loss of control Flashcards

1
Q

r v dawes
FACTS

A

the defendant went to his house and found his wife asleep with another man and started to punch and hit him with a bottle. The man took the bottle off him and started to attack him. The defendant then got a kitchen knife and stabbed him in the neck

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

r v dawes
LEGAL PRINCIPLE

A

he couldnt rely on fear of violence where he incites that violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

r v jewell
FACTS

A

The defendant drove to his colleagues house and shot him twice. The defendant claimed he had lost control but there was evidence of premeditation as things such as his passport, driving license, cheque and a survival kit where found in his car

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

r v jewell
LEGAL PRINCIPLE

A

evidence of premeditation or planning is not a loss of control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

r v ward
FACTS

A

during a house party the deceased attacked the defendant and gouged his eye. The decesed dint defend himself and the defendants brother stated that the deceased was crazy. They then left and returned armed with various objects a killed him

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

r v ward
LEGAL PRINCIPLE

A

Fear of violence on another person can amount to a qualifying trigger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

r v clinton
FACTS

A

The defendant and his wife were suffering from depression. The defendant wasexpirencing flancial difficulties and stress at work. They separated for a feel weeks in which she had an affair they agreed to meet at their home to tell their children that their marriage was over. Instead he was heavily intoxicated and beaten her repeatedly which hilled her

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

r v clinton
LEGAL PRINCIPAL

A

Sexual infedenty can not be relied upon on its own as a qualifying trigger sexual infedentys existence doesn’t prevent reliance on the defence where there exists other qualifying triggers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

r v zebedee
FACTS

A

the h defendant murdered his 94 year old father after he had soiled himself repearaly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

r v zebedee
LEGAL PRINCIPLE

A

For the things said or done to be a qualifying trigger, they must constitute circumstances of an extremely grave character and the defendant must have a justifiable sense of being seriously wronged

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly