Loftus And Palmer Flashcards

(17 cards)

1
Q

What is the aim of Loftus and Palmer’s study?

A

To investigate how leading questions could influence eyewitness testimony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How many participants were in Experiment 1?

A

45 students, divided into 5 groups with 9 participants in each group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How many participants were in Experiment 2?

A

150 students, divided into 3 groups with 50 participants in each group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the research method used in L+P?

A

Lab experiments with independent measures design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the procedure of Experiment 1 in L+P?

A

— All ptps shown same 7 clips of traffic accidents
— After, ptps were given questionnaire where asked to describe the accident and answer questions
— Critical question asked: “how fast were the cars going when they hit each other?”
— Each group had a different verb: smashed, collided, contacted, bumped, hit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the IV and DV of Experiment 1 in L+P?

A

IV: the verbs

DV: the mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the controls used in Experiment 1 of L+P?

A
  1. Each groups saw films in different order
  2. Random allocation for groups
  3. All ptps received same questionnaire
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What were the results of Experiment 1 of L+P?

A
  1. Smashed: 40.8 mph
  2. Collided: 39 mph
  3. Bumped: 38 mph
  4. Hit: 34 mph
  5. Contacted: 31mph
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the conclusion of Experiment 1 of L+P?

A

The wording of the question did have an effect on the estimate of speed showing leading questions can influence response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the two explanations for the reasons for the differences in results from Experiment 1 in L+P?

A
  1. Response bias= ptp can’t tell mph or verb biased results towards one answer
  2. Change in memory= judgement of speed is based on verb
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why was Experiment 2 of L+P designed?

A

To see which explanation was correct, either response bias or change in memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the procedure of Experiment 2 of L+P?

A

— Each group shown a one minute film of car accident
— Questionnaire 1: asked on day of video
— Group 1: How fast were the cars going when they hit each other?
— Group 2: How fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other?
— Group 3: Control group, did not receive a question on speed

— Questionnaire 2: one week after viewing the video
— Groups given questionnaire of 10 questions, with one critical question:
— Did you see any broken glass?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the IV and the DV in Experiment 2 of L+P?

A

IV: the verb used

DV: mph + response to question on broken glass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What were the results of Experiment 2 in L+P?

A
  1. Smashed: 16 saw broken glass - average of 10 mph
  2. Hit: 7 saw broken glass - average 8 mph
  3. Control: 6 saw broken glass
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the conclusion of Experiment 2 in L+P?

A
  1. Wording of question influenced estimate of speed
  2. Results in Experiment 1 is not due to response bias (leading questions influence memory)
  3. Memory is reconstructive and affected by new info
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are schemas?

A

Organised mental representations of information

Eg. Situations, events, people and objects

17
Q

How do schemas affect memory?

A
  1. They guide the selection of what will be stored
  2. Only stores some information from an event
  3. New information may be distorted