Logic and Proofing Flashcards

1
Q

The negation of p → q

A

p ⋀ ~q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

p → q ≡ ?

(Material Implication)

A

p → q ≡ ~ p ⋁ q

(Material Implication)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

~ (p → q) ≡ ?

A

~ (p → q) ≡ p ⋀ ~q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

p ↔ q ≡ ?

A

p ↔ q ≡ (p → q) ⋀ (q → p)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

p → q

What is:
Contrapositive, Converse, Inverse

A

Conditional 𝑝 → 𝑞
Contrapositive ∼ 𝑞 →∼ 𝑝
Converse 𝑞 → 𝑝
Inverse ∼ 𝑝 →∼ 𝑞

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Order of operations for logical statements?

A

First: ~
Equal second: ⋀ and ⋁, use parentheses to specify. If no parentheses given, work from left to right.
Equal third: → ← ↔ Use parentheses to specify. If no parentheses given, work from left to right.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does same parity imply?

A

if x & y have the same parity, they are both even or both odd.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

3 Methods for checking validity?

A
  1. Truth Table
  2. Rules of inference & Laws of Logical Equivalence
  3. Assuming the argument is invalid

Note: Rules of Inference only work for VALID arguments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Process for checking validity via ‘Assuming the argument is invalid’

A

Assume all premises are true and the conclusion is false.
If there are truth values that allow for this, then the argument is invalid.
However, if this leads to a contradiction, then the argument is valid.

Remember, we set the supposed conclusion to false first.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Negate:
m ∈ D, Q(m)

A

m ∈ D | ~Q(m)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Negate:
m ∈ D | ~Q(m)

A

m ∈ D, Q(m)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Negate:
m ∈ D | ∀n ∈ E, ~Q(m,n)

A

m ∈ D, ∃n ∈ E | Q(m,n)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Negate:
m ∈ D, ∃n ∈ E | Q(m,n)

A

m ∈ D | ∀n ∈ E, ~Q(m,n)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Method: Proof by Contradiction?

A
  1. Assume that the statement is false
  2. Show that this leads logically to a contradiction.
  3. Conclude the statement is true.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Contrapositive:
m ∈ D, P(m) → Q(m)

A

m ∈ D, ~Q(m) → ~P(m)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly