Loftus and Palmer (1974) Flashcards

(30 cards)

1
Q

reconstructive memory definition

A

the way in which our biases and prejudices can unconsciously lead us to have memories of events that are distortions of what actually happened

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

leading questions definition

A

a question that by its form or content suggests to the witness what answer is desired or leads them to the desired answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

aim of loftus and palmer experiment

A

to investigate the effects of language on memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what research method used in the experiment and how do we know

A

laboratory experiment, the IV (critical question) was manipulated by the experimenter, and the study took place in a controlled environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

in what way was the data collected

A

through a questionnaire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

describe the sample in experiment one

A

45 student participants split into 5 groups of 9 from Washington USA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

name the 5 verbs used in the different conditions of experiment 1 (IV)

A

contacted, hit, bumped, collided, smashed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what was the dependent variable of experiment one

A

the mean speed estimate (in miles per hour)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe the procedure of experiment one

A
  • participants shown SEVEN film clips, given a questionnaire to complete after each clip
  • two parts of the questionnaire: give an account of the accident just seen, answer a set of questions related to the accident
    (researchers interested in critical question about the speed of the vehicle)
  • groups presented with a different order of films to prevent order effects ( exp lasted around 1 hour 30 min)
  • IV manipulated by changing the wording of the critical question with different verbs
    (critical question dependent variable, hidden by distracter questions)
  • question format ‘about how fast were the cars going when they —– each other?’
  • each subject received one of 5 questions in their questionnaire, theorised stronger verb equals higher speed estimate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is the mean speed estimate for the verb smashed

A

40.8mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the mean speed estimate for the verb collided

A

39.3mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the mean speed estimate for the verb bumped

A

38.1mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the mean speed estimate for the verb hit

A

34.0mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the mean speed estimate for the verb contacted

A

31.8mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

conclusions from experiment one

A

the form of the question affected the witnesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe interpretation 1 of experiment 1 explanation of results

A

(Response bias)
- the word in the critical question biases participants to give a different speed estimate

17
Q

Describe interpretation 2 of experiment 1 explanation of results

A

(Memory change)
The language used causes a change in the participants memory representation of events (the verb ‘smashed’ could mean the participants ‘see’ a more severe accident when trying to remember it)

18
Q

What experimental design was used in experiment 2 and why

A

Laboratory experiment, DV and IV controlled in a controlled environment

19
Q

Describe the sample in experiment 2

A
  • 150 student participants (divided into 3 groups of 50)
  • Washington USA
20
Q

Describe stage 1 of experiment 2

A
  • participants watch a less than a minute film showing a multiple car crash
  • asked to fill out 1/3 versions of a questionnaire (depending on the group)
21
Q

Describe stage 2 of experiment 2

A
  • participants asked 10 questions
  • contains critical question ‘did you see any broken glass?’
22
Q

What were the 3 conditions of the independent variable in experiment 2

A

50 participants asked
- ‘about how fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other?’
Or
- ‘about how fast were the cars going when they hit each other?’
Or
- not asked about speed of vehicles, control group

23
Q

What was the dependent variable of experiment 2

A

The number of participants from each condition of the experiment who said they remembered having seen broken glass in the video

24
Q

How many participants in the ‘smashed’ verb condition remembered seeing broken glass

25
How many participants in the ‘hit’ verb condition remembered seeing broken glass
7/50
26
How many participants in the control group remembered seeing broken glass
6/50
27
What were the conclusions of experiment 2
The verb used in a question can affect the speed a witness estimates at and whether they recall having seeing broken glass - the form of a question does affect a witnesses’ memory)
28
What two things make up our memory of a complex event
Our own perception- the event is what you think happened, based off your own memory External information- content given after the event (can be through police questions, media coverage etc.) -> hard to distinguish between the two when recalling a memory
29
In what ways is this study ethnocentric
Only students from America (upper middle class) were studied - could only reflect how university educated peoples cognitive processes work
30
In what ways is this study not ethnocentric
Reconstructive memory depends on the physiognomy of our brain, so it’s investigating species-species behaviour (cognitive processes are universal)