Loss of property rights in the home - Repossession Flashcards
(63 cards)
Four-Maids Ltd v Dudley Marshall
A dispute arose over a lease agreement. Four-Maids Ltd leased a property to Dudley Marshall Properties Ltd, who then defaulted on rent payments.
Four-Maids Ltd v Dudley Marshall Properties Judgement
Held, the mortgagee was entitled to an order for possession; there would be such an order, but its operation would be postponed for two months
Cheltenham & Gloucester Building Society v Norgan
- Mrs Norgan borrowed £90,000 from Cheltenham & Gloucester Building Society secured
against her house. - Under the terms of the agreement, Mrs Norgan was to repay the loan in monthly instalments over a period of 21 years.
It was a standard term of the contract that if any instalment was
not paid, Cheltenham & Gloucester would be entitled to possession of the property.
Mrs Norgan fell into arrears and Cheltenham & Gloucester sought a possession order
Cheltenham & Gloucester Building Society v Norgan judgement
- The first instance judge held that four years was a ‘reasonable period’ within which to repay the arrears. On the basis that there was no evidence that Mrs Norgan could settle the
outstanding arrears within that period, the judge held that the possession order should be executed.
Mrs Norgan appealed. - The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, with Waite LJ giving judgement
Waite LJ in Cheltenham & Gloucester
‘The court should take as its starting point the full term of the mortgage and pose at the outset the question: would it be possible for the mortgagor to maintain payment off of the arrears by instalments over that period?’
Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank
- The freehold owner discovered from a neighbour that his house (in which he was not living at the time) had been sold by the mortgagee.
- The court held that this was a legitimate exercise of the bank’s common law right to take possession by peaceable entry without seeking a possession order.
- BUT see Protection from Eviction Act 1977 s.1 and Criminal Law Act 1977 s.6 – criminal penalties
- If anyone living at the property, mortgagee should seek a court order for possession
Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank judgement
The Court of Appeal refused to grant the Ropaigealachs the declaration sought and, in construing s. 36 in a literal manner, held that the provision only applied where a mortgagee had
brought possession proceedings
Bank of Scotland v Zinda
- The case revolved around Mr. Zinda, who had fallen into mortgage arrears and a possession order was granted, but suspended, allowing him to pay off the arrears.
- Later, the Bank of Scotland consolidated the arrears with the outstanding loan balance, but Mr. Zinda fell into further arrears and applied to suspend enforcement of the original possession order
Bank of Scotland v Zinda judgement
The Court of Appeal ruled that the Bank of Scotland could enforce the original possession order, as the initial arrears-related cause for the order was not extinguished, even though the arrears were later consolidated or cleared, and the arrears were not addressed within a reasonable period
Purpose of Bank of Scotland v Zinda
If borrower breaches the terms of a suspended possession order, the possession order is executable without a further court hearing
Palk v Mortgage Service Fund plc facts
- The mortgagor owed £358,000 and wished to sell the mortgaged property to reduce this
indebtedness. The mortgagor had negotiated a sale of the property at £283,000. The mortgagee
refused to consent to the sale and wished to lease the property and wait for an increase in house
prices - In the circumstances, was the mortgagor entitled to an order for sale under s. 91 of the
LPA 1925 against the express wishes of the mortgagee?
Palk v Mortgage Service Fund plc judgement
- The Court of Appeal held that it had an ‘unfettered discretion’ under s. 91 and an order for sale was made.
- The fact that the mortgagee was not in breach of any of its duties was just one factor to be taken into account.
- To order sale was just and equitable as otherwise unfairness and injustice
would follow in view of the prospect of the mortgagor’s increasing indebtedness.
Relevant considerations in Cheltenham & Gloucester
- How much can borrower reasonably afford to pay, now and in future
- How long are temporary difficulties likely to last?
- What is the reason for the arrears?
- How much remains of original term?
- What re the relevant contractual term and what type of mortgage is it (ie when is the principal debt due to be repaid)?
- Should the court exercise its power to disregard accelerated payment provisions under s.8 of AJA 1973?
- Is it reasonable to expend the lender to recoup the arrears of interest over the whole of the original term/within a shorter period or even a longer period (eg extend the repayment period? Should the interest be capitalised (eg added to the principal debt)?
- Are there any reasons affecting the security which should influence the length of the period for repayment?
S. 36 Administration of Justice Act 1970 (as amended by AJA 1973)
Allows for a reasonable period of time for the mortgagor to gather the funds to pay off the debt to the mortgagee
What is a mortgage?
A secured debt - secured on the borrower’s land. Both a contract between borrower and lender (mortgagor and mortgagee) and a proprietary interest for the lender in the borrower’s land
What happens to the mortgage when the debt is repaid?
When the debt is repaid, usually by instalments over 25 years, title to the land is no longer affected
What happens to the mortgage is the debt is not repaid, or the borrower defaults on some instalments?
The mortgagee may take possession of the property and sell it to recoup the money owning to them
What does the mortgagee have if they take possession of the property?
It has priority over the interest of the borrower and can look to its own interest, but must act fairly towards the borrower
What legislation and section is concerned with the effect of registration of mortgage?
S.29 LRA 2002
What is the importance of this legislation?
S.29 LRA 2002
Has the effect of postponing to the mortgage any interest affecting the estate immediately before the disposition whose priority is not protected at the time of registration
What is protected and by what legislation?
Sch. 3, para. 2, LRA 2002
The overriding interest of a person in actual occupation is protected, but only if that person has a proprietary interest in the land
What else does a mortgagee enter? What legislation supports this?
A restriction, which requires their consent to disposition of the land during lifetime of the mortgage
S.40 LRA 2002
What happens if the mortgage isn’t registered
the mortgage can only take effect in equity, not at law
What legislation requires the mortgage to be registered?
S.27 LRA 2002