Management Styles Flashcards
5 different styles in order of most control to least control
Autocratic Persuasive Consultative Participative Laissez-faire
Autocratic
An autocratic management style is one where the manager tends to make all the decisions, dictating work methods, limiting employee knowledge about what needs to be done in the next step to be performed, and frequently checking on employee performance. The autocratic manager generally provides clear directives by telling employees what to do, without listening to or permitting any employee input.
2 advantages autocratic
- Directions and procedures are clearly defined; there is little uncertainty.
- Employees’ roles and expectations are set out plainly, so management can monitor their performance.
2 disadvantages autocratic
- No employee input is allowed, so ideas are not encouraged or shared. This meansemployees do not get the chance to develop their skills, and they do not feel valued.
- When no responsibility is given to lower level staff, job satisfaction decreases.This impacts on issues such as absenteeism and staff turnover.
When does autocratic work
The autocratic style of management can be effective in a time of crisis, when immediate compliance with rules or procedures is needed, or in meeting an unexpected deadline, when speed is important. This approach is also effective when team members do not know each other well or when individuals lack skills and knowledge. A frontline manager, for example, might adopt this style when supervising new employees. It is generally accepted, however, that this style does not encourage the best performance from employees.
Persuasive
The persuasive management style is one where the manager attempts to convince employees that management’s way is the right way. Authority and control are centralised with senior management, but managers attempt to make employees accept the objectives of the organisation and work to certain plans and procedures. Communication is one-way, and workers are not given the opportunity to share ideas or provide feedback.
2 advantages persuasive
- Managers can gain some trust and support through persuasion.
- Workers believing that their feelings are being considered mayapproach tasks, and the organisation as a whole, more positively.
2 disadvantages persuasive
- Attitudes and trust remain negative. Employees fail to give full support to management.
- Communication is still poor and limited to a top-to-bottom, one-way system.
When does persuasive work
Same as autocratic
Consultative
A consultative management style is one where the manager recognises the importance of good personal relationships among employees and consults with staff on certain issues before making a decision. This implies a two-way communication process, with employees sharing their ideas with a manager who is willing to listen.
2 advantages consultative
- Asking for suggestions from employees allows for a greater variety of ideas, and should improve the quality of management decisions.
- Employees begin to have some ownership in the way in which the organisation is run, so they take more of an interest in it. This is reflected in their levels of motivation and commitment, which increase substantially.
2 disadvantages consultative
- The time taken to consult all the relevant employees can slow the entire process.
- Some issues to be decided are simply not suitable for a widespread consultation process. If the process is not consistent with each decision made, staff can become uncertain and confused about their role.
When does consultative work
This management style is most effective when a new operating procedure is to be introduced or some organisational change implemented. It provides an opportunity for employees to have some input at the time of decision making.
Participative
A participative management style is one where the manager not only consults with employees, but also gives them some responsibility in the management of the process. In this sense, the manager shares the decision-making authority with subordinates.
2 advantages participative
- Communication is a two-way process.
- Employer/employee relations are positive and there is reducedlikelihood of industrial disputes. Employees are more likely to accept management decisions.
2 disadvantages participative
- Reaching decisions and introducing tasks can be time consumingwhen differing views have to be considered. The quality of decisions may also suffer because compromises are made rather than decisive, clear directions given.
- The role of management, and the control of the manager, may be weakened and undermined, with employees given too much power in some cases.
When does participative work
This participative management style is most effective when an organisation is operating in an environment undergoing rapid change. Individual employees accept responsibility for, and can implement changes. This makes the organisation more responsive to change. Activities such as brainstorming generate a range of opinions and ideas, and these may lead to better decisions being made.
Laisezz-faire
A laissez-faire management style is one where employees are responsible for workplace operations. Management has no central role and power.
2 advantages laissez-faire
- Employees feel a sense of ownership, which can promote outstanding results.
- There is continual encouragement for creativity, which is conducive to a dynamic working environment.
2 disadvantages laissez-faire
- There is a complete loss of control by management. No control or direction means there is potential for misuse of the organisation’s resources, including time and money, because these have been placed in the hands of the employees.
- This style can breed personal conflicts, where individuals do not cooperate or wish to implement only their own ideas. In these cases, management is not there to direct or negotiate.
When does laissez-faire work
The laissez-faire management style is most effective for creative work or research, with employees who are highly talented or quali ed in the tasks to be performed and where minimal supervision and direction is required.
Contingency management theory
There is no one best style, except the one chosen appropriately and which contributes to the organisation achieving its objectives.
Management style
A manager’s style is essentially their way of doing things, their behaviour and attitude. Management styles can be placed on a continuum, with the autocratic manager at one end and the laissez-faire manager at the other.
Premium Meals on Demand is a newly established large-scale organisation. The organisation offers healthy prepacked meals delivered to customers’ homes. The organisation has expanded rapidly and has three factories where meals are cooked and packed. Orders must be placed at least 24 hours before delivery. Simon Smithers is the Operations Manager and has found that as demand for meals has increased, a number of issues have arisen. There has been a failure to deliver some orders on time, while a number of employees have complained about the lack of some ingredients and reported difficulties in meeting deadlines. Simon is worried about these emerging issues.
Identify and secure two features of a management style Simon Smithers could use as he investigates the issues that have arisen at premium meals on demand. Justify the chosen styles use.
Simon should use an autocratic style of management. This is where the managers make decisions by themselves and tell employees what the decisions are and what is required from them. One characteristic of this style is that it has one communication as employees don’t get a chance to respond to the orders and try aNd change them. Another characteristic is centralised decision making, all decisions are made by managers with no employee input. This style is recommended for Simon as he is in a time of crisis and needs to do something about the issue quickly. An autocratic style allows for quick implementation of changes as they can be made without employee input, this would allow Simon to make changes which will hopefully fix the problems and communicate these changes to employees and let them know what is required from them.