehensive financial strength rating Moody's - debt rating S&P - debt rating All agencies use interactive rating but their exact methods and models differ
54
How to ensure consistency of financial strength rating across insurers
1. Standard information-gathering and assessment guidelines 2. ratings are related to economic capital 3. analysis and final rating should be issued by separate bodies
55
Interactive Rating methods
Research: by ratings analysts (insurer submits proprietary info) Meeting: between rating analysts & insurer's senior management for presentations Proposal: the rating analyst leader proposes a rating (insurer may submit further info) Decision: by ratings committee Publication: to public & fee-paying subscribers
56
If an insurer's financial strength has changed, what reporting options are available?
reporting options: [1] downgrade or upgrade insurer's rating [2] change the outlook (do not upgrade or downgrade) Note that rating agencies hesitate to change ratings too quickly: - to avoid angering paying clients (if their rating is downgraded) - to maintain consistency & reputation among users of financial ratings
57
NRRA provision
1-state compliance: insured's home state has exclusive authority to regulate nonadmitted insurance uniform eligibility standards: US-dom must have more than 15M capital & surplus and if alien insurer is listed in Quarterly Listing of Alien Insurers then states cannot prohibit their business ECPs or Exempt Commercial Purchasers: states cannot force a broker to do a diligent search if: - employs a NRRA-qualified risk manager - has paid aggregate commercial premiums ≥ $100,000 (in past 12 months) the person's company is "large" (high net worth ≥ ~20m or high revenues or lots of employees,..) - the broker has disclosed to the purchaser that coverage may be available in the admitted market - national producer database of licensure & renewal of surplus lines brokers: if a state doesn't participate in such a database then they can't collect licensing fees
58
Disclosures around price optimization rate filings
- rate adjustments that are not cost-based (may include judgmental adjustments) - whether price optimization was used (Ex: demand models) - which rating factors are affected by price optimization and their quantitative impact - whether customers with the same risk profile have different rates - data sources and models that affected the rate charged in any way

Exam 6U (13 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions