market failure Flashcards
(36 cards)
neg pro ext: indirect tax short run
cost of production increase
neg pro ext: indirect tax long run
incentives for producers to use less polluting or non-polluting energy sources
neg pro ext: indirect tax adv [4]
- immediate effect
- tax revenue collected
- reduce monitoring cost (vs gov regulation)
- externality internalised
neg pro ext indirect tax disadv [4]
- not effective to decrease market quantity under price inelastic demand
- increase income disparity
- technical difficulties in calculating tax
- might increase tax evasion
neg pro ext indirect tax diff stakeholders [5]
- from consumer pov
- loss- price paid is higher market quantity
- producer
- short run- price received PP and market quantity decrease- total revenue decrease
- ps decrease area
- long run - incentive to improve: reduce the cost, improve technology or diversify production
- renewable energy
- increase long run competitiveness
- government
- increase tax revenue - workers
- demand decrease → W decrease and decrease employment - society- good
- improve allocative efficiency
neg pro ext tradable permits short run
the higher cost from trade permits will increase the MPC
neg pro ext tradable permits long run
- gives incentives to producers to switch to less polluting resource
- MSC decreases
- lower cost of production
- earning extra by selling the extra permits
neg pro ext tradable permits adv [4]
- immediate effect
- incentive to firms
- no monitoring cost (vs gov regulation)
- externality internalised
neg pro ext tradable permits disadv [3]
- not effective to decrease market quantity under price inelastic
- increase income disparity
- administrative procedure and cost to arrange the system
neg pro ext gov reg adv [4]
- no technical difficulties
- effective to reduce the market quantity even under price inelastic demand
- less cost
- comparatively to subsidy (consumption only)
———
pos con ext - increase income equality
- everyone pay same
- poor and rich face the same price reduction
- it takes higher percentage of the income of the poor than the rich
- poor benefit relatively more than the rich
neg pro ext gov reg disadv [5]
- additional cost to enforce + no tax revenue
- design of legislation is time consuming
- black market and illegal trading
- ## political constraintspos pro ext
- increase income disparity
- face same increase in price
neg pro ext education adv [five]
- long term habit change
- no technical difficulties
- effective to reduce the market when ped inelastic
- increase income equality
- producer revenue based on consumer demand
neg pro ext education disadv [4]
- takes long time to achieve effect
- increase gov expenditure
- ## consumers being ignorantpos con ext
- increase income inequality
- unequal access to education
- reinforcing systematic biases
neg pro ext ad adv [6]
- producer revenue based on consumer demand
- comparatively less cost used
- avoid the technical difficulties in taxations
- effective to reduce the market quantity even under price inelastic demand
- increase income equality
- long term habit change
neg pro ext ad disadv [4]
- consumers being ignorant
- takes time to amend in the long term
- increase government expenditure + no tax revenue
- producers lose: decrease in total revenue + production surplus
pos pro ext subsidy adv [3]
- immediate effect
- increase the income equality
- poor and rich face the same price increase - no monitoring cost
pos pro ext subsidy disadv [three]
- not effective to increase the market quantity under price inelastic demand
- increase government expense
- technical difficulties
pos pro ext direct provision adv [two]
- effective under price inelastic demand
- improve income equality
pos pro ext direct provision disadv [2]
- time consuming
- increase gov expense
neg con ext indirect tax stakeholder perspectives [5]
- consumer
short run: loss
- market price increase quantity decrease
- consumer surplus decrease
long run: gain
- improve health
- improve productivity → high income
- beneficial - producer
short run: loss
- price received PP and market quantity decrease- total revenue and producer surplus decrease
long run: gain - incentive to improve: reduce the cost, improve technology or diversify production
- renewable energy
- increase long run competitiveness
- total revenue and producer surplus decrease
- government- increase tax revenue
- workers
- demand decrease → W decrease and decrease employment - society- good
- improve allocative efficiency
public good- direct provision pros [2]
- government sole decision
- enjoy economies of scale
public good- direct provision cons [three]
- not profit orientated
- increase government budget pressure
- technical difficulties
contracting production to private sector with protection from the government pros [4]
- increase innovation and quality of goods and services under competition
- less cost
- more advanced technology
- flexible
contracting production to private sector with protection from the government cons [3]
- if competition is on cost -> cut cost
- no accountability form government
- government having less control over quantity of goods provided