Managing expectations Flashcards
(22 cards)
What effects can participant expectations cause?
people act the way they think you want them to behave
- Placebo effect
- Nocebo effect
- Demand characteristics
what is the Placebo effect?
Where patient psychological and physiological improvement based off of their expectations of an “inert” substance or treatment in context.
Where patients who were given the placebo and believed they got the treatment etc. preformed as well as people with treatment.
What is the Nocebo effect?
when patients have adverse effects on patient performance (psychological and physiologically). due to warnings or suggestions made in experiment
Demand characteristics
features of your experimental design allow participants to guess what your research question is... 1. Hawthorne Effect; you act differently when you know that your behaviour is being watched 2. The "good participant" effect; desire to want to please the experimenter and do really well; thus they try to find out the technique and master it
solution to effects caused by participants expectations (placebo, nocebo & DC-Hawthorne & DC-good participant).
- Creating a well designed control condition which accounts for theses effects
- Make sure participants are blind to which condition they are in
- Make sure participants are blind to hypothesis
- Obscuring what the purpose of your method, measures and scales are for
- debrief to fin what they THOUGHT the RQ was
Researcher expectation bias in what stages
During…
- data collection
- data coding
- data analysis
Solutions to Researcher bias during data collection
- ensure the researcher is blind to participants condition and what the hypothesis is
- Standardised instructions across conditions
- Automated data collection
Researcher bias during data coding
Use computers to be coded through technology to remove human error, boredom, and decay.
Solutions to Researcher bias during data coding
- Blind coders (to participants condition, so it’s even across conditions)
- Naive coders (Not told hypothesis till after coding- no motivation bias)
- Multiple coders (compare coder biases)
- Use a predetermined coding scheme
Researcher coding during Analysis
- The garden f forking paths, where experimenters decisions determine the results you found.
i. e participant inclusion and exclusions. - Data transformation, making your data conform to a normal distribution.
Solutions to researcher bias during analysis
1. Preregistration of analysis. you decide what is the best way to analysis your data & document it 2. Transparent reporting of results. Put data online for critique on your analysis 3. Good statistical training Understand statistics!
Factorial designs have …
multiple variables and variable levels at the same time
Advantages of factorial designs
\+ life is complicated we want to see how variables interact \+ To refine a theory \+ To isolate a feature of interest \+ To access change over time \+ To increase internal validity
Issues of Factorial designs
-
What are defining features of factorial designs?
Factorial designs are described by the number of variables and the number of levels they each have i.e. 1. 2x2 factorial design (2V & 2L) 2. 2x3 (2V, 1# 2L, 1# 3L) 3. 2X2X4 (3V, 2# 2L, 1# 4L)
on average= main effects
500 700 =600
or
600 700= 650
e.g. overall there are main effects of emotion on response time that is Rt is faster to respond to anger faces than happy faces
differences= main effects
differences conditions
550 700, main effect of anxiety (550) where they respond to faces faster than non anxious .
interactions. between two main effects
focus on differences IN differences
interactions
The less parallel the lines are, the more likely there is to be a significant
interaction.
Main effects
Main effects. For the main effect of expectations, look to see whether the lines
are, in general, higher or lower than the one another
There is a main effect of emotion such that anger faces are identified faster than happy faces.
There is a main effect of anxiety such as that responses are faster in the anxious group compared to the non-anxious group.
There is an interaction between anxiety an emotion such that participants in the anxious condition were faster to respond to angry than happy faces, BUT participants in the non-anxious condition showed no difference in there response time to angry and happy faces.
Ceiling effect
a ceiling effect is the point at which an independent variable (which is the variable being manipulated) is no longer affecting the dependent variable (which is the variable being measured).